220 28827 <575c7b95-217c-4139-be7a-26b99ab4a126@isocpp.org> article Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: FrankHB1989 Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: GUI Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 04:06:17 -0700 (PDT) Lines: 112 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: <575c7b95-217c-4139-be7a-26b99ab4a126@isocpp.org> References: <8e7ef2a9-cc07-41bf-b802-6e7ea795f880@isocpp.org> <45d02760-81b8-4039-b306-75266197b420@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_1048_1210783638.1476443178013" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1476443210 4598 195.159.176.226 (14 Oct 2016 11:06:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 11:06:50 +0000 (UTC) To: ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCTJVBPG3QIBBK7YQLAAKGQEXNJWKBY@isocpp.org Fri Oct 14 13:06:45 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-vk0-f72.google.com ([209.85.213.72]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bv0Jj-0006Pm-QJ for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:06:23 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-vk0-f72.google.com with SMTP id 83sf82784809vkd.3 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 04:06:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isocpp-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=JKnDPbkpHdt/+TnHJubELDgDEcnCzLUQBK/6yfR+Igw=; b=g+MpYtw0um4iF5chk/fvjEdD+jAuAAexjeZnTsSAgKoyHJljJagccyfK0664tSPLQt +m3WZuhMgPBdz74z4HY2LQOnY8UFSE3lhQa23CDlpRdRu9SB6PGGPfuK6zwb/ZpWHZfr PauzZW4HRKT+IfygnANWXPBg02wqlMsUe6BMJ5R/x7yfmb6CIA/p6fKE1VOEtbI+/FUY Td45EIYllB0q1mCxXQ39XMTPz0KTglK2VAfyn7TTvEYAmd6F8RpeqMAkT/DiVakHOob8 AHBts56dFMsb+ks5ovb74mEHsar5+jI6wSvs2vlUrYv8fDLtooKPdEN9BFszuI5O9cMm HcZw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=JKnDPbkpHdt/+TnHJubELDgDEcnCzLUQBK/6yfR+Igw=; b=k2xjv6wjfuNS7fU1IIN13kMRo4KJiU0dEsxUHQIoKXFKsPnpUA1fH9z754oEzwdkfi OAthkOvZjKrWHbYJE5kj7iY01p8gqv+7z9uFTHZKXSN8Qk7dGQvu33z6/mGwJu/fa3Cp 8ADAKSgqW1uuWwoBkNHsCJy1+fJiFoPbVCVKiL4MHOuzfmLV/a/qmi00Dgqq0yHWyof4 WXHEvfxZ1tpbXpZi5KMubhmJt8YhrxDRYQ0eA15Gxj7oUVOwD7+mjvvuZDScMlqi40FO XNxoKMhrRrnqfkYkxe9M78n0+TVce0BXDugGmeB7OxiU46+RRZ/7nOdhVW7mUwT9bAls 1OcA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence :mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help :list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=JKnDPbkpHdt/+TnHJubELDgDEcnCzLUQBK/6yfR+Igw=; b=AJP4DA0DyB9dcQqBIk40+3ilay2Cl4BaS6aY08JQnzgduBZuEyX/h8owNTf9izB8xE 47T4glK9HSAEYcUMSVLYxlv6DpK0M9OH/HWx8M5G2gMxsfCFyeDGyUu8C4+u8V1lmGqd kAPoUxLAJYunGvza+1gRdBvL1BW7hSqs+O0m0ww5t0hAZTcensRAFJ4pRIJFwfv2qb1A yimD4tz8hSAz9HWbbWK4+OUSGv+7smS5YijWNyohowgemGCoKXtgoPnw9kArXvm02B6L 6Oq9k8y28gUf1GIB9DpDi7Jb0jxVqEIDUajjReJcz92G+h3hZQm77eGjUEcIayDL6xmW l2nA== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RlwIKv4Pz3dBK5tsA3fsa9OnNtvLbCrRt1LBXZZ7S0+HUNiBUvcD11eYOAdgNK2Aw== X-Received: by 10.31.169.22 with SMTP id s22mr2938816vke.34.1476443185681; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 04:06:25 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.107.141.15 with SMTP id p15ls3001242iod.36.gmail; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 04:06:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.36.77.75 with SMTP id l72mr102888itb.1.1476443178973; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 04:06:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: frankhb1989@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:28827 Archived-At: ------=_Part_1048_1210783638.1476443178013 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1049_1910611188.1476443178013" ------=_Part_1049_1910611188.1476443178013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =E5=9C=A8 2016=E5=B9=B410=E6=9C=8812=E6=97=A5=E6=98=9F=E6=9C=9F=E4=B8=89 UT= C+8=E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=886:54:53=EF=BC=8CVille Voutilainen=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF= =BC=9A > > On 12 October 2016 at 13:50, Victor Dyachenko=20 > > wrote:=20 > > For C++ we have at least Qt and wxWigets. Why do we need to put them=20 > into=20 > > I don't recall anyone suggesting putting Qt or wxWidgets into the=20 > standard.=20 > > At least Qt is not fit here, definitely. Technically you have to do toooo= o=20 much work to work around with [intro.refs], for example. =20 > > Standard? To have big deprecated parts in the Standard in the future?= =20 > > Why would such deprecation be necessary?=20 > > > Why don't we have universal GUI library in C++? Because there is no the= =20 > only=20 > > way to implement GUI.=20 > > There's not only one way to implement most of the standard library,=20 > which is one reason why=20 > it doesn't mandate any particular implementation, so that's a non-issue.= =20 > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp= ..org/d/msgid/std-proposals/575c7b95-217c-4139-be7a-26b99ab4a126%40isocpp.or= g. ------=_Part_1049_1910611188.1476443178013 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=E5=9C=A8 2016=E5=B9=B410=E6=9C=8812=E6=97=A5=E6= =98=9F=E6=9C=9F=E4=B8=89 UTC+8=E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=886:54:53=EF=BC=8CVille Vouti= lainen=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A
On 12 October 2016 at 13:50, Victor Dyachenko
<victor.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For C++ we have at least Qt and wxWigets. Why do we need to put th= em into

I don't recall anyone suggesting putting Qt or wxWidgets into the s= tandard.

At least Qt is not fit here, definitely. Technically = you have to do=20 tooooo much work to work around with [intro.refs], for example.

=C2= =A0
> Standard? To hav= e big deprecated parts in the Standard in the future?

Why would such deprecation be necessary?

> Why don't we have universal GUI library in C++? Because there = is no the only
> way to implement GUI.

There's not only one way to implement most of the standard library,
which is one reason why
it doesn't mandate any particular implementation, so that's a n= on-issue.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposa= ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.= com/a/isocpp.org/d/msgid/std-proposals/575c7b95-217c-4139-be7a-26b99ab4a126= %40isocpp.org.
------=_Part_1049_1910611188.1476443178013-- ------=_Part_1048_1210783638.1476443178013-- .