220 21655 <41738abe-568a-43aa-83b1-d40a8380e0d3@isocpp.org> article
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Gor Nishanov <gornishanov@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals
Subject: Re: is await an extension of the do-notation? (was Re:
 Re: Resumable expressions p0114r0 vs async/await P0057R0)
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 06:25:22 -0700 (PDT)
Lines: 68
Approved: news@gmane.org
Message-ID: <41738abe-568a-43aa-83b1-d40a8380e0d3@isocpp.org>
References: <639f0012-8cb4-4db3-82a6-8d042a3497f9@isocpp.org>
 <401aa118-ed0b-4c7b-92cf-3fbd706eff9d@isocpp.org>
 <fcbcc1c4-535c-4fa2-a17d-4acffe84a4b5@isocpp.org>
 <1d15dbc4-e0c1-4df1-86db-014e11f14d26@isocpp.org>
 <56114953.4030701@wanadoo.fr> <561B403D.4030403@gmail.com>
 <CAOfiQqkKvZfVatJ1Bz4qSvGc-g6iep0xeP1B1=J1-gCu43NXxg@mail.gmail.com>
 <561C07D1.3080304@gmail.com>
 <8dd3594e-9c16-445e-8d59-fdc48530b8bf@isocpp.org>
Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
	boundary="----=_Part_56_1305846630.1444742722813"
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444742729 18537 80.91.229.3 (13 Oct 2015 13:25:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:25:29 +0000 (UTC)
To: ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals <std-proposals@isocpp.org>
Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBC47RF4IW4GRBQ4M6SYAKGQEWX5SQQI@isocpp.org Tue Oct 13 15:25:27 2015
Return-path: <std-proposals+bncBC47RF4IW4GRBQ4M6SYAKGQEWX5SQQI@isocpp.org>
Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mail-ob0-f198.google.com ([209.85.214.198])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <std-proposals+bncBC47RF4IW4GRBQ4M6SYAKGQEWX5SQQI@isocpp.org>)
	id 1Zlza1-00079G-IC
	for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 15:25:25 +0200
Original-Received: by obbda8 with SMTP id da8sf23671106obb.1
        for <gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org>; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 06:25:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version
         :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe;
        bh=PpteRIVAS7gVDV/T10BLMq/2A77UDnI4PGEUm16ay24=;
        b=RQ0bnosWE4KGXYN+4y09aa5XKkHCZmBiNbKz8SJvVKz6kzq7iXSCkAqYeS5+A3G+Tl
         pQv2QHxHAd6fKmjTxQsalJhf2LjzZZIV64q6Of7+Fq886FtDKPYDpx95n1waBeY5g9Wc
         /95ZjuGaGia6t5oggsrijb+SvZpbvWAzR46+pHbSgWSu848DmV+DHI805WPphTVWqoF9
         Kk4fmqcoE1teVgzPsS8BE6uFEdm32Bsgz3IYb8WAjOFcyFAdK0urRiAvH9BwPohmRhFa
         cMzXaxHNS0gUzL6A/0LY6yV1jUpJVsotXzrEwZk9uU7YTj1HaOwXdb7M4SMHEJ4nk//z
         p0Qw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references
         :subject:mime-version:content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post
         :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe;
        bh=PpteRIVAS7gVDV/T10BLMq/2A77UDnI4PGEUm16ay24=;
        b=iJWYeshtYRB+ygzQJZvBQSMpqHEDxJexYcpexRMVvUNb+4dGD/Mx+a/CnN7E8lHygY
         aC4Ei1l08U4nMxrnrUoYiKXlI9BJL0e0ueI3YyzoIhZfg4Au1UpQ0s2wWABNjSZ1KoEA
         IKeOCL3/TPixCQ0hxEhRc6LDRMtDxPYBCO/mDZaFdgB637gKqDj/2UhTgoZGNYtY/Jnn
         2Lp/TiFTExjTjOwXH2qtHac9rX/tvLABG2JG6zw1urVNdjIRFctlWBIyiHo1zCE4F+2/
         eJRJrtNN4hpjjG9e4CV5Ead5DyzUEELo/0l6imntKvEPCYy8ODkVZoz94XovhKvn5c3P
         tiUA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkhVtFso+srxkK5ESTag6llNnUcnUsobQIBKuIAUSXoHQjUrcRmbzIUN3aPBarIMWMukOTb
X-Received: by 10.182.106.228 with SMTP id gx4mr28457192obb.34.1444742724289;
        Tue, 13 Oct 2015 06:25:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org
Original-Received: by 10.50.117.97 with SMTP id kd1ls1395094igb.19.gmail; Tue, 13 Oct
 2015 06:25:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.50.225.70 with SMTP id ri6mr124313igc.9.1444742723386;
        Tue, 13 Oct 2015 06:25:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8dd3594e-9c16-445e-8d59-fdc48530b8bf@isocpp.org>
X-Original-Sender: GorNishanov@gmail.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org
List-ID: <std-proposals.isocpp.org>
X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: std-proposals@isocpp.org
X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/post>, <mailto:std-proposals@isocpp.org>
List-Help: <http://support.google.com/a/isocpp.org/bin/topic.py?topic=25838>, <mailto:std-proposals+help@isocpp.org>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/>
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/subscribe>,
 <mailto:std-proposals+subscribe@isocpp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+399137483710+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>,
 <http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/subscribe>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:21655
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals/21655>

------=_Part_56_1305846630.1444742722813
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_57_1122194364.1444742722813"

------=_Part_57_1122194364.1444742722813
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On Tuesday, October 13, 2015 at 4:58:01 AM UTC-7, Germ=C3=A1n Diago wrote:
>
> This is my main concern with the proposal: type-erasure and allocations.
> Seems that there are some fancy optimizations possible, but I am not sure
> why we should rely on these when there are other alternatives.
>

At the moment, there is NO alternative that can match zero-overhead of the=
=20
P0057. If you believe there is one, I offered you earlier in this thread a=
=20
way how you can validate whether you belief is true or not.

--=20

---=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposa=
ls/.

------=_Part_57_1122194364.1444742722813
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><br>On Tuesday, October 13, 2015 at 4:58:01 AM UTC-7, =
Germ=C3=A1n Diago wrote:<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: =
0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;"><div d=
ir=3D"ltr"><div>This is my main concern with the proposal: type-erasure and=
 allocations.<br>Seems that there are some fancy optimizations possible, bu=
t I am not sure<br>why we should rely on these when there are other alterna=
tives.<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>At the moment, there=
 is NO=C2=A0alternative that can match zero-overhead of the P0057. If you b=
elieve there is one, I offered you earlier in this thread a way how you can=
 validate whether you belief is true or not.</div><div><br></div></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
<br />
--- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to <a href=3D"mailto:std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org">std-proposa=
ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org</a>.<br />
To post to this group, send email to <a href=3D"mailto:std-proposals@isocpp=
..org">std-proposals@isocpp.org</a>.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/=
std-proposals/">http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<=
/a>.<br />

------=_Part_57_1122194364.1444742722813--
------=_Part_56_1305846630.1444742722813--

.
