220 15172 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: sasho648 Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Inline variables - superior of templates and constexpr. Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:37:03 -0800 (PST) Lines: 56 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <84da1bdc-3356-4c40-a29a-bdd4c0b058b4@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_286_320533992.1419014223861" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1419014235 26949 80.91.229.3 (19 Dec 2014 18:37:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 18:37:15 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBDBNZXHN2QPRBUPA2GSAKGQEFKJEYEY@isocpp.org Fri Dec 19 19:37:08 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-ig0-f200.google.com ([209.85.213.200]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y22QE-0000pD-Mt for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 19:37:06 +0100 Original-Received: by mail-ig0-f200.google.com with SMTP id h15sf6308705igd.11 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:37:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=EZe5ma5EHkvDSTn8eopIMIKbeOnBcxm5LBOmiZyp6CA=; b=kly3xrdV5bSBwq/mrFno+lXsYsNweS+OYBRbHsvBvCQ3XnFgIK/CLVuCsQqE83hnlK YNN6qV/US4hnCheJpktsVzrCadUx6xP3VVhwQ1Em3BaKRwzHZi3ynVEHrvoteI2x8tUE gT1uVC1uNmjQs6XWw4QIMoQuGk1OG7oc8HcN0eR2nMx04PFQK342HECsGx0FSu019ARV ErBKAKFhsdNiGZEfz1brysjwWpBeukX22snNoEsj+AzNkCcP++HIR/0kYspm4arFuHDY AqvJRMqZMKn5ofZnHNuGEiRE4qngZFUspzcYqMz6YamPVNVT1hKAyHXFgr7YJXp0c+Ci TeLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkFH64EMP4C9I9X5nrbZxO/hlm8ug5ccs75uEeBrZeSux5cnnIOV6fIRIR9SOaxwXh0eZS2 X-Received: by 10.182.252.164 with SMTP id zt4mr6773837obc.1.1419014225514; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:37:05 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.140.28.117 with SMTP id 108ls110105qgy.8.gmail; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:37:04 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.140.22.199 with SMTP id 65mr173090qgn.4.1419014224879; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:37:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <84da1bdc-3356-4c40-a29a-bdd4c0b058b4@isocpp.org> X-Original-Sender: sasho648@mail.bg Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:15172 Archived-At: ------=_Part_286_320533992.1419014223861 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_287_1325816868.1419014223861" ------=_Part_287_1325816868.1419014223861 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 A proposal have those things after being boiled-down. Here we are just discussing it. My motivation was mentioned more than twice in this discussion. It seems however that you can't figure out arguments against it other than that 'why we need to easy our lives by skip writing some code?', 'why do we need an easy way of writing 'general functions'?', 'why do we need to optimize some programs as compiler does just fine?' (as I clearly showed an example where it doesn't), 'why do we need to detect program errors at compile-time as UB in run-time is just fine?'. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. ------=_Part_287_1325816868.1419014223861 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
A proposal have those things after being boiled-down. Here= we are just discussing it. My motivation was mentioned more than twice in = this discussion. It seems however that you can't figure out arguments again= st it other than that 'why we need to easy our lives by skip writing some c= ode?', 'why do we need an easy way of writing 'general functions'?', 'why d= o we need to optimize some programs as compiler does just fine?' (as I clea= rly showed an example where it doesn't), 'why do we need to detect program = errors at compile-time as UB in run-time is just fine?'.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposa= ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
------=_Part_287_1325816868.1419014223861-- ------=_Part_286_320533992.1419014223861-- .