220 29492 <20161119215957.GA18472@noemi> article
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Magnus Fromreide <magfr@lysator.liu.se>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals
Subject: P0067R4 and C
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 22:59:57 +0100
Lines: 26
Approved: news@gmane.org
Message-ID: <20161119215957.GA18472@noemi>
Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1479592804 4362 195.159.176.226 (19 Nov 2016 22:00:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 22:00:04 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)
To: Standard Proposals <std-proposals@isocpp.org>
Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBDELLREETMBRBX4WYPAQKGQEI4GNSSQ@isocpp.org Sat Nov 19 22:59:57 2016
Return-path: <std-proposals+bncBDELLREETMBRBX4WYPAQKGQEI4GNSSQ@isocpp.org>
Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f71.google.com ([74.125.82.71])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <std-proposals+bncBDELLREETMBRBX4WYPAQKGQEI4GNSSQ@isocpp.org>)
	id 1c8Dfx-0008Af-44
	for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 22:59:57 +0100
Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f71.google.com with SMTP id a20sf15652246wme.5
        for <gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org>; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 14:00:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=isocpp-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:mime-version
         :content-disposition:user-agent:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe;
        bh=SR9LCQtwjCHiXviTRBRwGTumG5HXeUqUGomrQvvKEKQ=;
        b=ro1evFAhe032NN3J2YRKTCyCvjG/MHFgRl2+7XkHHYC5dDcGnlS+SzL6qBZ8jq6upG
         CL4aA+DE2J8nQnRXIJf/00jy34ycvuoDw9CP3CFV4tzmwRJKinaCGPrwnQnLlxxvde4f
         X9a/UaXLI2ijPGUSVSHMM/yWCp6mDKdXH6zblTpmL4oEBZctRUbTa+wbb8qLPVtgt8in
         odptygE/tnlyP2s96aNBKw8yhFfHm3SW6ygaOlIVmay07KCeYYyREhxSJvc2qU+z9z8f
         mZE1fVapikcHEEiXw6XZhVq4xYyxz8ZNzkbFaS5/bNausNOmqXeO3jCRTKPcth+TLc9i
         AC2Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to
         :mime-version:content-disposition:user-agent:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe;
        bh=SR9LCQtwjCHiXviTRBRwGTumG5HXeUqUGomrQvvKEKQ=;
        b=i5wcFsUV0aKZ1XAbghqnxtqNGeFDhDTU8l6tZuaVTYbVk8g0mO7XlBNBwZu6qkVgIC
         eKkb+Acuj0qYuXmRfqZyQRLkvR6hesY5L0a+SxF/6Eu1IYOKe9/m2VwIekQG5kRjw1Yv
         xzIlPwCqjYNCYJTJ07znZLi8cnvCfd7IH7+9gMXNDxASrvIMgnVW8l5hxCxR2RQzTAZn
         g3l6KfmBx2gu3mCFnyjlgfvo+Ma9QWzK3Ky6jOLDvhSe1D03TgLh6jHp/nuec0/8si+s
         jR4dRD8ZUPDF7VL7VKpentuhewc23zgMcewlUlsdVCFQVYnEP+nEkQAwY2lI2ILxCxLO
         DDhA 
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03e+vvlm659KcEjS601STVE6qtENcNLwWMIGuL9vy/183hLtcPHSoWWzH5/E4j6zA==
X-Received: by 10.46.7.17 with SMTP id 17mr938126ljh.15.1479592800576;
        Sat, 19 Nov 2016 14:00:00 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org
Original-Received: by 10.25.43.18 with SMTP id r18ls70581lfr.34.gmail; Sat, 19 Nov 2016
 13:59:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.25.43.69 with SMTP id r66mr1593228lfr.158.1479592799287;
        Sat, 19 Nov 2016 13:59:59 -0800 (PST)
Original-Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (mail.lysator.liu.se. [2001:6b0:17:f0a0::3])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c74si5517305lfg.262.2016.11.19.13.59.59
        for <std-proposals@isocpp.org>
        (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Sat, 19 Nov 2016 13:59:59 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of magfr@lysator.liu.se designates 2001:6b0:17:f0a0::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2001:6b0:17:f0a0::3;
Original-Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B52940017
	for <std-proposals@isocpp.org>; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 22:59:59 +0100 (CET)
Original-Received: from noemi (h-176-10-249-241.na.cust.bahnhof.se [176.10.249.241])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D67ED40015
	for <std-proposals@isocpp.org>; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 22:59:58 +0100 (CET)
Mail-Followup-To: Standard Proposals <std-proposals@isocpp.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-Original-Sender: magfr@lysator.liu.se
X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;       spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of magfr@lysator.liu.se designates 2001:6b0:17:f0a0::3 as permitted
 sender) smtp.mailfrom=magfr@lysator.liu.se
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org
List-ID: <std-proposals.isocpp.org>
X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710
List-Post: <https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/post>, <mailto:std-proposals@isocpp.org>
List-Help: <https://support.google.com/a/isocpp.org/bin/topic.py?topic=25838>, <mailto:std-proposals+help@isocpp.org>
List-Archive: <https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/>
List-Subscribe: <https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/subscribe>,
 <mailto:std-proposals+subscribe@isocpp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+399137483710+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>,
 <https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/subscribe>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:29492
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals/29492>

Hello.

I recently looked at P0067R4 (Elementary string conversions, revision 4),
especially the versions that take a base argument, and noticed that the
interfaces specified in that paper would work equally well in C if one
replaces the std::error_code member in the result of from_string with an
int that contains 0, EINVAL or ERANGE.

Now, the embarrasment that the paper sets out to address exist in C just as
much as in C++, even if they have slightly fewer old ways to do it, so,
have there been any interest from WG14 in it?

Are they even aware of it?

Additionally, have there been any more forward progress with this since Oulo,
like it beeing included in the current committe draft? (R3 is listed as
adopted but not R4)

/MF

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/d/msgid/std-proposals/20161119215957.GA18472%40noemi.

.
