220 27334 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nevin Liber Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: Relocation as a solution for the valueless variant problem? Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 20:52:35 -0500 Lines: 57 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113e9346a7b9ee0538a86506 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1469670798 16570 80.91.229.3 (28 Jul 2016 01:53:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 01:53:18 +0000 (UTC) To: "std-proposals@isocpp.org" Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCE35H5S6IDBBC6L4W6AKGQEMPF2IVY@isocpp.org Thu Jul 28 03:53:18 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-qt0-f197.google.com ([209.85.216.197]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bSaVh-0003oP-MJ for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 03:53:17 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-qt0-f197.google.com with SMTP id 101sf27172230qtb.0 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 18:53:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=rYvn9ETFus/3Ef+cCquT7lb80fyXJEhaJ4zKEa/DoBE=; b=DcFZYes1TjHCQ/EH33X7N3bM2h0GZAJ8jd4ZvkY8EXhPta5wpUp4nMoZfINXVpbWuJ j6AdxZy7ZMergJCwktjMLiORGH2D1l6OJWvTeb/0PEfglHAjw0bqe8ctVmKbSeecFv2T JWkztW6/fO+JGtr7oLVh31Bs521dBu6x/H+LIE8cpk5SmTAy7352yiW+41Un4nFU8Ub3 68r46O1D44JBp3Ctkt7TlCKOP6g2Kd21A6Irfu0HvKn8StxNJuJKHZcBo8V+dOPJ9KHd kIYSxZb0bAXr3Lnp/cMTJ7Dp494+Iv4wOPAO8anYmtKTdUusNqn85OPCxxEW4+kXepdO Y0nA== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouty9D/FGoeG/Q1KPOVvnwo9OiZiPbowKDhxEnEg6b6n2PsW/Vbz5DFcUJOzNpf8+A== X-Received: by 10.129.131.70 with SMTP id t67mr20415315ywf.28.1469670795844; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 18:53:15 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.157.51.59 with SMTP id f56ls2910381otc.4.gmail; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 18:53:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.202.74.205 with SMTP id x196mr18719584oia.74.1469670795162; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 18:53:15 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x22f.google.com (mail-oi0-x22f.google.com. [2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22f]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t184si6864939oif.194.2016.07.27.18.53.15 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Jul 2016 18:53:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nliber@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22f as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22f; Original-Received: by mail-oi0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id l72so43560114oig.2 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 18:53:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.157.42.48 with SMTP id t45mr19394993ota.6.1469670794703; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 18:53:14 -0700 (PDT) Original-Sender: nliber@gmail.com Original-Received: by 10.157.34.134 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 18:52:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: nevin@eviloverlord.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nliber@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22f as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=nliber@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: std-proposals@isocpp.org X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:27334 Archived-At: --001a113e9346a7b9ee0538a86506 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 27 July 2016 at 20:44, wrote: > Here is another option: require move constructors to be noexcept for use > in variants. > We've been through that argument already. Multiple times. It never gained consensus. -- Nevin ":-)" Liber +1-847-691-1404 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/d/msgid/std-proposals/CAGg_6%2BOVfW-3R6D%3Dq3VBrFpLCiU8%3DYVgVSRQtCcnxAG6kDWSmw%40mail.gmail.com. --001a113e9346a7b9ee0538a86506 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 27 July 2016 at 20:44, <demiobenour@gmail.com> wrote:
Here is another option: re= quire move constructors to be noexcept for use in variants.

We've been through that argument already. =C2= =A0 Multiple times.=C2=A0 It never gained consensus.
--
=C2= =A0Nevin ":-)" Liber=C2=A0 <mailto:nevin@eviloverlord.com> =C2=A0+1-84= 7-691-1404

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposa= ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/d/msgid/std-proposals/CAGg_6%2BOV= fW-3R6D%3Dq3VBrFpLCiU8%3DYVgVSRQtCcnxAG6kDWSmw%40mail.gmail.com.
--001a113e9346a7b9ee0538a86506-- .