220 18159 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ville Voutilainen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: template blocks Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 12:45:50 +0300 Lines: 34 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432374359 27191 80.91.229.3 (23 May 2015 09:45:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 09:45:59 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBC5JHI7A7ALRBT4YQGVQKGQE32LXDVQ@isocpp.org Sat May 23 11:45:56 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f69.google.com ([209.85.220.69]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw609-0006lp-FJ for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 11:45:53 +0200 Original-Received: by pavx7 with SMTP id x7sf82496587pav.1 for ; Sat, 23 May 2015 02:45:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=/gz0xaLg+AlGVNeAUdn3l5oRypbT5wbfiL0J0PvtuZ0=; b=NGev7jAEGqOA46LpA4U3Ksd3Qfe83Z/enN+Lt73SI7oz83uWYL65E837dfEzrOz3wB 5VKU6FSkgn8Crd4mI8wlNRQPANFePlIiQmXYQ6Gw21pxZcaxwHcKmDitbjpXgs9vNuM/ kPlw2Ig6YvB4tVsrbH652cO499PyQOssb1fUtYVN932036dC8ND54CPyRsZ9PdIkTKII laQ2l5EVITGtEF+BZsOZVN1GrGWqzlE04nfbdIZRm/c5ipqT2c7KexGko2S/gL3mka9q mW1KJjjIx5vFrsi+nPhAJjB8otaCCwkVNH0FO+JtoeBEjayUtvYKdckBBifQ6xLFvMDb /3uQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnht4rdTAXlyTUHSRFBIbeS7qHgUKUFU53wTaczVJtqrib88W/HV0cCqMCR54YUsyF47DtC X-Received: by 10.66.100.163 with SMTP id ez3mr15203241pab.38.1432374351902; Sat, 23 May 2015 02:45:51 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.107.133.164 with SMTP id p36ls577124ioi.30.gmail; Sat, 23 May 2015 02:45:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.43.148.72 with SMTP id kf8mr14293179icc.76.1432374351146; Sat, 23 May 2015 02:45:51 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-ie0-x229.google.com (mail-ie0-x229.google.com. [2607:f8b0:4001:c03::229]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l199si4144102ioe.27.2015.05.23.02.45.51 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 23 May 2015 02:45:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ville.voutilainen@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c03::229 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c03::229; Original-Received: by iepj10 with SMTP id j10so46375079iep.3 for ; Sat, 23 May 2015 02:45:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.107.166.203 with SMTP id p194mr16139190ioe.30.1432374350831; Sat, 23 May 2015 02:45:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.36.213.70 with HTTP; Sat, 23 May 2015 02:45:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: ville.voutilainen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ville.voutilainen@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c03::229 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ville.voutilainen@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:18159 Archived-At: On 23 May 2015 at 12:35, Douglas Boffey wrote: >>> I was under the impression that writing the definitions of member >>> functions within a class definition was a pretty strong hint that the >>> compiler should inline the functions in code. >> That's a red herring, this thing is a class template so the member funct= ion >> bodies need to be visible to users anyway, so they are eligible for such >> inlining regardless of whether they are in the class definition or outsi= de >> it. > No one is arguing that class templates can not be visible. I am > claiming there is a semantic difference, equivalent to using the > =E2=80=98inline=E2=80=99 specifier for a function. Admittedly, the compi= ler can > ignore such hints. What _semantic_ difference? There isn't any. > Therefore, with respect, it is not the red herring you claim. It most certainly is. --=20 ---=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposa= ls/. .