220 20878 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ville Voutilainen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: Rough Draft Proposal of Interpolated String Literals Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 02:25:40 +0300 Lines: 20 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <043C43B5-72C9-4136-8D2F-2A3D745B2975@gmail.com> <6e2f4cfa-92d7-49e3-ad1a-5b0e0bb803b9@isocpp.org> <93bca85a-d265-4f44-bff5-0f6a009efb70@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443396349 12338 80.91.229.3 (27 Sep 2015 23:25:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 23:25:49 +0000 (UTC) To: "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBC5JHI7A7ALRB5PVUGYAKGQEIH6LYFI@isocpp.org Mon Sep 28 01:25:48 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f70.google.com ([209.85.220.70]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZgLKC-0000Q3-0Q for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 01:25:44 +0200 Original-Received: by pav10 with SMTP id 10sf299857078pav.1 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:25:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=kP9smoroCPtSr0IVwBbcYv5MsUPcTEMFAMiIJ7aVz3U=; b=Gagfly9A4Qs8B2IC+4TkoLabCI8rm0dUaHEpMXMJfF9WDIqAxI5GyAPvIE4vFZFow9 LZrctND2f9tgAY8shZSoQwMTXtHDCjfrNJY8GtOxTo8AZSXd4Xdl4BKHseYzWpUAnQL2 9c0MEXBY0pVJjraKqCTglPQLvoL6g3k3F3CwhFU8ArgKxF7xcseSG8mKMxVJvcmFAiNN akTnTe9dGMkDOcNFSDziF9ej+sk9qqJcqM8fuwFzEem4d592ZXY3L44zwxof86UlQTnj ePRL3c2kK85EHVmywbHb8O6RDh+HIENDnxQ5VIdA7Vpml/l54UW8dxgahrtqoGckF+0N O3lw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnHmm1jqdnSVThu1ccn8lhhGGaVozGNE6obYsNfVMdjYFBK5Usc0GsfB9V9+ANQT1Hi0CCK X-Received: by 10.68.102.99 with SMTP id fn3mr15858119pbb.2.1443396342712; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:25:42 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.140.21.234 with SMTP id 97ls2732238qgl.91.gmail; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:25:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.31.27.214 with SMTP id b205mr10796611vkb.145.1443396341302; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:25:41 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-vk0-x22b.google.com (mail-vk0-x22b.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22b]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d67si7533833vka.141.2015.09.27.16.25.41 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:25:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ville.voutilainen@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22b as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22b; Original-Received: by vkfp126 with SMTP id p126so82033025vkf.3 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:25:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.31.58.142 with SMTP id h136mr9718348vka.58.1443396340857; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:25:40 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.103.37.195 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:25:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: ville.voutilainen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ville.voutilainen@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22b as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ville.voutilainen@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: std-proposals@isocpp.org X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:20878 Archived-At: On 28 September 2015 at 01:44, Andrew Tomazos wrote: > I'm not so sure. I think the locale is set usually globally/statefully, > right? So dates, currency delimiters etc are not set and translated on a > per-string-literal basis - and therefore out-of-scope for per-string-literal > formatting. > Admittedly I don't know a lot about locales. Would need to do some further > research if this proposal was pursued. That seems to assume that std::locales and their associated facets would be used for localization, which is a bold assumption. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. .