220 36435 <5cf989da-fb68-4c93-8a72-7542f9e437ee@isocpp.org> article Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: bastienpenava@gmail.com Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: The current attribute/keyword dividing line is unsustainable. Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2017 16:05:05 -0800 (PST) Lines: 59 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: <5cf989da-fb68-4c93-8a72-7542f9e437ee@isocpp.org> References: <86919454-9af9-4b08-b7b3-fd262b46cdd5@isocpp.org> <40edf1b5-5c72-4682-902e-1c0cea581e37@isocpp.org> <3c34aa3e-bf47-4d4f-be71-522c7cc0a9bf@isocpp.org> <99dbedb0-ba68-4245-a809-a7e8d9f0c501@isocpp.org> <1e0e91af-0794-4e8c-b18a-d8a895d3787f@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_26627_457122334.1514678705983" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1514678593 21608 195.159.176.226 (31 Dec 2017 00:03:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2017 00:03:13 +0000 (UTC) To: ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCG3XHNI6IDRBM6TUDJAKGQE7OBJPMY@isocpp.org Sun Dec 31 01:03:09 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-ua0-f199.google.com ([209.85.217.199]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eVR5l-00056h-Is for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2017 01:03:05 +0100 Original-Received: by mail-ua0-f199.google.com with SMTP id b42sf18402249uah.20 for ; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 16:05:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isocpp-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=oKP2j0ReSUUB7wQ2CGWJ96vQXJdSHrf8GQpnZ15jQC8=; b=Vob/5UoTz3TvTFHOIfSe6O97WHUwh9Cb/XGE7jsegpC2eHrMx4fMu75Up6KCPPv6Xg tJHX0ueo0XhrlvqrQIMoPYNA9jtMgTGfGTnTr1JG3brUxTurdhiB671YV4KKcaN8/bb4 AQPtBTjYz4drzQfRBCI1UFHpgGXFz0mLnDJi7D4t9cDtq9IZHQGAY9WiYmYbtBTZsSbh QghuvvdtBwaRl76VfBsBUDl6ikKBoSIJhJwLDoP/yKkKRGU0uVy2MrZ1sJ8baYoQIFB7 mcEssjDO1yq6Zx1JhWfg75uFwOKOaUVkXbwwTdo6Eg4XrITea0pQJh3yLs/OlrnBDV8g uTCg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=oKP2j0ReSUUB7wQ2CGWJ96vQXJdSHrf8GQpnZ15jQC8=; b=M8HZwEvOfxB1uAHAca2jFC1HxbwhXFSaBXCm+c9UYmTtEi9lsAMTBXzJI/BpUnIzuM h+UnmL9ywQdJth4FarFilBBN+J8k7wfb0CRpejxky4YPLE+/H1YRSB1z7JA1ROO9l9Uj 3sKd8y+5ug1kE89l7oC3LY3mefmrMnsfoak4FzB2OyLXEGy/1EBp8CIWObnSM+2hYUag smLkzXzrGBFEwGz3hiD/uDDWPq6LF/A1pTfAFIjLcCCTDr1vEfvOf83MP7MsDsIKRjx1 2vE8gLcXvbEDeoE7ssoI6WX/1RPuicQn5zqB/xMcY/+1J1xIuYDkc6vM0kS28aubVmAD 7DMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence :mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help :list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=oKP2j0ReSUUB7wQ2CGWJ96vQXJdSHrf8GQpnZ15jQC8=; b=U7IWp0IabRKwUWeGB3/V1tv1sj2CpsUemdVKhWJfs2pIRoTrlJ6ms16dOhw+3HgGT6 uOFhEq0Sna/QCc+XSVuKAVQtIF6qzxtUuTMTw2Vt8xHxhqrE5n4v3JuJFk6tKkLY9k7R sAIGkSdLJrLtoOZs1A+TNTa76gU6TdiN1YJUSz5TgbjDBG2/R2GeoFl2GDcoFq7bibFg ykPwM3521i9MFfnhCcQgP64UmsG32FSpp3zAwHhNWsIQwbXYzElRQtMAeUVW+TzAlI6h cJ0BGwgKoTvD8iL6CA6bVLxl62cB/PCAXWGu7fry07TI+Ue7glBIEaKtpelbfN0pd/SA CiqA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJNPkXiHB4uEdXm9xlYj4MlXLtsnmFHB6D/mESHSA3bqRcWpTaj v+WnJGrwqzLwOv1fE0KeHvurWQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovVQKpPvo8p2sR712//E0lzJQVJCDsbUZEfx4fZAdc3kkEYLCeFH/R1AuLFO+ETZ2RzHLkNLw== X-Received: by 10.176.76.110 with SMTP id d46mr14577882uag.72.1514678708202; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 16:05:08 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.176.96.26 with SMTP id j26ls6766269ual.1.gmail; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 16:05:06 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.31.2.144 with SMTP id 138mr3606876vkc.5.1514678706588; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 16:05:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1e0e91af-0794-4e8c-b18a-d8a895d3787f@isocpp.org> X-Original-Sender: BastienPenava@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: std-proposals@isocpp.org X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:36435 Archived-At: ------=_Part_26627_457122334.1514678705983 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_26628_1303219395.1514678705983" ------=_Part_26628_1303219395.1514678705983 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Saturday, December 30, 2017 at 7:06:19 PM UTC+1, Marcin Jaczewski wrote: > > > IMHO "ignored" in sens that they have no meaning for compiler not that > they do not exists. Gathering attributes and write them to some meta struct > is not something that is hard to do and work with any attribute even if > compiler have no clue what it mean. I think this fit attributes nicely. > No actually, a compiler that would parse-skip c++ attributes would be legal. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/d/msgid/std-proposals/5cf989da-fb68-4c93-8a72-7542f9e437ee%40isocpp.org. ------=_Part_26628_1303219395.1514678705983 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Saturday, December 30, 2017 at 7:06:19 PM UTC+1, Marcin= Jaczewski wrote:

IMHO "ignored" in sens that they have no = meaning for compiler not that they do not exists. Gathering attributes and = write them to some meta struct is not something that is hard to do and work= with any attribute even if compiler have no clue what it mean. I think thi= s fit attributes nicely.

No act= ually, a compiler that would parse-skip c++ attributes would be legal.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposa= ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.= com/a/isocpp.org/d/msgid/std-proposals/5cf989da-fb68-4c93-8a72-7542f9e437ee= %40isocpp.org.
------=_Part_26628_1303219395.1514678705983-- ------=_Part_26627_457122334.1514678705983-- .