220 19491 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bo Persson Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Omitting multiple access specifiers in base-specifier Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 18:48:21 +0200 Lines: 52 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <6e813678-3540-4717-9c9c-7f4b5ed2cd82@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1438361331 27122 80.91.229.3 (31 Jul 2015 16:48:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:48:51 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCZ6RLW3UIKBB2GN52WQKGQEHYQ6Q3A@isocpp.org Fri Jul 31 18:48:43 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-wi0-f199.google.com ([209.85.212.199]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZLDUA-0000LG-BY for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 18:48:42 +0200 Original-Received: by wicmm11 with SMTP id mm11sf10137577wic.3 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 09:48:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:date:lines:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:user-agent:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=8kpFxjirNh/PB7msNsWCeVRRAOkQKfGdSE8c8oaEvn8=; b=eYzW+3tHkAY7nlgkC5A3Xep5yN9Ihtr2wI/jLi5FVEJq7d8xHYtZA8VhZJiEKjXkV4 6YFpHjgcLZEW0MqATGUGfW5syrDbvS95kSpCqEI2r79/RNWEgyK+IbUVSWDAMXxbk/Dd g1iX6OhNzMFHlwk67/hSnX+DCyutqYBflVBmKoZYtNc7aUu54szOkC6pGKESpeyogpjD QiW4ItFhYYFAuhPEBBsUTea1gUb6PDV9D0F+uFdn/4DyoCyPOkNM59h6o0lc67mF45pe 3y+9nETmgf7refTmV0AxVmLnAIt67xiBxyBPTbOocWfF+yMvgCh0A3M38oDOiS2VC4tT X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnbj2aCDFMI4DTy7bgDTEpdlOH5FaveF2pXnSkmfTR7xAc5hkG4XnhGJAvuxaPwFhIUPFsQ X-Received: by 10.112.173.230 with SMTP id bn6mr1217922lbc.15.1438361321577; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 09:48:41 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.152.27.101 with SMTP id s5ls346447lag.108.gmail; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 09:48:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.152.7.65 with SMTP id h1mr4002231laa.33.1438361320085; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 09:48:40 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org. [80.91.229.3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dl8si4256527lad.72.2015.07.31.09.48.39 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 31 Jul 2015 09:48:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) client-ip=80.91.229.3; Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZLDU6-0000JB-N5 for std-proposals@isocpp.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 18:48:38 +0200 Original-Received: from c-358fe655.021-326-6d6c6d10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se ([85.230.143.53]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 18:48:38 +0200 Original-Received: from bop by c-358fe655.021-326-6d6c6d10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 18:48:38 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 43 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-358fe655.021-326-6d6c6d10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: std-proposals@isocpp.org X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:19491 Archived-At: On 2015-07-31 17:23, Arthur Tchaikovsky wrote: > Hi Tony, > As much I respect your opinion, you cannot say that my proposed syntax > is _sort of_ uniform. It is uniform. It is orthogonal *one - to - one* > with internals of a class and how theirs access are specified. Example: > > class X > { > public: > int a, b, c; > }; > > class X : public: A,B,C; > { > }; struct X : A,B,C { }; already does this, and even shorter. How many variants do we really need? > > The point here is that: > a) there is a colon after access modifier, all separate base classes > have *the same* access modifier and are separated by comma and the > statement of declaring inheritance access modifier is ended with > semicolon. This is *exactly* one to one mapping. Not, _sort of_, not > *false* as Ville was implying, but *exact*, one to one mapping. > Can't even remember when was the last time I had 3 or more base classes. Are we solving a real problem here? Bo Persson -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. .