220 22640 <3fb62458-fe8f-4e91-91f8-bbea8cfe10a4@isocpp.org> article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lingxi Li Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: Post-assignment operator Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 10:05:55 -0800 (PST) Lines: 95 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: <3fb62458-fe8f-4e91-91f8-bbea8cfe10a4@isocpp.org> References: <253de32d-03bf-486c-98bc-13460d3b7a3c@isocpp.org> <10429e74-d132-4df1-aa52-866c63664471@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_753_1941622502.1447524355855" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447524373 10400 80.91.229.3 (14 Nov 2015 18:06:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 18:06:13 +0000 (UTC) To: ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBC27Z75TZMMBBBHQTWZAKGQEDENQAMI@isocpp.org Sat Nov 14 19:06:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f69.google.com ([209.85.220.69]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZxfD9-0002YS-RV for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 19:06:04 +0100 Original-Received: by padhz14 with SMTP id hz14sf122316229pad.1 for ; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 10:05:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isocpp_org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=T+ufAUVx2fkeLxVcO8uuuKXAP5yEMUXZmRMkmYchdBc=; b=i8e3Q4W58DAff/RvdWUWFu7YQOx/fnr1U5m5mpzLc0VrWERQpGDubd80xBupr2KWoy JGZR1jOXnqGA8u2uW+HFf8jVvBvDg7m2//MIUgB1waYWijw53d0h1qG26fNBCsTMn1vB u8bhERQo0kaf27AORI9sOxSmA2m8VPHsTjpFiLgvJoLIZMeWBuZbuGm9bCg40hxFP36+ seCt663WDx++XM5nrQ/CYeYXjgdyxtbTNq6Ay36Sto+cNqfJAzsY/zZhLRH8A+jB1oX4 xlurrd5+1yJaoFAT6ME6E1DYBY5NpueoNH30+DTd7XTbcfFwWip7I+e2g4LjPM47tOoW eJqQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=T+ufAUVx2fkeLxVcO8uuuKXAP5yEMUXZmRMkmYchdBc=; b=s1RiN6hY7GnLdKvX6iWpLiHMsJluopM5hQpyPZgxuoA3NyLHtfND5gQJkybsZIGgeM jxrZOx2G8Vifq0tfXZc9DTdI5PHJYjrYhDaRmvhgBhDN+aGPnMsBFEfdzX0vCCnkn/Vl 3wuzgqZbwskIu+4jfccIR7SKshEumQ1R/yDuPYCmEiP1YlGEtsCjCPLgTkcUN4Qy3EFK 1pYFGrRT/MrJWS9kP3Gxk1qS2xZ59Kg3SY8a071LGQ7pwrCIbfu1eSkZ03KfYtlKeDWi Kaq1PWYD9QXPUkF/dIufItz+00YIVbVBFS11jNPuZsmUubmYtuEU7WDsnYrMvxEwFWHW GamA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=T+ufAUVx2fkeLxVcO8uuuKXAP5yEMUXZmRMkmYchdBc=; b=DzMSOH7at5GTRLddeFrhObwfhPHcUAeQjBKiNv0XYa5m+c/NC/nhOQlfWEuMDwJ4se aLTbK7L+qtYPI6RLl3Sr4KN4Jp6t/s4QomuyLqWN8CEuqAJQQM+8XhU8nZ/A8ExvAw1z VP1mV9K4uWwNnsZyqbArSNlhECu5kjJOyJP9fxpzcm9reh8pwMCOQFOdBNt29knILLAS Wc2HH6ywkByDEDMZYvDl/+Ylo6sz/U8/cbtsA2XMZpfC3SXpX/0AVA+/+YOJUW1BfHEQ DU5173Mt/mJgDvozGM71W1kxq/12NPs88LLyQt0YB2YMJ9kKjqaV0nyGdDaAWib7D50l lLJw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlby9b00mhPvu/BquMcjmn/tzEN9IcNse0bsNqW1u45ggJMadrzfvlJQNeQRax/FXXz9Ndt X-Received: by 10.66.100.199 with SMTP id fa7mr22604128pab.18.1447524357494; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 10:05:57 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.107.148.198 with SMTP id w189ls703365iod.29.gmail; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 10:05:56 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.50.6.40 with SMTP id x8mr183798igx.0.1447524356544; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 10:05:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: lilingxi.cs@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: std-proposals@isocpp.org X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:22640 Archived-At: ------=_Part_753_1941622502.1447524355855 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_754_405285636.1447524355856" ------=_Part_754_405285636.1447524355856 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've thought about it. There seems to be little information as to how to=20 propose to the C standard, nor is there any ISO C Standard discussion group similar to this one. Any=20 suggestions? On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 1:56:46 AM UTC+8, Daniel Kr=C3=BCgler wrote= : > > 2015-11-14 18:51 GMT+01:00 Lingxi Li >:= =20 > > I have to admit that the `delete ptr;` example is not suitable, cause= =20 > one=20 > > can simply argue the use of an=20 > > RAII smart pointer. As a replacement, consider the following case=20 > concerning=20 > > Windows API:=20 > >=20 > > CloseHandle(handle);=20 > > handle =3D 0;=20 > > Given your actual use cases, I'm wondering why you are not starting=20 > with a request to extend the C standard in this regard?=20 > > - Daniel=20 > --=20 ---=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposa= ls/. ------=_Part_754_405285636.1447524355856 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I've thought about it. There seems to be little inform= ation as to how to propose to the C standard, nor is
there any ISO C Sta= ndard discussion group similar to this one. Any suggestions?

On Sund= ay, November 15, 2015 at 1:56:46 AM UTC+8, Daniel Kr=C3=BCgler wrote:2015-11-14 18:51 GMT+01:00 Lingxi Li= <= lilin...@gmail.com>:
> I have to admit that the `delete ptr;` example is not suitable, ca= use one
> can simply argue the use of an
> RAII smart pointer. As a replacement, consider the following case = concerning
> Windows API:
>
> CloseHandle(handle);
> handle =3D 0;

Given your actual use cases, I'm wondering why you are not starting
with a request to extend the C standard in this regard?

- Daniel

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposa= ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
------=_Part_754_405285636.1447524355856-- ------=_Part_753_1941622502.1447524355855-- .