220 21505 <7c3441ae-09a0-4d18-aae0-1fb5875ff0e8@isocpp.org> article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gor Nishanov Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Resumable expressions p0114r0 vs async/await P0057R0 Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 08:01:43 -0700 (PDT) Lines: 73 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: <7c3441ae-09a0-4d18-aae0-1fb5875ff0e8@isocpp.org> References: <639f0012-8cb4-4db3-82a6-8d042a3497f9@isocpp.org> <643e2b46-3636-41e9-881b-b1d9cb1d0a7f@isocpp.org> <72ae6d7c-28ad-445a-9e5e-f3e7a6de31e5@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_3840_647753127.1444489303713" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444489311 6879 80.91.229.3 (10 Oct 2015 15:01:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 15:01:51 +0000 (UTC) To: ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBC47RF4IW4GRBWGQ4SYAKGQETBD4G3I@isocpp.org Sat Oct 10 17:01:51 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-vk0-f69.google.com ([209.85.213.69]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zkvec-0006zl-AT for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 17:01:46 +0200 Original-Received: by vkaw128 with SMTP id w128sf36381965vka.2 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 08:01:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=DRTqmdE/liy7AT3UapEWWLe8k3R56VujN9ft32UkegA=; b=v8VDObEIglig5eiN4xa8WUyAykY+QIrTNfWxXXMMhNDPrYtsZWVNwERXQKEd4XIM+x PkZJnWP/5NRAx/gt9OJB1nNZjRR1xrtk0h8Qn3wXp91YLQVRAPo/w05vNUJElmNtDY4n 6OZ7TUKTjDXvauKQ0EE2U6Ixalv4Fh24Oo/ejx+cVh/euS5lFDSIOIyMTuRkjhWGNxmu DJRYvgOH1E54h0uERT/2cXfjPDbdAFy4Jb/9Vs6oLJO1dfjMmIPlwguT1jl2+mkOHO4X tqagdKLISmahQ6yWTsKvysYjj4zpTy2WhKSsMuyl05qLvWhQLviWDCYlMN/mmtRIFInT I66Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=DRTqmdE/liy7AT3UapEWWLe8k3R56VujN9ft32UkegA=; b=lPdarFDYN+OpJPP5Zzko1WD47CZABqz7TcyL6LcrvgP3cDzdM7VJXsHVJB+3U95ow0 2zhdwjedwm/8G2m3c1gGWGZd9IjbuOO66zS+9JeE5v2lWiJRLcELnhAZPw3wRw1G3++e VwyriUjWXqH/gmT7C3W/t7Zzg8bzvTrp49ZS++iT0KBoVPA6+7QKCZzAaum9Cg3gn2HA sKvoqj7viNzC1v2gvsITWPXpNjk7fw6SG6eZxd7oKfYu9PvOYigGlDxbe14TpjIIGg3S eS7sKQ+3M1CPxFaY6UEz/rlVZFwZHL22uJMiN7KyeUNS0dRoXpBWuvbqtvlNhta5+ylX hDEw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkftvVv40TTkkqTgq2Q8vBpCBZrVCng/LmdcOCB0vuR3EEx//RWDUU+FA9MfQqabcyhtyIS X-Received: by 10.129.125.130 with SMTP id y124mr15578247ywc.14.1444489305175; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 08:01:45 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.107.29.7 with SMTP id d7ls1088095iod.13.gmail; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 08:01:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.136.163 with SMTP id qb3mr58577igb.12.1444489304496; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 08:01:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <72ae6d7c-28ad-445a-9e5e-f3e7a6de31e5@isocpp.org> X-Original-Sender: GorNishanov@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: std-proposals@isocpp.org X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:21505 Archived-At: ------=_Part_3840_647753127.1444489303713 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3841_707706196.1444489303714" ------=_Part_3841_707706196.1444489303714 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Correction. I think you meant: (referring to classes in opawait attached in the previous response) operator await(awaiter{ 1ms }); not operator await(1ms); Yes, I think the wording is written to make it possible, however, I just checked, the implementation we ship in VS Update 1 does not do that. I filed a bug against myself. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. ------=_Part_3841_707706196.1444489303714 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Correction. I think you meant: (referring to classes = in opawait attached in the previous response)

<= font face=3D"Consolas" size=3D"2"> operator await(awaiter{ 1ms });<= /font>


not


operator await(1ms);


Yes,= I think the wording is written to make it possible, however, I just checke= d, the implementation we ship in VS Update 1 does not do that.=C2=A0I filed= a bug against myself.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposa= ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
------=_Part_3841_707706196.1444489303714-- ------=_Part_3840_647753127.1444489303713-- .