220 40956 <41c14b27-fa17-4b8c-a565-d2a445657f99@isocpp.org> article Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: yakitori1010@gmail.com Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: Is C++ must need the finalizer? do you think? Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 03:20:44 -0800 (PST) Lines: 151 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: <41c14b27-fa17-4b8c-a565-d2a445657f99@isocpp.org> References: <01da2507-f069-48bb-9980-024ca148e1c3@isocpp.org> <59cd5315-4bc3-4d9f-a317-7fe278468f2d@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_31_1691392694.1541935244736" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1541935120 8945 195.159.176.226 (11 Nov 2018 11:18:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 11:18:40 +0000 (UTC) To: ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBDD7HZ424QGBBDNBUDPQKGQEADEHYQY@isocpp.org Sun Nov 11 12:18:36 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-yw1-f69.google.com ([209.85.161.69]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gLnlE-0002FW-Mh for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 12:18:36 +0100 Original-Received: by mail-yw1-f69.google.com with SMTP id j69-v6sf6045488ywb.19 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 03:20:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isocpp-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=3W8l3Izxa+hq0vQinlLxsklPnubFw9z0Smlgi8GFyPk=; b=LzaL67rVpboH6DQ2Je9kaEQGYL3Ta5UHiiO6qQLGCYKz9uiMocKlBfKRzmFd9K4CC3 jKEz7zYdMWlwBVl8FoCAZqqra7rOGOllcEhzQpblXZb+YdHi1DpmzSEAMJPCOb6b6M20 n8NC6tkakixoc2DodbETq9/HjS9PSNn+12a60hCG2118Q3YUwMYKV8Vvx7u+xyacUd02 H6cixIp1e/kpV/B1kDcdYytRog86AQnzMta95lZSmPEgjTsWvfYxzd9iM5nA48T8NBwt ccXT1eClhVvb4V3dY8Yvj92vf81qHItfNgP2Ai/T5wiiQfoYZ28antfFtt7y9z3uuXIM EouQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=3W8l3Izxa+hq0vQinlLxsklPnubFw9z0Smlgi8GFyPk=; b=KayiqchF22OG+YieM10fYe3KROASOte3JQ4aNiK67Lv/ajLwlziFwlDauByrdx4yOY 3z+pAhGya4HT2pHj7SbHamj0Mplj9sU3uYDS4fP3csNT9lVl0buAD1dSzn92T1kYRQaL 3iOMiFB20gbKJXYM1k66znOndTUaolK77MxOsL5pql4320SFu4XAtbDrSAE3mbS0irjq n0xRLcyXqjUh2+lkGo9ZVEJmJ1uDNOoO1VcZH+Ia55X1lSXA/OFuuCWg80OC+32UODqm MADaTHHMBXyZgO+INDNUUIuxDILosVeweZouU4F90Q5ZLIpeyrRuN3iSXJX547JJNkcn 5iiQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence :mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help :list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=3W8l3Izxa+hq0vQinlLxsklPnubFw9z0Smlgi8GFyPk=; b=bYaTz8USe7BPzOOxOhIaUVkRyGTNhmE4u93S+Z4d4/99KA+3pI4NuThCX8IhS3A8oi wDSQD4r24JwSmsGRAgEovFSpMgL9rHPsIK3s/knM3i+FZ0uxkq5AsOUJba8gm7PAMLTK 1qMbnPqVAjWgZxbTXG5C2F8R0jBY0+F4kylFTUaWcRtgpXrzqHi/6ewI+2Vdgo0cwR3y Yfec3WAUf8sjKQAi1nOW8jK+cEDOORLXZAEOMdK5xbEIRcq7Ymrf8JLypxBTrs6fqicM FW/vvPziRbLBEoN2/uJ9GduutRnbWb8gy8pf0V0SZdEA4qG4yZCRNocAYbBLwT3/dFzM 6D9w== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJVd/A9klakdQtExlN0glA6E3XY2WucKXBdicWRIhbYzYFi6caf yqFmJ0AXfRzL7o3LeRgV9q9xjQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fIlypwXdTCK4504dW3BFTKFi/cm8+uivaou6masCEaUMyYGG8L22TDGD3YmD9GFW6g8kqo6Q== X-Received: by 2002:a25:4157:: with SMTP id o84-v6mr8167599yba.0.1541935246650; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 03:20:46 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 2002:a25:5012:: with SMTP id e18-v6ls2394668ybb.13.gmail; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 03:20:45 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a25:50cd:: with SMTP id e196-v6mr153703ybb.0.1541935245463; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 03:20:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: yakitori1010@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: std-proposals@isocpp.org X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:40956 Archived-At: ------=_Part_31_1691392694.1541935244736 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_32_1313025903.1541935244736" ------=_Part_32_1313025903.1541935244736 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable thank you for your opinion. i study the one thing. so good. and sorry to like parrot to say. is the variable to be?=20 2018=E5=B9=B411=E6=9C=8811=E6=97=A5=E6=97=A5=E6=9B=9C=E6=97=A5 19=E6=99=821= 6=E5=88=8604=E7=A7=92 UTC+9 Domen Vrankar: > > V V ned., 11. nov. 2018 ob 09:54 je oseba > napisala: > >> thank you for your opinion. >> >> i have one more question. >> >> static object is always static and binding in that? >> will that have to free timing? >> where is this? >> >> i think non free static object is out way the lifecycle theory. >> lifecycle is halting promise. >> if you can not break the old garbege.so you hate it. >> halting promise is clear the that problem.yes! >> >> and the finalizer is solve it.so i think.=20 >> > > Static objects are no different from dynamic objects in this regard. If= =20 > you need to call a static method you can create a scoped object and call = it=20 > inside of the destructor like you would do inside a finally segment. > The advantage of not having a finally is that you don't need to indent=20 > with a try block just for the sake of it: > > try > { > // code > } > finally > { > // all the indentations here are useless noise needed because we want = a=20 > finally block > } > > Here's an old thread on this topic:=20 > https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/forum/#!topic/std-discussion/AApn0= B6MsHg > > There is also a proposal to standardize such scope guards:=20 > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p0052r9.pdf > > Regards, > Domen > > > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp= ..org/d/msgid/std-proposals/41c14b27-fa17-4b8c-a565-d2a445657f99%40isocpp.or= g. ------=_Part_32_1313025903.1541935244736 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
thank you for your opinion.
i study the one= thing. so good.
and sorry to like parrot to say.
is th= e variable to be?=C2=A0

