220 14273 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ville Voutilainen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: comment on n4244 Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 12:33:57 +0200 Lines: 30 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <5d78c59b-4d67-45f6-9d99-8c4beeeac055@isocpp.org> <5344687e-e1de-4205-885c-b5c2f9580129@isocpp.org> <187da710-8adc-4516-bf64-263951503bc7@isocpp.org> <42ddf641-27c7-42a5-ab1c-772667797e5b@isocpp.org> <05a08ac6-f9b8-4ebb-9cb8-9a37a6fd4527@isocpp.org> <3ff7fe35-37c6-4f95-8701-1798b0112c10@isocpp.org> <934c6ace-40cc-484a-96ea-b05aff88482d@isocpp.org> <9082f48e-088c-4d96-99b2-2ad6e0721283@isocpp.org> <81ae79cc-453a-4cff-9e18-4b5a7914ba1a@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1414492447 14004 80.91.229.3 (28 Oct 2014 10:34:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:34:07 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBC5JHI7A7ALRBFXCXWRAKGQEGABH7JY@isocpp.org Tue Oct 28 11:34:01 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f72.google.com ([209.85.220.72]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xj46C-00007r-9A for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 11:34:00 +0100 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f72.google.com with SMTP id kx10sf1859152pab.11 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 03:33:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=m3pzLYFQmjRftNTxIe00zRc4kq5zLZcXlDkyBNPUs6I=; b=iXcSZrNPZHUIkIGsTSrqqgifisYGbkYrmoYLcFFd99kO5Klzko6tQl4S8GP+hhEcqC 23kk/Fr1BUjqjzu44KWqokQopbZHt238BxAOTVyy17Gx4NuZdQUbNLbp9oRdANEZoc4Q 1UFA6dSLzE9aNFaE5hdKLpFCc4XQBEVnuBkuMQDGItV5w7yptN68JbKSAcFe9u7/abcv nbJSyaSPxQujlA7FsJs4/Gio1RXLkYd8/n623Z4+WhmctDzkzzMVRgEo7V1HUjYrxGWa LUHPyrEF6QePF1RzwFe4t8njUVQ/heJfzGQDS0HxRQnjustINfv8B1CZ9eP3JhIOn0TT P8dA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkYZfAYZXtz6D+evFVuJfx4jVNo40loi702Vl2zqjuk9uwjCdNKPsiE4Y23RfyI5n+WjcIt X-Received: by 10.70.98.204 with SMTP id ek12mr1667060pdb.8.1414492439205; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 03:33:59 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.182.89.193 with SMTP id bq1ls45188obb.44.gmail; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 03:33:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.60.161.115 with SMTP id xr19mr2201984oeb.8.1414492438268; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 03:33:58 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-ob0-x230.google.com (mail-ob0-x230.google.com. [2607:f8b0:4003:c01::230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b13si962788obf.33.2014.10.28.03.33.58 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Oct 2014 03:33:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ville.voutilainen@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4003:c01::230 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4003:c01::230; Original-Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id va2so258776obc.7 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 03:33:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.60.131.239 with SMTP id op15mr2192638oeb.22.1414492438075; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 03:33:58 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.76.189.10 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 03:33:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: ville.voutilainen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ville.voutilainen@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4003:c01::230 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ville.voutilainen@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:14273 Archived-At: On 28 October 2014 12:00, Giovanni Piero Deretta wrot= e: > On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 7:12:24 AM UTC, Germ=C3=A1n Diago wrote: >> >> 1. Making mutex (and others) movable. The semantics for mutex ummovable >> are just semantic or are they a technical limitation? > > > It doesn't make sense to move a mutex as it is its address that is releva= nt. > But for the same reason, there are no use cases for a movable mutex (and > very very few uses as a local object). Even if the address of a mutex wouldn't be relevant, moving a mutex would a= llow moving a mutex across threads. Such shenanigans make no sense whatsoever. ;= ) --=20 ---=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposa= ls/. .