220 36335 <85442151-e543-416c-8d91-0aed4c395c6f@isocpp.org> article Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Nicol Bolas Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: Now that the std::forward alternative has been rejected Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 22:46:11 -0800 (PST) Lines: 112 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: <85442151-e543-416c-8d91-0aed4c395c6f@isocpp.org> References: <1a84e87b-c045-408c-9828-b1aba2185a0a@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_14743_1241115424.1514184372003" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1514184259 15972 195.159.176.226 (25 Dec 2017 06:44:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 06:44:19 +0000 (UTC) To: ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCEKFTV6ZUMBBNN5QLJAKGQEPKAUKTI@isocpp.org Mon Dec 25 07:44:15 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-ua0-f200.google.com ([209.85.217.200]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eTMUe-0003cY-3G for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Dec 2017 07:44:12 +0100 Original-Received: by mail-ua0-f200.google.com with SMTP id 7sf21178994uap.5 for ; Sun, 24 Dec 2017 22:46:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isocpp-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=/whEdFVZXD5+hn+KXpS4nzJ8KmLAn+T4mOjhsZZyZxw=; b=mjoLXGKDHMRdo09RXgaJbBweHHxBEMAAkv+FNHTzpIJHhEBcMJCumHmJIjMDTYuIiq 0UXVRu+Q+dwQG2OowtnL+pqz50e/W+ZuBnKpBEwVZl02EGvhdy/Ck2moBxlZxdXZ4rJA 2hcY3BMAaLoCGcC2YW7JjZX/iO1xZBGlklIjGtFAdRhA8i2X2KQwkb6SpYHfk8V77fnF EXbQSwaylfkjQn0j/zaGDmutpTM/Z0BzMd1XvtH+2GTkOFtNGOynNFCcMgftps+p8bC+ oxTLr5djE4ICZ12M86PsULffJgv5LLnMX6UR4xbiWACL0sv0qy5nh9pzQZVVCzAhAoOO pBFA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=/whEdFVZXD5+hn+KXpS4nzJ8KmLAn+T4mOjhsZZyZxw=; b=STTsHsiO8VGnD4gblUJSjFGZuUWvtoaJlvw2RB8tAbxBAf4TgR5XUvPtA6SHyQeK1v g1t3LAW9r8PyjJ0hNoo4w2aznnAwY8RFcsFvH8gv97fuFXrf+HxcL7LYvhPd5vrjUd5/ D23yQ+24Ayw/jBpx1SEQwIaH0+N0z2+rEwt9MBiL/xHOy9H2rWsR7dUtSlEF5N0gtP8E G89ooOBO11sL8rMdRVB8ZV/NyOOtmwE0uCbubrlPL4A/hcbFQrLJohURR2VBIfAs8Mbk FWfsnKd7lrYENsRbZC4F0FqwQQ4+LetLlMdgw1GezQy6p2L71DK8vRKFx6TL7tiNyUVQ GzAQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence :mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help :list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=/whEdFVZXD5+hn+KXpS4nzJ8KmLAn+T4mOjhsZZyZxw=; b=cAYh98p186XwQnpV1JFw535DqQ97Yk06Jw26sC8UuAWuSeJ6sW0xZ/Uu4UGoIQuelb cpGhDGmlq54QyT3tNDwizAjwdZG6T11AAbjXKMeePEThYnK3ebDCfqcMcdNWB1KgFENh K6wxvk1qf5+bN0DS4d0C5D7vmLgqUXasrVnvCLu5FJh/dQC/WN7rrfSDX9mBv4YnIoj/ FQ4MWQ2/NQKv2SC1CYjbO2A9L3WKKr9uTrrVrgJf9HEGVnzc7K9JeiGJ7/sX3eTs6rFV tSgvmx3dxzntr1sETQo32WvOsmO6ABL/RD6RNgFnY222Wa3oJCXBZBZ7QZj/zCtvp+GL ftIw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJ05INKgvhhJqJhQz9tBLRZf4oO62cn/pk5A697/egmvILeKe92 3Yf0XHlG+emkVY1W3rBdwE2COg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBouKcq/IjnMgwnfDPQN5rjraC7If87LCB8rgI3j12NQTCJKjP2enGep4a7CzPVZnYstVuLlLcQ== X-Received: by 10.31.128.8 with SMTP id b8mr9157059vkd.50.1514184374529; Sun, 24 Dec 2017 22:46:14 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.176.89.194 with SMTP id k2ls89800uad.10.gmail; Sun, 24 Dec 2017 22:46:13 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.31.162.68 with SMTP id l65mr550420vke.12.1514184372564; Sun, 24 Dec 2017 22:46:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: jmckesson@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: std-proposals@isocpp.org X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:36335 Archived-At: ------=_Part_14743_1241115424.1514184372003 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_14744_1404046191.1514184372004" ------=_Part_14744_1404046191.1514184372004 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday, December 25, 2017 at 1:24:17 AM UTC-5, Bastien penavayre wrote: > > > Le lun. 25 d=C3=A9c. 2017 =C3=A0 07:21, Jim Porter >=20 > a =C3=A9crit : > >> On 12/24/2017 10:28 PM, Nicol Bolas wrote: >> > And code like this is certainly not limited to "library writers". Not >> > unless C++ gets lifting lambdas/overload set lambdas (and that's sadly >> > unlikely at this point). >> >> Does that mean "not likely to get *ever*" or "not likely to get in the >> immediate future"? I haven't followed the overload set stuff very >> closely (too busy with other things, unfortunately), but I was >> cautiously excited for it when the papers for it first showed up. >> >> - Jim >> > if you are talking about overload sets as values it will be availble=20 > through reflexpr. > In what respect? That you can reflect over all of the functions that would= =20 be called from a particular name? Sure. Will extracting that into an object be a one-liner? Highly unlikely. > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp= ..org/d/msgid/std-proposals/85442151-e543-416c-8d91-0aed4c395c6f%40isocpp.or= g. ------=_Part_14744_1404046191.1514184372004 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Monday, December 25, 2017 at 1:24:17 AM UTC-5, = Bastien penavayre wrote:
<= br>
Le=C2=A0lun. 25 d=C3=A9c. 2= 017 =C3=A0 07:21, Jim Porter <jvp...@g.rit.edu> a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:
On 12/24/2017 10:28 PM, Nicol Bolas w= rote:
> And code like this is certainly not limited to "library writers&q= uot;. Not
> unless C++ gets lifting lambdas/overload set lambdas (and that's s= adly
> unlikely at this point).

Does that mean "not likely to get *ever*" or "not likely to = get in the
immediate future"? I haven't followed the overload set stuff very<= br> closely (too busy with other things, unfortunately), but I was
cautiously excited for it when the papers for it first showed up.

- Jim
if you are talking about overload sets as va= lues it will be availble through reflexpr.

In what respect? That you can reflect over all of the fun= ctions that would be called from a particular name? Sure.

Will extracting that into an object be a one-liner? Highly unlikely= ..

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposa= ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.= com/a/isocpp.org/d/msgid/std-proposals/85442151-e543-416c-8d91-0aed4c395c6f= %40isocpp.org.
------=_Part_14744_1404046191.1514184372004-- ------=_Part_14743_1241115424.1514184372003-- .