220 35110 <2bbfe507-8c8c-42e1-ab7a-647b0e636e0c@isocpp.org> article Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Corentin Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: unevaluated this Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 01:54:10 -0700 (PDT) Lines: 189 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: <2bbfe507-8c8c-42e1-ab7a-647b0e636e0c@isocpp.org> References: <009e6218-1e2b-402d-ab1a-e8ebf29f8f77@isocpp.org> <1585029.X3zftQQog7@tjmaciei-mobl4> <9086df18-7f96-4376-b7ea-8c9e9f9e31a3@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_148_1552926257.1509008050570" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1509008065 9102 195.159.176.226 (26 Oct 2017 08:54:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 08:54:25 +0000 (UTC) To: ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBC72FQ6X7MLRBM6FY3HQKGQECCMRMAQ@isocpp.org Thu Oct 26 10:54:19 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-vk0-f69.google.com ([209.85.213.69]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e7dvR-0000LL-60 for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 10:54:05 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-vk0-f69.google.com with SMTP id t203sf1404406vke.5 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 01:54:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isocpp-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=ejHGsYFcCVaZBeSir8A7K0PZY5tR74YBlQPyFvSjV+4=; b=pm2vUyM5V5E4ISF1rtTYJTFHoSPG+kOu/OJpZkPYoAqLTeXbDCqTWvMduj90bUTWqP RfITyukcYAup+g5AlRUuurtkjkEa+StWbIst4kex5SRxElxRVJD0unIl/pxcFnP9NoEN F7NvWpQOp3nNFMywohPG/RhNyHBW49P9Uk68xaep3vugxfcX5oJVS3UnV3jyrCOoVA+O bcUNmyMJQeSHLz3O7JDaiwoPXbo/XeR7KdaxgyyKVcGPxzzYXFtJ0pyQCtcS08MHqR2n sV0RBGJoD96D+BGzXKw5Xj8Rvf0Y8CJRucc5JcmJ31J4JhdfqG/eHfCCWrwGGEF9tXvq chGg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=ejHGsYFcCVaZBeSir8A7K0PZY5tR74YBlQPyFvSjV+4=; b=bx+Kcxy3pldp/t5sZJHDP8kib44kAev87ITAZFI0VuGfwf/dZkrd8ARNvq8JXtYbAL AGJjy92G3D6d9GhYgCsXvuU671BnhKBoXAhk119K7sC1uLVkxpTOyuVLJzsTGhM+Xpdb bNIX6E72Md3eevw1iICr8S9pHpyt7jckQ77r87Ye+Rw0IGaepE+JIeaE5rRi836DSq/7 btaUtwzATcqo6qXqchF8KLHMHb+scb5LjtzMj5xXjI7KL0HT7pn/3qe+A385Qjy6elnd BANb7yj6cMSa4B6qQrW7StS6ocAtuAPZHwirmPcfGlThqbfTEEOKk8/pbsmpDsWvjc8z lCew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence :mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help :list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=ejHGsYFcCVaZBeSir8A7K0PZY5tR74YBlQPyFvSjV+4=; b=cpr9IP3Qcvn2CNU9+t5ETPVJk0cXTOTQ7wYT5ZC/AWI6CxPlisL94lCsMlldH8BvxE w/kdPwjoXFevGuZ44dTWIHJW3UkdgGy/Rx9SIwHjMtY3oaE+p7n1rHJx1WpSgqnPEdny g+7MplOAxMD4+sQzeXN7v0A7m8Fa87REAw3ncUHyTiLkys1K2EErzBG1+xSON6IN6QG3 SRQ9Mr0h1f5C2qxxcSESqcmP8gEkhWynE9dZU9RHpJkJduOYsWrjS4Pvta1VwjSKcCEB 5fZIWy9EdxYN6I7o4fylAEf7FZDCdIch4vW6xpUqJubfo+FUP5ENfrnX62Cs3EAfxjOE UwSw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVJ4AEEtDqYIC6eK7JVNIt7+E36eebEN1suxJK8ibtl+IaHXwnV qlvuhDtRAJMvOJbz56ZGrr9Nzg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+RG1Yz9lqpFzWGmWdan/TfQgvZXp3rZVb6sbeQGfdTqonr3C0rsvOB1WY51d+g0HLcnxCY0aQ== X-Received: by 10.176.3.231 with SMTP id 94mr2465399uau.88.1509008052521; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 01:54:12 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.31.141.197 with SMTP id p188ls1381755vkd.9.gmail; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 01:54:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.31.168.133 with SMTP id r127mr415151vke.8.1509008051140; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 01:54:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: corentin.jabot@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:35110 Archived-At: ------=_Part_148_1552926257.1509008050570 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_149_1038126268.1509008050571" ------=_Part_149_1038126268.1509008050571 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm interested in this feature, what's the current status ? Le mardi 16 septembre 2014 18:26:16 UTC+2, Sean Middleditch a =C3=A9crit : > > I would offer some alternative spellings in a paper. I'd leave off the=20 > ability to name the constructor/destructor for now, though I would=20 > leave a note in the paper that it's a possible extension point and let=20 > the committee decide if they want a new paper or a second version of=20 > this paper that adds that feature. I'd prefer to keep things tightly=20 > specified but easily extended. But that's me.=20 > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Matheus Izvekov > wrote:=20 > > On Tuesday, September 16, 2014 12:51:41 AM UTC-3, Sean Middleditch=20 > wrote:=20 > >>=20 > >> So the consensus I'm getting out of this is that I should abandon=20 > >> unevaluated this and return to the decltype(class) idea and write an= =20 > >> actual paper about that instead. Anyone think that's a bad idea and I= =20 > >> should stay the current course?=20 > >>=20 > >=20 > > Would it be too hard for this to get accepted if it introduced another= =20 > > keyword?=20 > > If it wouldn't, how about a new keyword that acts like an alias for the= =20 > name=20 > > of the current class?=20 > > It could be used both for specifying a type, and naming constructors /= =20 > > destructors. :)=20 > >=20 > > --=20 > >=20 > > ---=20 > > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the= =20 > > Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.=20 > > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit=20 > >=20 > https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/d/topic/std-proposals/pienLjyOVJk/= unsubscribe.=20 > > > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to=20 > > std-proposal...@isocpp.org .=20 > > To post to this group, send email to std-pr...@isocpp.org = ..=20 > > > Visit this group at=20 > > http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/.=20 > > > > --=20 > Sean Middleditch=20 > http://seanmiddleditch.com=20 > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp= ..org/d/msgid/std-proposals/2bbfe507-8c8c-42e1-ab7a-647b0e636e0c%40isocpp.or= g. ------=_Part_149_1038126268.1509008050571 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm interested in this feature, what's the current= status ?

