220 19628 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ville Voutilainen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: try_realloc Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 16:38:21 +0300 Lines: 17 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <30f59ec7-0712-48fb-9df0-d66e3fe80c3c@isocpp.org> <2839762.j35TZXxY8Y@tjmaciei-mobl4> <20150802102813.GA6177@noemi.bahnhof.se> <7C86EFA3-F6B3-44B4-9B36-C2B583EBE43F@gmail.com> <30320680-2e10-46a2-9438-ca9abcfdeb2e@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1438695512 1796 80.91.229.3 (4 Aug 2015 13:38:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 13:38:32 +0000 (UTC) To: "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBC5JHI7A7ALRBTUAQOXAKGQEGW7GPQI@isocpp.org Tue Aug 04 15:38:24 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-vn0-f72.google.com ([209.85.216.72]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMcQB-0003rn-KO for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:38:23 +0200 Original-Received: by vnav141 with SMTP id v141sf9519249vna.1 for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 06:38:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=tQOv0c92mjJ82fFM0z/M7lidWSa60O8mZlG+2AJ7MHA=; b=dECDW09Z6i6LmFwlHiIso3EQoC3hTF96Fakvtj6/mVGtXwH0gabU4+Sf72zS1vxQ8h /0C2MgSYeFtk4NJ/J2l5B4b3dhj0CttzLIYHyNT3VRzA5R8AlCaqGRdBtjtlxWXFCIJ7 LmVE+t+HNB0oq46yEBrDu3Nd7gJoIaRA1cKeeYWE2RSXgW1ft1bx2Z8U1oXOnv7sGOA6 u7dY4zPYPLd1pg5uRGJGuqsOdsEBcSHeoVq8JxNkiJgS4limPlguDPn073lIsSBKRCEP AkOJYNfdem8wCX3EW6OS0fUAoNPw9lrQPyvkNS9bC4eg3MARJ9tM1EqqMjx4irHRd0mr x/OA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnBaxA8rF1Nw4Dy7mlupxRyNS+vGFqInUdZb6U7qxbozMDPavKOCBDA6MLkZDU4oOsTRxEC X-Received: by 10.13.227.70 with SMTP id m67mr3178284ywe.41.1438695502772; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 06:38:22 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.50.78.195 with SMTP id d3ls201218igx.13.gmail; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 06:38:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.107.128.28 with SMTP id b28mr3622650iod.84.1438695501746; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 06:38:21 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-ig0-x233.google.com (mail-ig0-x233.google.com. [2607:f8b0:4001:c05::233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id jj8si346407igb.103.2015.08.04.06.38.21 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Aug 2015 06:38:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ville.voutilainen@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c05::233 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c05::233; Original-Received: by iggf3 with SMTP id f3so11210737igg.1 for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 06:38:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.43.134 with SMTP id w6mr27313323igl.74.1438695501478; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 06:38:21 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.36.53.9 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 06:38:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <30320680-2e10-46a2-9438-ca9abcfdeb2e@isocpp.org> X-Original-Sender: ville.voutilainen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ville.voutilainen@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c05::233 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ville.voutilainen@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: std-proposals@isocpp.org X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:19628 Archived-At: On 4 August 2015 at 16:10, Giovanni Piero Deretta wrote: >> > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1085.htm > Even without WG14 buy-in, it might be worthwhile adding it to C++ under the > std namespace. The nice thing about the try_realloc interface is that it is Agreed, WG14 is sometimes so extension-averse that it's fairly difficult to move things forward if it's considered a must to have their buy-in. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. .