220 17995 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "'Matt Calabrese' via ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: First draft: Non-copyable call wrapper, std::unique_function Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 10:52:14 -0700 Lines: 55 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <59ED9069-2650-44E2-B00E-0E56ED37B83D@gmail.com> <27a788e7-4912-4a58-8201-79138ddf15a3@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303f64d082368b051672f815 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432057939 32348 80.91.229.3 (19 May 2015 17:52:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 17:52:19 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCGNLO5F34OBBT7Q5WVAKGQE4N56QWA@isocpp.org Tue May 19 19:52:19 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-yh0-f72.google.com ([209.85.213.72]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yulge-00071O-MJ for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 May 2015 19:52:16 +0200 Original-Received: by yhik52 with SMTP id k52sf18315380yhi.1 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 10:52:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=XU+e5pcg0GF/QtLFY9lD9vh/geESPw7rm3Dmx2JMEyQ=; b=lriPbmx3UW4CurYiiTqCoHIci+xDNYf4djxjmZ9jxx73VcblZsOSfbtFoDMoD72Srv TpbhfldKIJOWJU6qOSbDqjat8ms9R66oTyOLL4lFtsv1PF3P0X+0nUTc5DLwfxzl0IXj stWt84CR1K/SiZ1d9VDkQHypWDriNm3YtDnL51zoPM30XBt0WJ0hUlFC4+TYTxebV38c KaXSecbM39p96MafJGm/FVszunD4CeBs0g5uJPunIQvGc+rTF9BDH0F9I7BKTSi7XN6J OGu+MJ4J02MG/yuJ0ta7tniEGrp/MXvgUFzwMwHPDB9OOSwxRazr4xkc2vdoXJ5zScP8 l7Ng== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn53fXII5MrmyqoLhe8hU8uQ+zj5Xsq6Miq7kFyzwUTs+cBrajX0JFYddLdQ9Avd3PQ7+GM X-Received: by 10.140.149.84 with SMTP id 81mr41969869qhv.4.1432057935946; Tue, 19 May 2015 10:52:15 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.50.41.66 with SMTP id d2ls971116igl.31.canary; Tue, 19 May 2015 10:52:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.43.104.69 with SMTP id dl5mr19245187icc.94.1432057935087; Tue, 19 May 2015 10:52:15 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-ig0-x22e.google.com (mail-ig0-x22e.google.com. [2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22e]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l5si2755097igv.47.2015.05.19.10.52.15 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 19 May 2015 10:52:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of calabrese@google.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22e as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22e; Original-Received: by igcau1 with SMTP id au1so20306606igc.1 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 10:52:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.42.206.9 with SMTP id fs9mr41210170icb.19.1432057934907; Tue, 19 May 2015 10:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.107.157.129 with HTTP; Tue, 19 May 2015 10:52:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: calabrese@google.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of calabrese@google.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22e as permitted sender) smtp.mail=calabrese@google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Original-From: Matt Calabrese Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:17995 Archived-At: --20cf303f64d082368b051672f815 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Nevin Liber wrote: > Also, consider making unique_function(unique_function&&) noexcept. > +1 for noexcept, and it should be able to avoid calling the move constructor when in remote storage (forcing remote storage if the underlying object has a move constructor that can throw) -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. --20cf303f64d082368b051672f815 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On T= ue, May 19, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Nevin Liber <nevin@eviloverlord.com= > wrote:
Also, consider making= unique_function(unique_function&&) noexcept.

+1 for noexcept, and it should be able t= o avoid calling the move constructor when in remote storage (forcing remote= storage if the underlying object has a move constructor that can throw)

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposa= ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
--20cf303f64d082368b051672f815-- .