220 15334 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Olaf van der Spek Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: Isn't it time we had the bool std::[container]::contains() family of methods? Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 01:52:21 +0100 Lines: 16 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <0959f2f8-acdd-4786-b6f3-0f05c62dcee6@isocpp.org> <2df86492-548f-42c8-86d6-fe1c8ba3a5a9@isocpp.org> <2f390ec3-b259-4150-9771-cd0d02860348@isocpp.org> <3743ebda-3367-4fc3-922a-f38d98e57889@isocpp.org> <1bccb2dd-4aa4-4f07-8958-b1d6bf092630@isocpp.org> <46cc4da5-98d1-471f-ab31-714ac5502853@isocpp.org> <6ad78bb4-b21b-4978-90be-b99ef6d15414@isocpp.org> <1c016fbb-7268-4c69-b9ab-510fb78c4125@isocpp.org> <6f64e72f-ac64-4985-9a00-c29a71990cd2@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1419641552 25627 80.91.229.3 (27 Dec 2014 00:52:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 00:52:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mw_triad@users.sourceforge.net To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBC5NB45SSABBBRMF7CSAKGQE7NWAV4Y@isocpp.org Sat Dec 27 01:52:25 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-oi0-f69.google.com ([209.85.218.69]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y4fcF-0006oV-Gr for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 01:52:23 +0100 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-f69.google.com with SMTP id v63sf184588065oia.0 for ; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 16:52:22 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=MPQlpTCkfvAChcBPTVxB+fqbWcjvsWLc91EBgCgQ4tU=; b=YX5iL9IJaAlwxJmc0+yzCJ/fMcyaZocQtEUuQcJo2w40Hr/GR7134dyjTLA+97cLzQ c38vdSWugEjyQELwQEjxpz06GpgIH4Ie/qlSh4v7KawIQC4yiuxQX6bhCC4ck1+56oYw 7R5+QDEeLk0w7fUNoFWvczMOdHQxN2gmuz4aHCnPuuA1IOGDF3rF6hAYcBxDsGOQ6jad 2P6rPmgQRquea6k5XCzagenf/hJ56kMVW+bYBApp79JBRvD84HfGrxaiTWIhyaYVzUFl zufcGQNk+SUAOxOKRwIJTGV/T+86eGv1VWofEaCF+UAnhdcjgYAUU+a8f6PRrmAjvTnq 5XfQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm/qBy+f37yedqVBWJErmXIM/qgRurt5pzVNSx3QZmskl6bNokHGHKs0vkOe9pEqKluiL4V X-Received: by 10.182.158.73 with SMTP id ws9mr21351887obb.46.1419641542113; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 16:52:22 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.140.18.198 with SMTP id 64ls1592253qgf.96.gmail; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 16:52:21 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.140.39.116 with SMTP id u107mr69014624qgu.98.1419641541406; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 16:52:21 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from mail-qc0-x22b.google.com (mail-qc0-x22b.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22b]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b5si33149736qat.123.2014.12.26.16.52.21 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 26 Dec 2014 16:52:21 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of olafvdspek@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22b as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22b; Original-Received: by mail-qc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id r5so7881063qcx.30 for ; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 16:52:21 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.140.98.162 with SMTP id o31mr69891502qge.49.1419641541316; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 16:52:21 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.229.151.70 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 16:52:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6f64e72f-ac64-4985-9a00-c29a71990cd2@isocpp.org> X-Original-Sender: olafvdspek@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of olafvdspek@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22b as permitted sender) smtp.mail=olafvdspek@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:15334 Archived-At: On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Andy Prowl wrote: > To conclude, IMO what is essential to have is a standard "contains()"; other > algorithms may be added, but I don't find it compelling. Sounding natural sounds nice but IMO isn't a great argument. What's the ratio of contains()'s to find()'s in your code? In mine find() (or a wrapper of it) is far more common than contains(). -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. .