220 24613 <nahrvk$ncs$1@ger.gmane.org> article
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Matthew Woehlke <mwoehlke.floss@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals
Subject: Re: throwaway variable
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:56:52 -0500
Lines: 28
Approved: news@gmane.org
Message-ID: <nahrvk$ncs$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <9658e852-6254-4ecf-a6d4-879160d4de7d@isocpp.org> <4389011.vXu2aERc61@tjmaciei-mobl4> <nafn38$a7a$1@ger.gmane.org> <9337425.Of3J9qAeCA@tjmaciei-mobl4> <nafv75$r8v$1@ger.gmane.org> <20160222222145.4898897.37384.5528@gmail.com>
Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456239627 28069 80.91.229.3 (23 Feb 2016 15:00:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:00:27 +0000 (UTC)
To: std-proposals@isocpp.org
Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBC37LBFWUIFBB5XHWG3AKGQE4VHM5FY@isocpp.org Tue Feb 23 16:00:20 2016
Return-path: <std-proposals+bncBC37LBFWUIFBB5XHWG3AKGQE4VHM5FY@isocpp.org>
Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f72.google.com ([74.125.82.72])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <std-proposals+bncBC37LBFWUIFBB5XHWG3AKGQE4VHM5FY@isocpp.org>)
	id 1aYERg-0004WZ-Uh
	for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 16:00:13 +0100
Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f72.google.com with SMTP id c200sf61408448wme.0
        for <gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 07:00:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=isocpp-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
        h=to:from:subject:date:lines:message-id:references:mime-version
         :content-transfer-encoding:user-agent:in-reply-to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe;
        bh=uWpmjJ0UP2s9Wi3lDodylZygUGS3d4pmUsQoJutEyA8=;
        b=VwJv45Kr7a1oOTALrNPbXqfmgslAOptb7a5EQ5nUtsE2k+781xUXEPy6KuAuY5mq6N
         NTgzLIvX6QE5mj1BYXfd24FWkoCqU3w4IKJAop0K7i5DY1YKsmNVejb+KIMqDstqmoTO
         GrJCmNKHykufvaa2AqFiogUlBzQgqtQgg7FfEZgitiEuPYEz2vidP0+x7T3FULIqyiKW
         sBZRdqzE6H3RJWUdHdVyJZIPP0XDO+XF+7WOsHswYO/Yx0myZUFxlOuFzA6MFf9glsvx
         vJQq7EBZFUyvKJY886lVsOfzD1o6XD9c8DQWoCLuCuzrYxn5tftllNr5LBUqhh86l2xo 
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:date:lines:message-id:references
         :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:user-agent:in-reply-to
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post
         :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe;
        bh=uWpmjJ0UP2s9Wi3lDodylZygUGS3d4pmUsQoJutEyA8=;
        b=bUU3pSHEW9b/uIxCOmgvWx/klO+g5/62BTLGvk2YZIq4rTsYEDBvYJC8/+5FOlnQ/N
         LP0BxCjRMwlz8DONk0VY4919HFdkaH4DVIXkjt1Co0p5Xh/l8UfCsj/hx6V79MHqRRY4
         AOIC6W7QvkQV4JPxotgUdla3MurHpN++K5ZC5h+OwNJIKyhXGrHUlBphZ9UvfXuB7Wtj
         imKQK0lJXeMRxJkPf1tFRMyQas7fHP5gvmcJODljIHLOLgL52onRISCyzdoiRkF9Bgca
         cwm/Z1Vpq5GJFStpUXmkHqHK5bvub59UHI+RwJOCjZjzNkx/aGOUHXDnc06QQANB 
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQSeMvLmw8Ui50BfHEhWiY3T36lBKerup8Ssg0fQTBvKmzs+3BIwf6ovJHlQGF3Kg==
X-Received: by 10.28.47.140 with SMTP id v134mr1964272wmv.3.1456239607273;
        Tue, 23 Feb 2016 07:00:07 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org
Original-Received: by 10.25.126.3 with SMTP id z3ls478962lfc.54.gmail; Tue, 23 Feb 2016
 07:00:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.112.170.137 with SMTP id am9mr2775477lbc.84.1456239605832;
        Tue, 23 Feb 2016 07:00:05 -0800 (PST)
Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org. [80.91.229.3])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l87si15975052lfi.213.2016.02.23.07.00.05
        for <std-proposals@isocpp.org>
        (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128);
        Tue, 23 Feb 2016 07:00:05 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) client-ip=80.91.229.3;
Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1aYERY-0004Sa-7B
	for std-proposals@isocpp.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 16:00:04 +0100
Original-Received: from tripoint.kitware.com ([66.194.253.20])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <std-proposals@isocpp.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 16:00:04 +0100
Original-Received: from mwoehlke.floss by tripoint.kitware.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <std-proposals@isocpp.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 16:00:04 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
Original-Lines: 17
Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: tripoint.kitware.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
In-Reply-To: <20160222222145.4898897.37384.5528@gmail.com>
X-Original-Sender: mwoehlke.floss@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;       spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as
 permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org;
       dmarc=fail (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org
List-ID: <std-proposals.isocpp.org>
X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: std-proposals@isocpp.org
X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710
List-Post: <https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/post>, <mailto:std-proposals@isocpp.org>
List-Help: <https://support.google.com/a/isocpp.org/bin/topic.py?topic=25838>, <mailto:std-proposals+help@isocpp.org>
List-Archive: <https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/>
List-Subscribe: <https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/subscribe>,
 <mailto:std-proposals+subscribe@isocpp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+399137483710+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>,
 <https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/subscribe>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:24613
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals/24613>

On 2016-02-22 17:21, Tony V E wrote:
> For the issues of backwards compatibility, I think we could use _=20
> (single) with just the additional rule that _ can be used to name
> more than one variable per scope. [...]
>=20
> =E2=80=8ESo if anyone is currently using _ as a variable name - even beyo=
nd
> just construction, it still works.

Besides that I dislike that that's now a "magic identifier", what about
*functions* named `_`?

I'd really prefer `.`... what's wrong with `.`? No one has discussed
that except a vague impression that it's not liked, but no one has said
why...

--=20
Matthew

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp=
..org/d/msgid/std-proposals/nahrvk%24ncs%241%40ger.gmane.org.

.
