220 40942 article Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: yakitori1010@gmail.com Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Is C++ must need the finalizer? do you think? Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:27:26 -0800 (PST) Lines: 87 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_1444_1770990502.1541899646435" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1541899523 12464 195.159.176.226 (11 Nov 2018 01:25:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 01:25:23 +0000 (UTC) To: ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBDD7HZ424QGBB74KT3PQKGQESPVDPDQ@isocpp.org Sun Nov 11 02:25:18 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-yb1-f199.google.com ([209.85.219.199]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gLeV4-00038O-Ig for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 02:25:18 +0100 Original-Received: by mail-yb1-f199.google.com with SMTP id i13-v6sf5714347ybg.2 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:27:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isocpp-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=SoyhEpKqC6UtD0Lcqsqc5qqcJatJ7HSU/XzQtPxps+M=; b=2AdgRxZOhmSRLMj6zfBsHS3Mb6s+AF04UUi5u4+QkcEAG7cTO8QgbXqNwI2puDQjHy U+2nAkoie5vNJbd6qmdZaQUxZ+CAr+tIHfE4z3R9OC6PH2Uzdpru0MINiNOzKCaUoRl7 djWYMnSejYE8bzHbyKYHmGbxWSm/BgOzn9Y4pAda+Y/8yVFY74TrCVnagu7O1gVT5Rp4 bqMPSnMoldxo1qJfdtfeffNrQvIhhsZNLiTuYkmhvWz/prm1f10hg9Sck3VJ+bnsbU7q nm/hNxVbn5Au8fl6///dqWFGtmC9ghUd1jmPDjpv+oYji8TwhRxZDnetU7P81tdYBc3F AAPA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=SoyhEpKqC6UtD0Lcqsqc5qqcJatJ7HSU/XzQtPxps+M=; b=bb76L0HYAZViVDlXMWXEggczDNWBGjhxS/Kqee7CG9IBEQ9XMD0ractpksRJG8/VF5 sI0CnO6NuuQy/RQPg9+4RvszOF5KU06wqEOvCTbL4t2PLhrGKM1zKgKyIMex0OzWW60S fWd0QCUdw35kuaZk/oPnunN7bQy2349sf8IlOpGNiZX/BXa4UyTXQR+wyq/j4gsIwrJN iKhnf3WCuIlgHR4W8tOPy5isGtoQpO48jJbh++CjdCEcVuzhSz0hdwQgVlPH59lg6fuS xySPQontdPoB7cmpBTZVSmy7UJTBB472TlSBcGpuLygivsGhRQkBrjRZD4iCagVy+6tF O3pA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=SoyhEpKqC6UtD0Lcqsqc5qqcJatJ7HSU/XzQtPxps+M=; b=UIg7B2WqJPU8kI+iwXFOnppybXLnKj44X/NH9AjhIC/wDA6QeKQMfb+M5FS5IIb+75 K5fKSptZqJvHJUa+SsYBnZf1EIcR9BIj06PwCVLt4i1uhsQ7UssW5tUZuxo+DdI11lrC iwDFeAtcR4tVqeLjFM9TMQSClfsuOx1qpR3gZ371Mzr+P5LyVaQtW/sETJDeIZ0+LdFb eRyRKvoW50T+6sWiJUR6kMTyI4yHtWwy41vzKHVAQax8Oxc4ypu6evvW6F7o4gKlZb5V 4vfFKar93PU5p57vb41bk8XEl2hUq/OMXfkIRUBVGRgwwfGwFV3VxQ0DkF9GIUrUQ+/4 maKw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gKCNav60IakLK3F9Om9VbaA4QVpBsccKzgB6BiUhJOLD+2ZisjP qJO41TvwjiqapLOZRQ9WPoPCPw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5eggkD5EgkJR45wbyaqBdTGm4gIsapWvGnBTcVC1NviYGrlK69HAW5HYs9e+YuQISuDXV/R5Q== X-Received: by 2002:a25:e78c:: with SMTP id e134-v6mr7197958ybh.90.1541899648534; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:27:28 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 2002:a25:74c6:: with SMTP id p189-v6ls2028409ybc.12.gmail; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:27:27 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a25:afcd:: with SMTP id d13-v6mr154260ybj.2.1541899647232; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:27:27 -0800 (PST) X-Original-Sender: yakitori1010@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: std-proposals@isocpp.org X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:40942 Archived-At: ------=_Part_1444_1770990502.1541899646435 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1445_1300475193.1541899646436" ------=_Part_1445_1300475193.1541899646436 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" hello. thank you for prev posts opinion. it is good study for me. now i have some leisure. if i have time to thinking for something. and spown to a thing. is C++ need the finalizer? C++ object model have [constructer] & [destructer]. it is normaly ok.but... to i say parable for campany work flow.this is one of a case. day start to [constructer] moving.it is construct to "flow of a day". live with some method in the day. day end to [destructer] moving to end of "flow of a day". i have question. where is the static object's free timing? it on c++. at company to where is free timing of "stacked something". so i think all resuroce is need to free for last time. to my thinking arrive to "is C++ need the finalizer?". do you think? thank you. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/d/msgid/std-proposals/b4adbcd6-b84f-498b-87b4-305543009d82%40isocpp.org. ------=_Part_1445_1300475193.1541899646436 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
hello.

thank you for prev po= sts opinion.
it is good study for me.

no= w i have some leisure.
if i have time to thinking for something.<= /div>

and spown to a thing.

is = C++ need the finalizer?

C++ object model have [con= structer] & [destructer].
it is normaly ok.but...
<= br>
to i say parable for campany work flow.this is one of a case.=
day start to [constructer] moving.it is construct=C2=A0 to "= ;flow of a day".
live with some method in the day.
day end to [destructer] moving to end of "flow of a day".
<= div>
i have question.

where is the s= tatic object's free timing? it on c++.
at company to where is= free timing of=C2=A0 "stacked something".=C2=A0

so i think all resuroce is need to free for last time.
t= o my thinking arrive to "is C++ need the finalizer?".
<= br>
do you=C2=A0 think?

thank you.
=

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposa= ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.= com/a/isocpp.org/d/msgid/std-proposals/b4adbcd6-b84f-498b-87b4-305543009d82= %40isocpp.org.
------=_Part_1445_1300475193.1541899646436-- ------=_Part_1444_1770990502.1541899646435-- .