220 17719 <966e96a5-294a-4992-9eb1-7fd683ef5633@isocpp.org> article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Morwenn Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?=5Bstd=2Dproposals=5D_Re=3A_Proposal=3A_Class_static_=E2=80=9Cproper?= =?UTF-8?Q?ty=E2=80=9D_constants_in_vtables?= Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 02:41:39 -0700 (PDT) Lines: 90 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: <966e96a5-294a-4992-9eb1-7fd683ef5633@isocpp.org> References: <49c358a2-d19a-415f-a4fa-1ff67286a0ad@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_181_1167576531.1430905299966" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1430905303 16303 80.91.229.3 (6 May 2015 09:41:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 09:41:43 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBC2ZP4V74IFBBVGDU6VAKGQE2CNVQ7Q@isocpp.org Wed May 06 11:41:43 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-pd0-f197.google.com ([209.85.192.197]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ypvpm-0002mj-Mt for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 May 2015 11:41:42 +0200 Original-Received: by pdbqd1 with SMTP id qd1sf6798477pdb.1 for ; Wed, 06 May 2015 02:41:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=Z45OgBTx/BnNwfwqgGbO4x/DTTzve2FrtgfHIodcyDM=; b=AxopzYtyM8MmHOmJNcJ+5Z7QLlnDK2H0dGje8M/k1zeK8c9PSn/5XpAU2X3+zJmSNU NxFAShQmpCVCi/CDzkWPmUSZJyOzmfJpAJWkT9EglcsqcKbVJhsACbqcV/dLeISgYdJy CVYS1RnyyNt/F3zfVNx7BH9hvaAlQrV9Xd9T4VHHzvUU40pM2Gv+3dgDJrXkkcMGOBzB fLDxnPwV6k9zuFu7VwwFZLvtqrc25Y7QH6M3cOVfE7ZpeYeGoZOGkwZJsqvJBSvA3Qoy icaEIjpH5U5Kxz57dezmRiGRkrD6zdqutnQ5D7Vjd4juiQhDwDSS8xp4YEiB12aFZ1aj EYbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=Z45OgBTx/BnNwfwqgGbO4x/DTTzve2FrtgfHIodcyDM=; b=HudkaEJqUVEDi9Tc4ZQe86YEleVlq5q0ZqWuBr1xolDhZz2YvzAc14wSQp3Kjigoe7 GFdm9/bzQ/T8yjiFpjZjQ+9IDd5roFqcebFF+qU8xTswlBfnIWwDEhSxJiMxuh3Lhtxd LKUj7nYcc2U3+UGvAugdpATn+V0Dup88DrFiJdki4uRu9imiQXqDCV4kwdcXgrrbQB4I QYKTaoR+/yT+WsNw6oYp9NtlR419h0Gx4uQ5kHgNdqOoMPocNMEH9L+O2fgOgdCz6IyW TfyS93gNcK+iQ5R0VEthBGsCSehSVNfcSnyV3C/3dEVokChu7+fwPej3Jn3WeqkmboOg rxwQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmjd8USk7RIDvbolXbNDZTtUf4ARdwsv2uuCshp62mW99QcOVSIacIKKAfr9SlmcVIuhd/A X-Received: by 10.66.190.104 with SMTP id gp8mr55009586pac.15.1430905301656; Wed, 06 May 2015 02:41:41 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.140.89.139 with SMTP id v11ls73128qgd.84.gmail; Wed, 06 May 2015 02:41:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.31.196 with SMTP id f62mr370314qgf.30.1430905300756; Wed, 06 May 2015 02:41:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <49c358a2-d19a-415f-a4fa-1ff67286a0ad@isocpp.org> X-Original-Sender: morwenn29@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:17719 Archived-At: ------=_Part_181_1167576531.1430905299966 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_182_1900673878.1430905299966" ------=_Part_182_1900673878.1430905299966 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am not here to contribute to the debate but only to dhow support: it's a= =20 feature that I have desired from time to time and the way you describe it= =20 makes it trivial to understand and use. I like the use of override. Oh=20 yeah, by the way, is it possible to implement such a proposal while keeping= =20 override a contextual keyword or does it have to become a full-fledge=20 keyword? Le mardi 5 mai 2015 18:21:24 UTC+2, John Yates a =C3=A9crit : > > I have been writing embedded systems in C++ for nearly 20 years. =20 > Repeatedly I have encountered a desire to access class properties more=20 > cheaply that via a call to a virtual method. This seems (at least to me)= a=20 > very natural extension of C++ storage specifiers and the semantics of=20 > virtual name lookup. I have finally gotten around to writing a brief=20 > proposal=20 > .=20 > Very curious what other may think. > --=20 ---=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposa= ls/. ------=_Part_182_1900673878.1430905299966 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I am not here to contribute to the debate but only to dhow= support: it's a feature that I have desired from time to time and the way = you describe it makes it trivial to understand and use. I like the use of <= span style=3D"font-family: courier new,monospace;">override. Oh yeah= , by the way, is it possible to implement such a proposal while keeping override a contextu= al keyword or does it have to become a full-fledge keyword?

Le mardi= 5 mai 2015 18:21:24 UTC+2, John Yates a =C3=A9crit :
I have been writing embedded systems in C++ = for nearly 20 years.  Repeatedly I have encountered a desire to access= class properties more cheaply that via a call to a virtual method.  T= his seems (at least to me) a very natural extension of C++ storage specifie= rs and the semantics of virtual name lookup.  I have finally  got= ten around to writing a = brief proposal.  Very curious what other may think.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposa= ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
------=_Part_182_1900673878.1430905299966-- ------=_Part_181_1167576531.1430905299966-- .