220 14136 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Olaf van der Spek Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: #pragma once Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:48:50 +0200 Lines: 21 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <3d0ab5b0-73d9-434a-9ae4-cd47d8275590@isocpp.org> <202c5550-8669-4b45-aa39-9a8d26c37015@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1414003742 10124 80.91.229.3 (22 Oct 2014 18:49:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:49:02 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBC5NB45SSABBBEXYT6RAKGQE7UONWDA@isocpp.org Wed Oct 22 20:48:52 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-pd0-f199.google.com ([209.85.192.199]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xh0xo-0008S1-Ey for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:48:52 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-pd0-f199.google.com with SMTP id g10sf19649425pdj.10 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:48:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=dzLTGZMvt0cZpYuzBRCSARN6qpJocZ2kH8dxj3ROwyc=; b=RD/hlDs0OR9jdOMjGhjcXqgQG9N0zllrOg0TUUExg9Jhe80bumz5Niz6+3OCVp3JF0 woc4igxdYNtmLpaJ28AJZw80TDsw13pQt0PpflQj8qGNRKaAAG11ULmM6YgpCN2S8PdX NwYDKU2XRnq4TZNp8DBgaQsXhVdSF9m5snElvhcO0mEGwLgo6jnXju6PNkMmXdeY7WRb qs1aoAKvveNz2v8NHnfxWoXwu6yRYVzOn2rNCGMS9IxywI6gV+0QfphbQay0L17RHJx9 /Gyhrp9FFRWsXvt1J6StIg25ab9TNxSwGsO8XSj15qz0Yp6HV+AebSakEOTq5qJxUnad R8Sw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl8YJqtA33dBylvPcR55M50eWuAYkzLVOtymEN+cNrKe1hUfKwOfaE3VgsVzzTHFerGZkut X-Received: by 10.68.228.102 with SMTP id sh6mr16537pbc.4.1414003731183; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:48:51 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.140.16.199 with SMTP id 65ls834871qgb.67.gmail; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:48:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.224.97.72 with SMTP id k8mr59440397qan.25.1414003730499; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:48:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-qg0-x22f.google.com (mail-qg0-x22f.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22f]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c7si21027577qah.83.2014.10.22.11.48.50 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:48:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of olafvdspek@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22f as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22f; Original-Received: by mail-qg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id i50so2959032qgf.6 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:48:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.98.54 with SMTP id n51mr12938703qge.79.1414003730391; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:48:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.229.202.133 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:48:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: olafvdspek@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of olafvdspek@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22f as permitted sender) smtp.mail=olafvdspek@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:14136 Archived-At: On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Bo Persson wrote: > One advantage of an include guard is that YOU can fix the conflicts you run > into. If the compiler's #pragma once fails to include a file, what do you do > about that? File a bug report and fall back to include guards (or something else). > And should the standard require all compiler developers to have a mainframe > in their test environment, so I can be sure that the pragma works on my > system? Of course :p -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. .