220 18657 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Olaf van der Spek Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: Parsing Numbers Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 09:27:24 +0200 Lines: 29 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <8c6a8503-3958-4244-9d0f-33b567250056@isocpp.org> <20150612225334.GA31968@noemi.bahnhof.se> <557C3B5D.4070307@gmail.com> <557EE838.8030605@gmail.com> <557F93A8.3060708@gmail.com> <558184CA.7000708@gmail.com> <5581F980.1000000@gmail.com> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1434612455 28155 80.91.229.3 (18 Jun 2015 07:27:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 07:27:35 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBC5NB45SSABBBXPFRGWAKGQE2BP4SRY@isocpp.org Thu Jun 18 09:27:31 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-wi0-f197.google.com ([209.85.212.197]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5UER-0006Aa-J6 for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 09:27:27 +0200 Original-Received: by wimx15 with SMTP id x15sf1340418wim.1 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:27:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=zD9/Vz8wMgln2vWavV17HmxLJiF7Oc0f7XA3uhShZFI=; b=LHlQp/TLycCB1u2NRRAc0JBWwEpnxVzV154OYBXkoQ4ZyR3BRaxHfNJsOt4mirh/RO RAG0zb9doTrLkEcEPw/Oy1R7+uOu615DBtgQwCCc/dyvf62BPSBSFAS22TGnYzH3v5Fv 6ikJNcO0EjGQsEN16HJDDuvpTBTRY5tFFSriXawkTPLgwqr9st5PnnigtNfK2JQQSzjc 1ekHkXLlXcu+ZDFMqJc64HSpY/6Vlh090IeaP0DY/fRvrj1xVff33/HO0hBgn7LDgxpw Qq77mHZ9suf1ruIDHg5VHteHI0hldfC4BWfsuR38b2uSfjKES2F0U7DTGiVRjSSxVgWu GTSg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkczbAUG3KZZtcorVKU2Ip6d7urrLLT7GSSv2Jp2UCImTi5ysS7U38p6bQRQaOiHV3Q3rqc X-Received: by 10.112.14.101 with SMTP id o5mr9002779lbc.3.1434612445674; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:27:25 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.180.91.77 with SMTP id cc13ls997604wib.36.canary; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:27:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.176.165 with SMTP id cj5mr13333057wjc.72.1434612444672; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:27:24 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com (mail-wi0-x229.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c05::229]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ga6si13766455wib.68.2015.06.18.00.27.24 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:27:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of olafvdspek@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::229 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::229; Original-Received: by wicnd19 with SMTP id nd19so51160938wic.1 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:27:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.5.4 with SMTP id o4mr3125822wjo.51.1434612444346; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:27:24 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.28.102.84 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:27:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5581F980.1000000@gmail.com> X-Original-Sender: olafvdspek@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of olafvdspek@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::229 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=olafvdspek@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: std-proposals@isocpp.org X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:18657 Archived-At: 2015-06-18 0:49 GMT+02:00 Miro Knejp : >> Was there a proposal to accept 0b for strtol? >> When base = 8, the leading 0 in 0777 doesn't have to be a prefix per se. > > If an explicit base is specified any prefix parsing should be disabled. Sounds good but would be incompatible with strtol. >> Returning out-of-range for -1 when parsing an unsigned type seems like >> a no-brainer. > > I'd argue that in that case the parsing of unsigned types should fail on the > minus sign the same way it would for any other invalid character without > consuming any input. Does it matter where it fails? -- Olaf -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. .