220 13970 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Smith Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: Reconstruct function idea Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:16:27 -0700 Lines: 81 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <97aba3ad-71d1-46ef-88e5-ee00137df7fb@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1a2365b849e05058fece8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1413490595 5950 80.91.229.3 (16 Oct 2014 20:16:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 20:16:35 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBDVNBJG4YAIBBG6PQCRAKGQE4S3I7AY@isocpp.org Thu Oct 16 22:16:30 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f71.google.com ([209.85.220.71]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XerTK-0007ns-0n for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 22:16:30 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f71.google.com with SMTP id rd3sf22165261pab.10 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:16:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=xc+1WO4l/4UR5k7CTBRcVth/N/RSfgvrmKKV99wJl2Q=; b=Smn1BS/JJFhbVLJm9QwbpelS+lnu3joQzrkT2NrmbRoRdasjoUburdeubxVhmaNkhN vsAanGkGzvJ4NJEqhf4o6tmfGLFGS8TFOhRC8tkkiMdJxwdQVSJslhweW0hxLKDfioWC u1Smmhro6MEOnrU/EFuR/ENMKowLjfZg5eRat/zmFYChNlwjEhtRPvxgFM/8IXzlE7a2 eYSXAT81SSi1wX0NGh8YyO36SwpZbbz7pl3SfihPfVdpCs/J3fLidW1IbuBe1fSU8p+X HvgPT2puMdUok0wG+0KDpTWLAAVUdmQrs/7FzJx9FGesVPv5ezhz4XYRzijReFQ8oo9W AhuA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmxb6R1piYMwnPOn6mCu8ED2NwytXTDcwHzqd1sOnIE0elZcVgl4u5bMHqwdXxuHAsXqeEq X-Received: by 10.66.90.164 with SMTP id bx4mr2327194pab.2.1413490588307; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:16:28 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.140.29.71 with SMTP id a65ls916382qga.11.gmail; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:16:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.52.145.197 with SMTP id sw5mr2697866vdb.71.1413490587532; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:16:27 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-vc0-x230.google.com (mail-vc0-x230.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c03::230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id jl2si21979763vdb.15.2014.10.16.13.16.27 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:16:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of metafoo@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::230 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c03::230; Original-Received: by mail-vc0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hq11so3319164vcb.35 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:16:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.220.202.72 with SMTP id fd8mr3253623vcb.59.1413490587434; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:16:27 -0700 (PDT) Original-Sender: metafoo@gmail.com Original-Received: by 10.220.65.138 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:16:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <97aba3ad-71d1-46ef-88e5-ee00137df7fb@isocpp.org> X-Original-Sender: richard@metafoo.co.uk X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of metafoo@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::230 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=metafoo@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:13970 Archived-At: --001a11c1a2365b849e05058fece8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Markus Grech wrote: > I'm very surprised that nobody here knows how to write copy&swap correctly. > T& operator =(T rhs) > { > swap(rhs); > return *this; > } > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7458110/c-unified-assignment-operator-move-semantics/7458222#7458222 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18303287/when-is-overloading-pass-by-reference-l-value-and-r-value-preferred-to-pass-by/18303787#18303787 -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. --001a11c1a2365b849e05058fece8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposa= ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
--001a11c1a2365b849e05058fece8-- .