220 27257 <463de12d-f1f8-418a-a300-c39b8a861fcd@isocpp.org> article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: gmisocpp@gmail.com Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: loop continuation code Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 14:37:12 -0700 (PDT) Lines: 106 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: <463de12d-f1f8-418a-a300-c39b8a861fcd@isocpp.org> References: <2f575934-e078-411c-9c8a-c2996da7609d@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_5398_1940599692.1469482633076" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1469482636 28999 80.91.229.3 (25 Jul 2016 21:37:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 21:37:16 +0000 (UTC) To: ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCM3TRNUXUDBBCMN3K6AKGQEVO4IWRQ@isocpp.org Mon Jul 25 23:37:16 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-yw0-f198.google.com ([209.85.161.198]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bRnYp-00011V-KQ for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 23:37:15 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-yw0-f198.google.com with SMTP id j12sf343956862ywb.3 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 14:37:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isocpp-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=QZ1iyPfBilDB+12yCUqlUCTo2DKkoBJTH79r2vJFTc8=; b=lOoQ/JvMkbFpq/1jBarnFPrJ928RmGir4wO1Sbqshb8Repx7f0pAU3YFfUNQK0+ROn 1kZ70HzwDl2jsc/rHZuZdk1/fIpA2rwvut4UaDwr/tsuDWqqz1XkUmTA6czqEPuQ+PIr 3OqJWywa0/VumK7oIkV4r0B6tnwq/dZi9a/OZYfzYxKZASA44Amzuw2ZSPBV05nteZcC 0/BHvnpkAgrS5LmzfjEYjkJ5xyF/I4FIuA3XrhVTXpJmZk8wmFLEpCRJcMUO+B9itUI3 MRrWVem9YLR8zl2YJNWgQb/tI72RGmg8TQXW1tX+nIhFUSN7fI0+UrsSXM4KdWwue0mM b+Xg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=QZ1iyPfBilDB+12yCUqlUCTo2DKkoBJTH79r2vJFTc8=; b=P62Zj/cFcxXv449OM3mbuco4aDrjg8chkjNTegOAxe65w6+Ev/go7yOuakKVg9aCSf 0rvVPfQQmt7r8dUhzuNwbBGOJ6UXWt1fMMtguvqgkebC9/0GCKZhZcJv9n/sMmgXifnf aMbHjY/JirNswp7MXYgluSpNcpWjJDL1aPqbd2jxRq93Cziiyv0OXTMBnW0k+F7kylKz t+K2n7ruSpDf84sVWU/3H6Dgx0SkDp4IMQMCYQmFBFi0OnPmpJCO7/WTmcuN6DR2fPhP qa7JGdHRn/uFGBemGtRYFalNBrSJ1FFW4Nsdlct2SLtCeKy8LvETRhZ8HKuikHHB7lji dnpQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence :mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help :list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=QZ1iyPfBilDB+12yCUqlUCTo2DKkoBJTH79r2vJFTc8=; b=TjI6iCai54lSYeFBTz0sv6T8EUJG1ZnKbuAF9RmvzuPjTu2UiKdiQMYp3ZBBaQkIcA uEjfo/HOHcVQ/dc73xNtKuIFf7ipujArkWuw4b8XPKC9ayRentXVC34FSwlFYQROK9SU r15CS00ubXN41X+njPlFIKPwmje/AsVcA4hvQYdk/wZFSwCtmvlTxpBv5KlooUS470J6 o+hh7VWQOMlQ1xt+HrzO4oBKQRQQbkup9MCNe4W9ADp400Qmha01oJNARSHC7IWv0xcR T+as7FWZmLdHwrnNso4WUqyx4yhhz/XP83pGXhgG169gm0kmywfV8qJP3i3EVfcKnALv By7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvkA3cd9m8v4+K1SA4x90fzxs1wAtA+fP0FBnQIpV8t4oBpcS/HmoZSIkbbjx71mQ== X-Received: by 10.129.55.88 with SMTP id e85mr17719732ywa.29.1469482634662; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 14:37:14 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.36.3.17 with SMTP id e17ls724541ite.21.canary; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 14:37:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.36.20.201 with SMTP id 192mr3361431itg.8.1469482633556; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 14:37:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: gmisocpp@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: std-proposals@isocpp.org X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:27257 Archived-At: ------=_Part_5398_1940599692.1469482633076 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_5399_311818761.1469482633076" ------=_Part_5399_311818761.1469482633076 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday, July 25, 2016 at 9:18:31 PM UTC+12, D. B. wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Jonathan M=C3=BCller > wrote: > >> How is that a duplicate? That proposal wants different code executed on= =20 >> the various *break* conditions, this on a *continue*. He even mentions t= hat=20 >> proposal(s). >> > It seems like a direct extension of the same idea, and lorro mentioned=20 > continue in that proposal while discussing how it's quite open-ended in= =20 > terms of all the 'catch blocks' it could potentially handle. But ymmv. > > That thread seemed more focused on the break aspect and I'm more focused on= =20 continue side so I'm obviously reading it the same way as the Jonathan did.= =20 You can talk about either in either thread if you want, if you're saying=20 something useful. But I'd suggest talking break there and continue here,=20 especially as I think the problems being addressed warrant their own=20 threads in any case (not that I care strongly). I mainly raised the other= =20 thread to alert people that we want to avoid a syntax for either=20 problem that blocks the other. I'm interested in what you actually think of= =20 the problems at hand wherever you want to discuss it? --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp= ..org/d/msgid/std-proposals/463de12d-f1f8-418a-a300-c39b8a861fcd%40isocpp.or= g. ------=_Part_5399_311818761.1469482633076 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Monday, July 25, 2016 at 9:18:31 PM UTC+12, D. = B. wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Jonathan M=C3=BCller <jonathanm...@gmail.com> wrote:

How is that a duplicate? That proposal wants = different code executed on the various *break* conditions, this on a *conti= nue*. He even mentions that proposal(s).

It seems=C2= =A0like a direct=C2=A0extension of the same idea, and=C2=A0lorro mentioned = continue in that proposal while discussing how it's quite open-ended in= terms of all the 'catch blocks' it could potentially handle. But y= mmv.


That thread=C2=A0seemed more=C2=A0focused on the break aspect=C2=A0and I&#= 39;m more focused on continue=C2=A0side so I'm obviously reading it the= same way as the Jonathan did. You can talk about either in either thread i= f you want, if you're saying something useful.=C2=A0But I'd suggest= talking break there and continue here, especially as=C2=A0I think the prob= lems being addressed warrant their own threads in any case (not that I care= strongly).=C2=A0I mainly raised the other thread=C2=A0to alert people=C2= =A0that we want to=C2=A0avoid=C2=A0a syntax=C2=A0for either problem=C2=A0th= at blocks the=C2=A0other. I'm interested in what you actually think of = the problems at hand wherever you want to discuss it?

<= /div>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposa= ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.= com/a/isocpp.org/d/msgid/std-proposals/463de12d-f1f8-418a-a300-c39b8a861fcd= %40isocpp.org.
------=_Part_5399_311818761.1469482633076-- ------=_Part_5398_1940599692.1469482633076-- .