220 18953 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: b17c0de@gmail.com Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: N3599 for C++17 Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2015 01:37:56 -0700 (PDT) Lines: 61 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_770_1012005775.1436085476651" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1436085485 10477 80.91.229.3 (5 Jul 2015 08:38:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2015 08:38:05 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBDXOF65U5IPBBZOZ4OWAKGQEGS6EHWQ@isocpp.org Sun Jul 05 10:38:02 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-qk0-f198.google.com ([209.85.220.198]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZBfR2-0002gI-4d for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Jul 2015 10:38:00 +0200 Original-Received: by qkca12 with SMTP id a12sf240376464qkc.1 for ; Sun, 05 Jul 2015 01:37:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version:content-type :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=f+l9QlsIrcPrX9D2jk/6CvUU9qWYzqERDPonQUj82sI=; b=v9sjjNQLhyOvrMeFXlpQfqsCe+XTxDNw/OaPlgzIptqyjpBHFBptrIfnZu6m591j1R 1zTXVkje5mzyfE1Jd57CTWOp20JOCd8TZREiqeH2hM+aiXE8k2BuDIgXB98/ocuou/6n ZrTIUTgK88L0eFVSxebsjOEJ5q9U+sqQ9bSad3wzZaE9s/wPQTC99Qp8kdc/ZEfN3A1E TNrcGvkvHvwFym7CgWoU1uaH1iqeeBZtmdHzlIeKuhj4R+tz0NxycxiGYHL3VExQuM5R HNfuoviRSThqNVbQn8BMy4ANufMOCpe3MlqRgdbUkKvj1gW3MGNq5L0ilJtOIS5IbIO/ LiKg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=f+l9QlsIrcPrX9D2jk/6CvUU9qWYzqERDPonQUj82sI=; b=YC1QEVIX93GccHb3xo9opeAu2N4eLrzGCJ8ZJgXk3QfUQwNy0Q6dY2tdD7UnnOlgqm 2LHAx1dXSBOvEaEacTU3o8KsKcNMC2gIcXLEdsk4CwJYLDI1e3Gfwb0eoHgsQ7KXUQV4 MVbVRXWxK37Fl1RH+j0NV+WBUkNOOPcez2rJcVerAsTW8MV2gd456MxZ8tQArYUlFBwi sje5dkxTcXojPNjRJT7WnSNL2o3B8Db14LTmfBN45spTsLrVB8LlJy0XMScpq5Tp+esv YHyuZZSlokrHbFjRr1/Zjd+Lt8U5L3c890DR3SoWGLp62e6B66IENL1418fFDURJFuuU +UbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlCs+1EFe2S8qFsPxiqVTQSkaR5Rbv0QAzEC99OCdI1dVRcb2uM7iy03NFQSXJmBwzaCt+/ X-Received: by 10.129.107.70 with SMTP id g67mr44813668ywc.29.1436085478850; Sun, 05 Jul 2015 01:37:58 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.140.17.68 with SMTP id 62ls2456934qgc.13.gmail; Sun, 05 Jul 2015 01:37:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.18.194 with SMTP id 60mr563476qgf.12.1436085477256; Sun, 05 Jul 2015 01:37:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Sender: B17C0DE@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: std-proposals@isocpp.org X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:18953 Archived-At: ------=_Part_770_1012005775.1436085476651 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_771_710576185.1436085476651" ------=_Part_771_710576185.1436085476651 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, What ever happened to N3599? As I understand it, it was proposed for inclusion in C++14. Does anyone know why it didn't get included? Templated string literal operators was actually the first literal operator I tried to implement when C++11 came out. I was disappointed that it didn't work. It seems like an oversight in the standard. I just discovered N3599 today after looking at the code for Super Template Tetris lol. N3599 has already been implemented for clang and gcc. Is there any momentum behind this proposal for C++17? -Kal -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. ------=_Part_771_710576185.1436085476651 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
What ever happened to N3599? As I understand it, i= t was proposed for inclusion in C++14. Does anyone know why it didn't get i= ncluded?

Templated string literal operators was ac= tually the first literal operator I tried to implement when C++11 came out.= I was disappointed that it didn't work. It seems like an oversight in the = standard. I just discovered N3599 today after looking at the code for Super= Template Tetris lol. N3599 has already been implemented for clang and gcc.= Is there any momentum behind this proposal for C++17?

=
-Kal

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposa= ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
------=_Part_771_710576185.1436085476651-- ------=_Part_770_1012005775.1436085476651-- .