220 33227 article Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John McFarlane Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: safe integrals comparison Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 19:38:39 -0700 (PDT) Lines: 96 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <66f9bab2-7220-4bf1-afb7-77c5efa1bac3@isocpp.org> <4a572c09-5142-4834-a907-93c3cc87e79c@isocpp.org> <0537f2f2-645d-4a75-826b-c7f8fba9291e@isocpp.org> <091ab70e-2f91-419d-9a60-345813d59aee@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_1065_1223749780.1500259119290" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1500259127 13416 195.159.176.226 (17 Jul 2017 02:38:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 02:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: federico.kircheis@gmail.com To: ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBDS7B7WQUYOBBL6GWDFQKGQE6P5LECI@isocpp.org Mon Jul 17 04:38:38 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-pg0-f69.google.com ([74.125.83.69]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dWvvf-0002so-V5 for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 04:38:36 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-pg0-f69.google.com with SMTP id t8sf161021838pgs.5 for ; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 19:38:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isocpp-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=AGovfmkLGUHnmqhLrroSzqUpte/fJdC1Dd3W7YWzxz8=; b=rqQsKC/z5CpM63v+cKtk80nCgiz/0/bl2iaWv0DiWM7KUNHBntdubYcWGE8pYUnzMf EZr5vlGYF2MpRYKk6O/TzDcEl0PQaNQprTyp/4d2ZHiLqTg4vYsiNXB0OqVACBcas3IV fVs6eWgVKPjwyJtLOAobXQ8vx8q/wbnQkeKyrQI9yIzxgl/QHzmgwH6oPHwRtSqPaSP8 KQkcF+X0wfYjEcvmJyjV5xNW/3JCwtqlR0nrlHxdq4KoEQRkl5KNo9QSKBOrgNOwAS1o kBNYlO/5vLzNnOSduUlBWYuMYWcfXN2ReL4U6sDxg/1GihrzymIxlcKcYk5803lL6Wyd MusQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=AGovfmkLGUHnmqhLrroSzqUpte/fJdC1Dd3W7YWzxz8=; b=iZdLDSiRghnu8Dgi3Dl1SzEY1r1pn98CUOTHihhY4ZrWIo2EWyLXQLnirGcxTjwfpY DRm7HlZ1shNfpHgMGeV053PCRvEi7ZBi+ODTgMB2tDJZ5nvScxjEL7ak5cYyVod8V+YS SUEFqJhzu013wWaGN7jnjjAHPksC+aubdUPqSl1TlbGb0S0yhFkkhGVTUgmWisZQn6uL bul/Mni84NErOIu28dUnRAtx3rUR8yKVH0I5wUjG4OqhCN6cl5NDu8kbSQ8TgMl2RJTX U6TmLOrWmoPm+ZxIyaGCxYoq6NhoNrTpYU7DuiuVXDvPxh1uj+EB9vR7TjWraZPZoRoL c6gg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=AGovfmkLGUHnmqhLrroSzqUpte/fJdC1Dd3W7YWzxz8=; b=Io59Ql9HenmxktNNNGUAIzXu5OD4PdL7KzADzv+7IG/Ci4ujOpSnhxuLF72XdFI+T3 lUEqzchvLDbZ4vs/Q2CDw6u08p0XoidI7B1Y4g5DgVwMrQGpu2isbD9Ok8c7QPhZF2dz EolBzs5U4+TUvw+S5lG02cvKYbhcS7cTDkQR2Bp9d40ppPB3A4yEW9GNecYJi9J5+i8a 564WRY8tsuuGH4yTkcPBGSuygUkjCQPAExTlCw+EVMlmXHBIfjLis+TEHbnVEvKzz49o 9D0BeiX9kvIyzfAOGINMToG/SHcRRHH9nEtJbmE77NCHRYxMA2/iC2+KH3QfakV8bzyI UOxQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110XsetQJs1Tlv+6x7+MU6U5AC+tznUQVqS4ZWSWPHVZVOGi9Leb gRnY6dORjbu/y0Qw X-Received: by 10.99.103.131 with SMTP id b125mr4768475pgc.137.1500259121105; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 19:38:41 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.36.26.68 with SMTP id 65ls4218137iti.14.canary-gmail; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 19:38:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.31.178.139 with SMTP id b133mr74327vkf.18.1500259119737; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 19:38:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <091ab70e-2f91-419d-9a60-345813d59aee@isocpp.org> X-Original-Sender: mcfarlane.john@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:33227 Archived-At: ------=_Part_1065_1223749780.1500259119290 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1066_51934554.1500259119290" ------=_Part_1066_51934554.1500259119290 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" OK. I assumed P0586R0 was a published paper. It sounds like it should be D0586R0 for the time being then. On Sunday, July 16, 2017 at 2:47:42 PM UTC-7, Nicol Bolas wrote: > > > > On Sunday, July 16, 2017 at 2:56:43 PM UTC-4, John McFarlane wrote: >> >> On Sunday, July 16, 2017 at 1:00:18 AM UTC-7, federico...@gmail.com >> wrote: >>> >>> Another update to the proposal, >>> >>> I've added the references to Robert Ramey's proposal (and a link to an >>> alternative implementation of the comparison functions in his github >>> repository) and Herb Sutter's proposal for operator<=>. >>> >> >> Hi Federico, >> >> I took a quick look at this revision and had a few comments. >> >> If this document has changed by more than a few minor fix-ups, you should >> probably give it a different paper number to avoid confusion. It is no >> longer revision #0. I /think/ the correct approach is to call it D0586R1 >> until you've finished revising it and then submit it as P0586R1. (But I'm >> usually wrong!) >> > > I think the R numbers are for published papers. I've yet to see an R1 > without a published R0, even though sometimes they're published in the same > mailing. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/d/msgid/std-proposals/c126f65a-e607-4fc8-bc4e-f95d541140ca%40isocpp.org. ------=_Part_1066_51934554.1500259119290 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
OK. I assumed P0586R0 was a published paper.=C2=A0 It soun= ds like it should be D0586R0 for the time being then.

On Sunday, Jul= y 16, 2017 at 2:47:42 PM UTC-7, Nicol Bolas wrote:


On Sunday, July 16, 2017 at 2:= 56:43 PM UTC-4, John McFarlane wrote:
On Sunday, July 16, 2017 at 1:00:18 AM UTC-7, federic= o...@gmail.com wrote:
Another update to the proposal,

I've added the referenc= es to Robert Ramey's proposal (and a link to an alternative implementat= ion of the comparison functions in his github repository) and Herb Sutter&#= 39;s proposal for operator<=3D>.

Hi Fe= derico,

I took a quick look at this revision and had a few comments.=

If this document has changed by more than a few minor fix-ups, you = should probably give it a different paper number to avoid confusion. It is = no longer revision #0.=C2=A0 I /think/ the correct approach is to call it D= 0586R1 until you've finished revising it and then submit it as P0586R1.= =C2=A0 (But I'm usually wrong!)

I = think the R numbers are for published papers. I've yet to see an R1 wit= hout a published R0, even though sometimes they're published in the sam= e mailing.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposa= ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.= com/a/isocpp.org/d/msgid/std-proposals/c126f65a-e607-4fc8-bc4e-f95d541140ca= %40isocpp.org.
------=_Part_1066_51934554.1500259119290-- ------=_Part_1065_1223749780.1500259119290-- .