Le mardi 16 septembre 2014 18:26:16 UTC+2, Sean Middleditc= h a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:
I would o= ffer some alternative spellings in a paper. I'd leave off the
ability to name the constructor/destructor for now, though I would
leave a note in the paper that it's a possible extension point and = let
the committee decide if they want a new paper or a second version of
this paper that adds that feature. I'd prefer to keep things tightl= y
specified but easily extended. But that's me.

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Matheus Izvekov <mizv...@gmail.com&g= t; wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 16, 2014 12:51:41 AM UTC-3, Sean Middleditch= wrote:
>>
>> So the consensus I'm getting out of this is that I should = abandon
>> unevaluated this and return to the decltype(class) idea and wr= ite an
>> actual paper about that instead. Anyone think that's a bad= idea and I
>> should stay the current course?
>>
>
> Would it be too hard for this to get accepted if it introduced ano= ther
> keyword?
> If it wouldn't, how about a new keyword that acts like an alia= s for the name
> of the current class?
> It could be used both for specifying a type, and naming constructo= rs /
> destructors. :)
>
> --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in= the
> Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" grou= p.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.o= rg/d/topic/std-proposals/pienLjyOVJk/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email t= o
> std-proposal...@isocpp.org.
> To post to this group, send email to std-pr...@isocpp.org.
> Visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/g= roup/std-proposals/.



--=20
Sean Middleditch
http://s= eanmiddleditch.com

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposa= ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.= com/a/isocpp.org/d/msgid/std-proposals/2bbfe507-8c8c-42e1-ab7a-647b0e636e0c= %40isocpp.org.
------=_Part_149_1038126268.1509008050571-- ------=_Part_148_1552926257.1509008050570-- .