220 27827 article Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Zhihao Yuan Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: make_array and brace-init list. Should this be a defect or I am wrong...? Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:48:43 -0500 Lines: 22 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1471632531 17563 195.159.176.226 (19 Aug 2016 18:48:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 18:48:51 +0000 (UTC) To: "std-proposals@isocpp.org" Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCSKRWMD4EHBBDNJ3W6QKGQEI4JXZQA@isocpp.org Fri Aug 19 20:48:47 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-oi0-f69.google.com ([209.85.218.69]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1baoqT-00048H-Nm for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 20:48:45 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-f69.google.com with SMTP id p18sf143155123oic.0 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:48:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=9AGiDecCyE1D3d1RCxdHfrUEBN13Ql3s1HSPZMh1XTk=; b=M83z2uSnQ12e4/7R0ufyqL0AH/DZ3FPDefx6l5byxfPxYSrvu1BlENeUF/Z3k0Ey69 W0Q6kMiQCnrAaajsDlsTHxgHcXBdsjj47eYVwM3N0Mmg34zUnEOR5bCiSt1Mo2m7ZxaM aNZouQTBRrdNAUEzhech8i0O9hYxafqgX+gHyI6tVflbIe3W4c338t/6JV+tYJApWX88 uTna19YGRAMUOtzcIvVbQk50L6Kmv2kpr9cYtEMCFOZZMIJhBbWuBmyl4jFyRsbcFaLO phLRmQ9n7/202FHMcoXIhMGzL8pOmcPpuzeEqhn1lYfwB9JMbkkXIMTjhx9yMzfN9mc7 /1Ng== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvqjE+uOgZpbS9UC4OlGwabLjFGe9GQ1VmucQXWSXW8gFKkLEpV3w9P7zWfFf888w== X-Received: by 10.157.46.85 with SMTP id c21mr6797943otd.24.1471632526133; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:48:46 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.157.24.71 with SMTP id t7ls4609261ott.5.gmail; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:48:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.237.37.99 with SMTP id w32mr10397148qtc.59.1471632525211; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:48:45 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-s68.mailgun.info (mail-s68.mailgun.info. [184.173.153.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y22si5490088qkb.170.2016.08.19.11.48.45 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:48:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of bounce+3f9131.69110-std-proposals=isocpp.org@miator.net designates 184.173.153.196 as permitted sender) client-ip=184.173.153.196; Original-Sender: zy@miator.net X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI3MTBkYiIsICJzdGQtcHJvcG9zYWxzQGlzb2NwcC5vcmciLCAiNjkxMTAiXQ== Original-Received: from mail-ua0-f176.google.com (mail-ua0-f176.google.com [209.85.217.176]) by mxa.mailgun.org with ESMTP id 57b7548c.7f10e42114f0-in6; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 18:48:44 -0000 (UTC) Original-Received: by mail-ua0-f176.google.com with SMTP id n59so94948560uan.2 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:48:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.176.64.133 with SMTP id i5mr5047360uad.49.1471632523880; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:48:43 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.176.68.33 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:48:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Sender: zy@miator.net X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@miator.net; spf=pass (google.com: domain of bounce+3f9131.69110-std-proposals=isocpp.org@miator.net designates 184.173.153.196 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bounce+3f9131.69110-std-proposals=isocpp.org@miator.net Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:27827 Archived-At: On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:15 PM, S.B. wrote: > I think it's CWG 1591 (Deducing array bound and element type from > initializer list) that makes this use valid. Interesting. And the rvalue reference overload is really demanded right now, to enable to_array>({ std::make_unique(3) }) -- Zhihao Yuan, ID lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___________________________________________________ 4BSD -- http://blog.miator.net/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/d/msgid/std-proposals/CAGsORuAAdBg7vek7o4v7Gm3VvLBM-vWaC957iUy%2By5tmhAAz4g%40mail.gmail.com. .