220 18295 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Olaf van der Spek Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Parsing Numbers Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 17:42:48 +0200 Lines: 27 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <555CDDEF.8000002@gmx.net> <555ECB8E.9010606@gmx.net> <55680FE0.9050608@gmx.net> <5568237D.7010802@gmx.net> <5568481E.3060709@gmx.net> <55687BF6.7080609@gmx.net> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432914173 26854 80.91.229.3 (29 May 2015 15:42:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 15:42:53 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBC5NB45SSABBB6MRUKVQKGQEUVASACA@isocpp.org Fri May 29 17:42:52 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-lb0-f198.google.com ([209.85.217.198]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YyMQu-0001W9-3x for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 17:42:52 +0200 Original-Received: by lbbqq2 with SMTP id qq2sf20047993lbb.0 for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 08:42:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=QVB9IDE0BabTkTP7w1vyQmoc5ap6NUK/Ftq2VIE+7VE=; b=ZyWHe25+tknr+FgU8mR2qCRXcNK5nWLyKYtwyFidf/GJThaMNzInH4llrro91y/YIB m5kQACdliTeHtb16dvwt9rlrt51VbyyoYVT5kFOFKpQ1/U/IjT6ablcMj86Alap4xS2l /PUgMYGf++M+f90i7KVWetGTQb0vky0SdpIQHCciF03QLVJ6QzzlMz4eVOUJwfWYX+1c Ssj0ZCyFTGK/H5ecCYA808hMqP9oEG3zdLnGY2G/fTK/5xadbIJDb0GqTZ3362MNrucK z1mXaB+01vx8W32OGhuERw4pwBurV/ZmDDtda6+VaAPgwKNChj7w8+9+94qoUEDDkiqu 9XtA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmb0zbrcitWpT6Y0MS9Ej/Cs0qG+DR9g7/2kp3c1DmQjTKbHLUfmCkCJ4N4vHSSukv0wFta X-Received: by 10.152.19.161 with SMTP id g1mr1714419lae.8.1432914171715; Fri, 29 May 2015 08:42:51 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.180.83.200 with SMTP id s8ls182706wiy.11.canary; Fri, 29 May 2015 08:42:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.5.103 with SMTP id r7mr15915691wjr.47.1432914169272; Fri, 29 May 2015 08:42:49 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-wg0-x22b.google.com (mail-wg0-x22b.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ex7si4166337wib.85.2015.05.29.08.42.49 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 29 May 2015 08:42:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of olafvdspek@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b; Original-Received: by wgv5 with SMTP id 5so66139272wgv.1 for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 08:42:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.109.111 with SMTP id hr15mr5642272wib.53.1432914169176; Fri, 29 May 2015 08:42:49 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.28.48.18 with HTTP; Fri, 29 May 2015 08:42:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55687BF6.7080609@gmx.net> X-Original-Sender: olafvdspek@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of olafvdspek@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b as permitted sender) smtp.mail=olafvdspek@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:18295 Archived-At: 2015-05-29 16:47 GMT+02:00 Jens Maurer : > On 05/29/2015 01:11 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > For integer, it has its own > inline char* u32toa(uint32_t value, char* buffer); > and > inline char* u64toa(uint64_t value, char* buffer); > > These are general-purpose functions, yet the author has seen fit > to duplicate the implementation (and not use strtod or similar)? > That can't be right. That's output, not input.. I do agree we need better output functions too but again that's not in scope for this proposal. -- Olaf -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. .