220 19164 <mooimp$ekc$1@ger.gmane.org> article
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Matthew Woehlke <mwoehlke.floss@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals
Subject: Re: Point class
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:08:41 -0400
Lines: 30
Approved: news@gmane.org
Message-ID: <mooimp$ekc$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <beb0ccd3-3537-4c3a-a8a9-98aa2fe2a029@isocpp.org>	<mooeku$du2$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAE+wLFBX2NByqyJ36jmCciy876+aV-jzcqDxMxJXrh9_TR4wEg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1437584940 20164 80.91.229.3 (22 Jul 2015 17:09:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:09:00 +0000 (UTC)
To: std-proposals@isocpp.org
Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBC37LBFWUIFBBIU4X6WQKGQE4C6NDQA@isocpp.org Wed Jul 22 19:08:51 2015
Return-path: <std-proposals+bncBC37LBFWUIFBBIU4X6WQKGQE4C6NDQA@isocpp.org>
Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mail-lb0-f199.google.com ([209.85.217.199])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <std-proposals+bncBC37LBFWUIFBBIU4X6WQKGQE4C6NDQA@isocpp.org>)
	id 1ZHxVj-0003t7-L2
	for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 19:08:51 +0200
Original-Received: by lbcjf8 with SMTP id jf8sf59218953lbc.0
        for <gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:date:lines:message-id:references
         :mime-version:content-type:user-agent:in-reply-to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe;
        bh=zFx1rmiYVqw+xDEK5Rf8mwRpStoBU9lEn5PJwuRwmls=;
        b=FoxlCWf6zomB2s8WgTChIx7DuqNefu1kFDVu/8UIq5OyEq9k4CrzT3e4ucpO7jlXz2
         2xqyKCWUChz3oqzekdpSzDT125zl2lVczmeRkXtinYe3k5j/KgWB5FBdG4RAdEeffMQS
         +a5ETGRKPzNf9JmB4nMd+q4h2DEdvdOcHR/W7CswWYY+q+7L6O4M7TglBnxjyPwjozvQ
         ArxBF1rfcRTb8U/cwo7iEZZvRRZyDwdS/cfkRd7tIZthBPMRZmLKC+QtCuhf8GAH1mBB
         hrr826YXrovR/GqvXL9sLa5rZd6CaqLrkBD+REwM+sBETmAQ9M5LAflZEbyRWSTCXp70
         
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnKpXZirBjkrGFJ2WMncKSKC9HcgwyOkTj03lbR4mp8OgunwFt1YZxzy3EC7BCnIpl8Eu/n
X-Received: by 10.112.138.2 with SMTP id qm2mr1620841lbb.19.1437584931221;
        Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org
Original-Received: by 10.152.28.100 with SMTP id a4ls125589lah.52.gmail; Wed, 22 Jul
 2015 10:08:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.152.28.105 with SMTP id a9mr3391192lah.9.1437584929730;
        Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:08:49 -0700 (PDT)
Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org. [80.91.229.3])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dc7si1709404lad.31.2015.07.22.10.08.49
        for <std-proposals@isocpp.org>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:08:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) client-ip=80.91.229.3;
Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1ZHxVg-0003rP-Ae
	for std-proposals@isocpp.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 19:08:48 +0200
Original-Received: from tripoint.kitware.com ([66.194.253.20])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <std-proposals@isocpp.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 19:08:48 +0200
Original-Received: from mwoehlke.floss by tripoint.kitware.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <std-proposals@isocpp.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 19:08:48 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
Original-Lines: 21
Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: tripoint.kitware.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
In-Reply-To: <CAE+wLFBX2NByqyJ36jmCciy876+aV-jzcqDxMxJXrh9_TR4wEg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-Sender: mwoehlke.floss@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;       spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as
 permitted sender) smtp.mail=gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org;
       dmarc=fail (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org
List-ID: <std-proposals.isocpp.org>
X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: std-proposals@isocpp.org
X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/post>, <mailto:std-proposals@isocpp.org>
List-Help: <http://support.google.com/a/isocpp.org/bin/topic.py?topic=25838>, <mailto:std-proposals+help@isocpp.org>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/>
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/subscribe>,
 <mailto:std-proposals+subscribe@isocpp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+399137483710+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>,
 <http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/subscribe>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:19164
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals/19164>

On 2015-07-22 12:53, David Haim wrote:
> about the Eigen class:
> well, this is a philosophical question. isn't C++11 borrows heavily from
> boost type_traits and thread library? didn't we already have some platforms
> and libraries with Thread class in them?  there are many I can think of.
> MFC is one of them (for windows).
> isn't C++17 is going to borrow heavily from boost networking library and
> filesystem library?
> does the fact that something already exists outside the standard is enough
> to cancel it's standardization? I think the opposite. the fact there there
> are many platforms and libraries outside that implement Point class only
> proves its necessity.

I don't disagree; I'm just concerned with finding the right balance of
features that will make a point class sufficiently useful to make real
inroads at replacing existing libraries.

You can also take that another way... should Eigen be standardized?

-- 
Matthew

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/.

.