2018=E5=B9=B411=E6=9C=8811=E6=97=A5=E6=97= =A5=E6=9B=9C=E6=97=A5 19=E6=99=8216=E5=88=8604=E7=A7=92 UTC+9 Domen Vrankar= :
V V ned., 11. nov. 2018 ob 09:54 je oseba <yakito...@gm= ail.com> napisala:
thank you for your o= pinion.

i have one more question.

static object is always static and binding in that?
will= that have to free timing?
where is this?

i think non free static object is out way the lifecycle theory.
lifecycle is halting promise.
if you can not break the old garbe= ge.so you hate it.
halting=C2=A0 promise is clear the that proble= m.yes!

and the finalizer is solve it.so i think. <= br>

Static objects are no diffe= rent from dynamic objects in this regard. If you need to call a static meth= od you can create a scoped object and call it inside of the destructor like= you would do inside a finally segment.
The advantage of not havi= ng a finally is that you don't need to indent with a try block just for= the sake of it:

try
{
=C2=A0= =C2=A0 // code
}
finally
{
=C2= =A0=C2=A0 // all the indentations here are useless noise needed because we = want a finally block
}


<= /div>
There is also a proposal to standardize such scope guards: http://www.open-s= td.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p0052r9.pdf
=
Regards,
Domen


<= /div>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposa= ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.= com/a/isocpp.org/d/msgid/std-proposals/41c14b27-fa17-4b8c-a565-d2a445657f99= %40isocpp.org.
------=_Part_32_1313025903.1541935244736-- ------=_Part_31_1691392694.1541935244736-- .