220 19506 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bo Persson Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Omitting multiple access specifiers in base-specifier Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 22:40:17 +0200 Lines: 69 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <6e813678-3540-4717-9c9c-7f4b5ed2cd82@isocpp.org> <94722b66-2ed6-44b9-b57d-80572d417c60@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1438375243 4516 80.91.229.3 (31 Jul 2015 20:40:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 20:40:43 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCZ6RLW3UIKBBP5256WQKGQEVFL3IDA@isocpp.org Fri Jul 31 22:40:35 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-lb0-f200.google.com ([209.85.217.200]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZLH6Y-0000l8-12 for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 22:40:34 +0200 Original-Received: by lbcjf8 with SMTP id jf8sf27450129lbc.0 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 13:40:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:date:lines:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:user-agent:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=aU2uhRUang0Dr6/fQsYhOrIw2YvV/7Nzrmn9soY2GxE=; b=hPK88f3KlXWK9r31Pcqcq5KlTBBHvZXFbfKLhSxw9ID8HLn98zUGbtHXTgMBsyWRmR MQ8zsJECFCiidCXLTsiTbmctHPc3OeQ4O+78Kyyf0Kpje2ttifsaHHFueIN4u6pLuZNI t+rhmU/p6y/WqfxBqsWyfKrTaiAixq6nuxcvy1muiuloaDzfNcxnFOnhb3I3MR96VQ7B K7ZtJ4WlfYj/kjfVIAeOEfn0zThuN850roPCWddDN2ZpPgwyP90EunFa3a8M/P7imN4f Ca9NxISBA6h1F3VhTkLL7aecBqPY2haB+ObuZJ6nd08B62LezCgWhvgaGuuI0WmCe+p6 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmIBX/qIXNpLMlgtHe8ErW55zfQ7f0sqbyRryZdgiA0dXLuUpYmH8ywQyyt7Zopdn4Pfkfk X-Received: by 10.112.98.42 with SMTP id ef10mr1501653lbb.18.1438375233334; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 13:40:33 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.152.9.70 with SMTP id x6ls381400laa.5.gmail; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 13:40:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.152.116.39 with SMTP id jt7mr5121494lab.82.1438375231174; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 13:40:31 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org. [80.91.229.3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s10si4886125laj.84.2015.07.31.13.40.30 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 31 Jul 2015 13:40:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) client-ip=80.91.229.3; Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZLH6T-0000cE-KI for std-proposals@isocpp.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 22:40:29 +0200 Original-Received: from c-358fe655.021-326-6d6c6d10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se ([85.230.143.53]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 22:40:24 +0200 Original-Received: from bop by c-358fe655.021-326-6d6c6d10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 22:40:24 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 60 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-358fe655.021-326-6d6c6d10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 In-Reply-To: <94722b66-2ed6-44b9-b57d-80572d417c60@isocpp.org> X-Original-Sender: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: std-proposals@isocpp.org X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:19506 Archived-At: On 2015-07-31 21:30, Arthur Tchaikovsky wrote: > You completely missed my point. > In order to prove it to you, I ask you to do this same with protected > access. And I have never, ever declared a class with 3 or more protected base classes, so I don't need simplified syntax for doing that. Do you? Bo Persson > > On Friday, 31 July 2015 17:48:42 UTC+1, Bo Persson wrote: > > On 2015-07-31 17:23, Arthur Tchaikovsky wrote: > > Hi Tony, > > As much I respect your opinion, you cannot say that my proposed > syntax > > is _sort of_ uniform. It is uniform. It is orthogonal *one - to - > one* > > with internals of a class and how theirs access are specified. > Example: > > > > class X > > { > > public: > > int a, b, c; > > }; > > > > class X : public: A,B,C; > > { > > }; > > > struct X : A,B,C > { > }; > > already does this, and even shorter. > > How many variants do we really need? > > > > > The point here is that: > > a) there is a colon after access modifier, all separate base classes > > have *the same* access modifier and are separated by comma and the > > statement of declaring inheritance access modifier is ended with > > semicolon. This is *exactly* one to one mapping. Not, _sort of_, not > > *false* as Ville was implying, but *exact*, one to one mapping. > > > > Can't even remember when was the last time I had 3 or more base > classes. > Are we solving a real problem here? > > > Bo Persson > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. .