220 17237 <45d4c30d-72b4-474a-9df6-9efa17d4d0b1@isocpp.org> article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tef@tentity.com Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Generic Parallel Computing (GPC) API Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 07:46:58 -0700 (PDT) Lines: 103 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: <45d4c30d-72b4-474a-9df6-9efa17d4d0b1@isocpp.org> References: <3be1928f-2116-4712-be20-7368682abf26@isocpp.org> <81e0ac7b-2e97-4ecc-8c37-c9851be3d81c@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_1368_1702201582.1428158818932" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1428158825 15812 80.91.229.3 (4 Apr 2015 14:47:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 14:47:05 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBDL4BSXDYUBBBY7S76UAKGQEBYU6ZAA@isocpp.org Sat Apr 04 16:47:04 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-yk0-f199.google.com ([209.85.160.199]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YePLh-00074w-9p for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 16:47:01 +0200 Original-Received: by ykeg184 with SMTP id g184sf145096392yke.3 for ; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 07:47:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=j+MmV/PWr+7I0u0cqZjQ/GZQY20GbbioXloJ32b1BnU=; b=k6fgkTlFZ65uuEHn1OM0Hm+fh1RZorQhexpQJHJbrETKHayFt09z86kLp9nGnZKkT/ uLvXUq4SbLJu7Z+GsE9C8J4atjg/g5Ym33ul0DgBrqIIP3n4lgIAmtdfA71jujz0f530 KpaNgGOp1pMNNs8xz6J3Yz911bO8j+cWVIR27mivYAD3m07+ShaG+vAaxWhHlmpqgJup hEvkSWZRm162eXmW90o9swD+7JKEnm2BkbS6AQ4eHxHJ1z84i485hhj3QQuZLpFdiWS+ eEFEB01vZX1Vv6l37k9QjxSbm5WaUS1gH4EfbTL7+VLwdu1mFPWLJ0hnbOmNl0IlQVR6 H9fQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlql/jv09iruQGjcPgy2B5NRKv/yFJyz6uB2wlpwAPssrxE4AbuQNef0fCjsAXYI4fjnTJ+ X-Received: by 10.236.11.196 with SMTP id 44mr8426013yhx.31.1428158820018; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 07:47:00 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.140.47.120 with SMTP id l111ls1600318qga.8.gmail; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 07:46:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.92.226 with SMTP id b89mr87427qge.29.1428158819387; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 07:46:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <81e0ac7b-2e97-4ecc-8c37-c9851be3d81c@isocpp.org> X-Original-Sender: tef@tentity.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:17237 Archived-At: ------=_Part_1368_1702201582.1428158818932 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1369_124843340.1428158818933" ------=_Part_1369_124843340.1428158818933 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks.=20 Now I am thinking "qumex" which abbreviation for *Qu*eue of *M*utual *Ex* clusion.=20 Would it be better? On Friday, April 3, 2015 at 6:48:48 PM UTC-4, Arthur O'Dwyer wrote: > > On Friday, April 3, 2015 at 5:15:13 AM UTC-7, t...@tentity.com wrote: >> >> Quetex is Mutual Exclusion Queue. It eliminates blocking/waiting and=20 >> thread switching in comparison to mutexes and futures. >> >> gpc::quetex qtx; >> >> > Not related to the semantics, but FYI, "quetex" looks like it ought to be= =20 > pronounced "kaytex", and you lose the pun. Consider "queuetex" or "qutex"= =20 > instead. :) > > =E2=80=93Arthur > --=20 ---=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposa= ls/. ------=_Part_1369_124843340.1428158818933 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks. 
Now I am thinking "qumex" which abbrevia= tion for Queue of Mutual Exclusion. 
Wo= uld it be better?

On Friday, April 3, 2015 at 6:48:48 PM UTC-4, Arth= ur O'Dwyer wrote:
On Friday, April 3, 2015 at 5:15:13 AM UTC-7, t...@tentity.com w= rote:

Quetex is Mutual Exclusion Queue. It eliminates = blocking/waiting and thread switching in comparison to mutexes and futures.=


=  gpc::quetex<int> qtx;

<= br>
Not related to the semantics, but FYI, "quetex" looks like it= ought to be pronounced "kaytex", and you lose the pun. Consider "queuetex"= or "qutex" instead. :)

=E2=80=93Arthur

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposa= ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
------=_Part_1369_124843340.1428158818933-- ------=_Part_1368_1702201582.1428158818932-- .