220 19867 <736eb378-52a4-43ba-b3b5-a73719ba70af@isocpp.org> article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Arthur Tchaikovsky Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: default arguments Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 11:37:26 -0700 (PDT) Lines: 73 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: <736eb378-52a4-43ba-b3b5-a73719ba70af@isocpp.org> References: Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_489_1032625889.1439836646196" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1439836655 17405 80.91.229.3 (17 Aug 2015 18:37:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 18:37:35 +0000 (UTC) To: ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBDL6FI4NYYERBZ6TZCXAKGQEZSBFMPY@isocpp.org Mon Aug 17 20:37:31 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-qg0-f70.google.com ([209.85.192.70]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZRPHm-0005k6-Hx for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 20:37:30 +0200 Original-Received: by qgj62 with SMTP id 62sf157593808qgj.3 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 11:37:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=YlGJNdRYL4reoZLSJb9jjaJKxmOzuGO2P2MTXHfL3+g=; b=tNXV1Dwa6ozXvfC66U4CIeDbbFS88e1TUkEarOTUz+mnTeLcYpkpJwiW9QpN0h0Rjc UyF5Sb9JfKF+ErS26oNu6iGwtjP+CqPOeQwBXq6GCiKVPJCBgeI9Pt4aP6ot3qSoPLBu Ik46TLyRqdezDbYDE1SMMucEqH88jntDcFW8kkizOqNXAuwMyeM8kqU1SvLUCpk/ZCD2 bpuTid4p6lT2ud77jVBPb3ixUZAEDZiKhSCdOCjZ4yP6wu3S/ZTuLyzwrrGXHWS7PrkI jVzjUQyceVw1c3/GFBfD0Sfv2In7JhL8LhEwApQ4d/LOSjejHISuuUj7gISi74vu2awE KfHg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=YlGJNdRYL4reoZLSJb9jjaJKxmOzuGO2P2MTXHfL3+g=; b=fT7vBtHjyNAiMsZ239ydU1LWfXFGhS4lvUjbH5Qc4uoVbmf66A0syqG763fKoO/HJt 173vRl4RA8olVJOCEqD8A7VX28aPMPW0P8jOsLDPdkq1dKn4R7Q8KvCoYMx6ot7HNGmM NYozOAnDHI+9yGtP53Rm2GuwhNvjyrN62CuKElmjQUp/0Z8eASBPzBcz5d8Il/sanpR5 xu1UgBoykqG3NAZiKIF82bay+SHKk6xh8ypx7wETPV6XvGoFOYAr/pwpXIDG/xtmOXYR wXXi0FBze5MQM02P3hYzPeo0dhz69OgkiGaSvBpM6pWlDIznAay7XYaJUkYq2q+nZHUL ZkLw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn9kEhZY6PLMjMiJu+0uNQ3mGj9mlbAeY8Q92cGLhJRiEEWEaX2WuLTrMmwzyTH5Yx7oizt X-Received: by 10.129.4.7 with SMTP id 7mr2380757ywe.24.1439836649568; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 11:37:29 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.140.30.52 with SMTP id c49ls2620324qgc.81.gmail; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 11:37:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.104.115 with SMTP id z106mr35215qge.23.1439836647244; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 11:37:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: atch.cpp@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: std-proposals@isocpp.org X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:19867 Archived-At: ------=_Part_489_1032625889.1439836646196 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_490_1488867531.1439836646197" ------=_Part_490_1488867531.1439836646197 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I would really appreciate some feedback from people, or is this proposal so uninteresting that there is no point in wasting keyboard on it? On Saturday, 15 August 2015 17:49:50 UTC+1, Arthur Tchaikovsky wrote: > > Hi, > Does anyone see helpfulness of such solution: > Having fnc: > > void f(int a = 0, int b = 1, int c = 2, int d = 3); > > I think that it would be nice to be able to say whilst calling it and > requiring only some of those args to be non-default: > > f(default,2,default,4); > > Thoughts? > > > > > > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. ------=_Part_490_1488867531.1439836646197 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I would really appreciate some feedback from people, or is= this proposal so uninteresting that there is no point in wasting keyboard = on it?

On Saturday, 15 August 2015 17:49:50 UTC+1, Arthur Tchaikovsk= y wrote:
Hi, =
Does anyone see helpfulness of such solution:
Having fnc:

voi= d f(int a =3D 0, int b =3D 1, int c =3D 2, int d =3D 3);

I think tha= t it would be nice to be able to say whilst calling it and requiring only s= ome of those args to be non-default:

f(default,2,default,4);

= Thoughts?





--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposa= ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
------=_Part_490_1488867531.1439836646197-- ------=_Part_489_1032625889.1439836646196-- .