220 29563 article Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Domen Vrankar Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Instantiation of default destructor Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 21:21:35 +0100 Lines: 71 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <2895021.stej6Iglf8@tjmaciei-mobl1> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114fce3a5129f70542623af3 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1480364547 22453 195.159.176.226 (28 Nov 2016 20:22:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 20:22:27 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCHJ3Z4NUUFBB6VD6LAQKGQE7CT2KVI@isocpp.org Mon Nov 28 21:22:20 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-qt0-f200.google.com ([209.85.216.200]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cBSRL-0004Et-VA for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 21:22:16 +0100 Original-Received: by mail-qt0-f200.google.com with SMTP id j49sf99018162qta.1 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:22:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isocpp-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=pPGOGgHeZhBZmMzvQoRrSCCLJyfsquhnfCwBOO11SyE=; b=SwNEtScwphcd0fV0WVcEKqMn4pyoi4+QVZltP4iM6pJVvu/kE8C5QVp7WOvbTej0E9 lwpJb1qmD/ydhz7AV4Z1Pxzsky0+t16lJJNraJXC2NRTl0K7W92+26fqduzh/iAC5FmB mSq5KfVN7vX3v364D7UBX2wpdp8t1izbXhXdR7QNtJszW2aRFc7q1pK/cSwXMsb+rU/K FfJglMRy828Fc0TlhRvTHH7qJ5tYJlH43zMbT2K75F6N5JLx+oNO2NXfXb2g0qRV8Ddj 8xyKcu8PUzeJiwglxuEB2zQbp12TDwx9SiBaYsQsNnIuKCIbAya18MBUw82EdlRx3GvB LC8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=pPGOGgHeZhBZmMzvQoRrSCCLJyfsquhnfCwBOO11SyE=; b=QxigXJuS7kAKupQqUnd+cVBlVz4xCluoApcwvCET3z4WqEkI5/wug8itzwysx48i23 B37Tq4FggexNGQtoCs/+ZTf3a+abB+FNtJl+PacN469QaNRxTR5HBWXGB2flaxS4nn26 Z64+6B/3U88OyD0aQ29jFXPBegEXT+YB5Bdffv/Bg7swpAUoWgP2q1X9BTiThkPBGJPU 5VrZmB85uArpnuSFxn2/1latfOvC7b2kk2+VHscbUqlwCm+JF2mjCkxVB4bUC9eoP+7L zogIajB3pMd7WogBj4+RLbxQlp8QSGeGFsqmRq2wYIsgfxaVBB6Oa++n9xg4ZC/N84+j 0LsA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00vZ+selKbm2+FPGwaMZunGEEXSeeBl5N2i/lmjBT6OWA3kttacyPTLf8IQkj54Vg== X-Received: by 10.200.52.48 with SMTP id u45mr4618280qtb.25.1480364539551; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:22:19 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.36.120.146 with SMTP id p140ls3422263itc.14.gmail; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:22:16 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.36.60.7 with SMTP id m7mr20275495ita.7.1480364536559; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:22:16 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from mail-io0-x22b.google.com (mail-io0-x22b.google.com. [2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22b]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l8si41610699ioa.2.2016.11.28.12.22.16 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:22:16 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of domen.vrankar@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22b as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22b; Original-Received: by mail-io0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id m5so113373118ioe.3 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:22:16 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.107.20.77 with SMTP id 74mr20394868iou.66.1480364536175; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:22:16 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.50.235.15 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:21:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2895021.stej6Iglf8@tjmaciei-mobl1> X-Original-Sender: Domen.Vrankar@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of domen.vrankar@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22b as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=domen.vrankar@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:29563 Archived-At: --001a114fce3a5129f70542623af3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2016-11-28 20:42 GMT+01:00 Thiago Macieira : > On segunda-feira, 28 de novembro de 2016 20:17:12 PST Domen Vrankar wrote: > > A::A(int i) {} // implementation of the first constructor so destructor > is > > generated here as if writing A::~A() = default; after this line > > Your comment makes an invalid assumption. The destructor is not generated > there. > Lost me... Where then? Meaning 'not generated there currently' or 'not generated there even if A::~A() = default; would be written there' as this was not meant as how it works now but what I've proposed. I always expected that that's the point where compiler prepares the destructor is the point where it finds it in the code. Regards, Domen -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/d/msgid/std-proposals/CAKgx6BL5vumvSnaTPm2HW%3D72hGnEV4p%3DWBCZTSueWHOO6-_icA%40mail.gmail.com. --001a114fce3a5129f70542623af3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2016-11-28 20:42 GMT+01:00 Thiago Macieira <thiago@maci= eira.org>:
On segunda-feira, 28= de novembro de 2016 20:17:12 PST Domen Vrankar wrote:
> A::A(int i) {} // implementation of the first constructor so destructo= r is
> generated here as if writing A::~A() =3D default; after this line

Your comment makes an invalid assumption. The destructor is not gene= rated
there.

Lost me... Where then? Meaning &= #39;not generated there currently' or 'not generated there even if = A::~A() =3D default; would be written there' as this was not meant as h= ow it works now but what I've proposed.
I always expected= that that's the point where compiler prepares the destructor is the po= int where it finds it in the code.

Regards,
Domen

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposa= ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/d/msgid/std-proposals/CAKgx6BL5vumv= SnaTPm2HW%3D72hGnEV4p%3DWBCZTSueWHOO6-_icA%40mail.gmail.com.
--001a114fce3a5129f70542623af3-- .