220 26466 <75c5e493-a6b8-4b92-ba25-5081134961b9@isocpp.org> article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: asorenji@gmail.com Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: iswalpha and locales Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 09:15:43 -0700 (PDT) Lines: 72 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: <75c5e493-a6b8-4b92-ba25-5081134961b9@isocpp.org> References: <5057e854-b2ea-4c39-81c7-367bc3e54080@isocpp.org> <17488222.rMpkCkuuuJ@tjmaciei-mobl1> <02b09fd2-26d0-44cb-8b24-3d23eb836cdc@isocpp.org> <2051984.gaFSOGh1sJ@tjmaciei-mobl1> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_3006_186558894.1467130543383" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1467130548 6054 80.91.229.3 (28 Jun 2016 16:15:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:15:48 +0000 (UTC) To: ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBDSYF7ODTYPBBMGFZK5QKGQEDLWSRKY@isocpp.org Tue Jun 28 18:15:48 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-io0-f199.google.com ([209.85.223.199]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bHvfu-00054A-L6 for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:15:46 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f199.google.com with SMTP id g13sf41737717ioj.3 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 09:15:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isocpp-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=shw2JvHfUoLJMMvySHKsOqfsIV0krTVF8yvbM5kpUME=; b=Kdn0WikTazrrZhzS5curnMyq1eTe80FSWjU0+4e2vdyxBC6MKripjFY9ZKQMHmRkMA BkoDr1M0Xr8ToGqRo0/fQwTCpggpTLiGPT7b4nrUWC681y+jpzHfr2iO9DSuElwZyDRu lJMxsR5/dfi/93BxmCWd69ubbUosuujvU0EVMq1ddv3CeJiqHnSrEHNdMWMzQ0XiyJma 4Y6dQOYYmlK0YNssLJhZxrbIyOWvN2KeHonGaM3q7cskL0+URVqmjwPnec7pn2swlGdw 0+q76tyYas674jkTW0WUOcDIUxBexVnXGZJqQtAaCnUT8zIQuSu24MUNkmgRr7e/5yc/ xNLQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=shw2JvHfUoLJMMvySHKsOqfsIV0krTVF8yvbM5kpUME=; b=Y+Fxqfqq/hKKww+biG6GJ004JsPdEMcl0uz8MggyDCFm/INq19RpkHycX6uIxcVdG7 sCummHEoAyaviHXAsFZDzuO5UBuQao/thep0QYWj0p3HHG7YFJkFMzSLaNHbaR+eW1ty SKM36Ui5z0gOTwMbzk3XtT0AgB9ilnoBl3sxGapo853ev6jNHbVochtX0saCWiFg0j2d dhiWp73r0gwCf49VCftt0cZtf8JDTHqSi5wPUO++D7ANadVKJrz8tQwEhnt3hldb+hMR ToMGtABw83GJ8ZS/Yw889Bqzcu/d2SuSZ2U9yGItMxeaSAnnIiCINVVdtzZ1lCFwyH/N +ASw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence :mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help :list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=shw2JvHfUoLJMMvySHKsOqfsIV0krTVF8yvbM5kpUME=; b=KRdKaFvOJg36vewIIToJM7GO06J3ruOUnPA8BTssa5+u5zho9Yq6iNSZ04iHuFU/mZ Q4/SjuOj0GJELsiz1KsVsAG7iVY6Y+IIDc3qM0wnzvdmmzNo4PAzpDiE3QkoFFO2fEPm yPm3VmLpwjsYrbJKu6ldMWS7ovRvp6UU304dM4hfVNMfFGMDjWD3XomSvUQr+vUcRDwi EPZCFxMQybgKD6IAoreA2K08w6mnbL2K//noeN+X70GbG0RNKhGn0QCYl95RBE7lUVWT mePjgEupE7C+LyCAdrpgtn8mqGqJcPXNxk+APcwHA7qXpQ6crw4ecWad8G+scoV0zNYW jCvw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIP9c6uZ8KUt26Q+3C3xlYPbzplO2l9Lp23WyE931ZUJTCoyCLDiTtYZVef9WFQ4w== X-Received: by 10.36.17.74 with SMTP id 71mr10227541itf.8.1467130545602; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 09:15:45 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.107.128.214 with SMTP id k83ls4791944ioi.54.gmail; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 09:15:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.36.230.69 with SMTP id e66mr441425ith.0.1467130544549; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 09:15:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2051984.gaFSOGh1sJ@tjmaciei-mobl1> X-Original-Sender: AsoRenji@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: std-proposals@isocpp.org X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:26466 Archived-At: ------=_Part_3006_186558894.1467130543383 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3007_524532704.1467130543383" ------=_Part_3007_524532704.1467130543383 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =D0=B2=D1=82=D0=BE=D1=80=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=BA, 28 =D0=B8=D1=8E=D0=BD=D1=8F 201= 6 =D0=B3., 18:01:17 UTC+3 =D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=BB=D1=8C=D0=B7=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=B0= =D1=82=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8C Thiago Macieira=20 =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB: > > > Why can't we require O(1) complexity?=20 > O(1) complexity is not guarantee of fast code. Slow code that slow *always,= *=20 also have O(1) complexity. On the other hand some users have=20 microcontroller with 1M memory. And if we give them fast O(1) code, this=20 code eat significant amount of this 1M. Especially if code must support a= =20 lot of properties. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp= ..org/d/msgid/std-proposals/75c5e493-a6b8-4b92-ba25-5081134961b9%40isocpp.or= g. ------=_Part_3007_524532704.1467130543383 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=D0=B2=D1=82=D0=BE=D1=80=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=BA, 28 =D0= =B8=D1=8E=D0=BD=D1=8F 2016 =D0=B3., 18:01:17 UTC+3 =D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=BB=D1=8C= =D0=B7=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8C Thiago Macieira =D0=BD=D0= =B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB:

Why can't we require O(1) complexity?
O(1) complexity is not guarantee of fast code. Slow c= ode that slow always, also have O(1) complexity. On the other hand= some users have microcontroller with 1M memory. And if we give them fast O= (1) code, this code eat significant amount of this 1M. Especially if code m= ust support a lot of properties.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposa= ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.= com/a/isocpp.org/d/msgid/std-proposals/75c5e493-a6b8-4b92-ba25-5081134961b9= %40isocpp.org.
------=_Part_3007_524532704.1467130543383-- ------=_Part_3006_186558894.1467130543383-- .