220 13797 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nevin Liber Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: D4183-01 Contiguous Iterators - Pointer Conversion & Type Trait Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 09:38:38 -0700 Lines: 64 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <23f0af50-6ac5-499f-a4a7-0604c3e367a1@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0444022ee036d2050500126b X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1412872773 20345 80.91.229.3 (9 Oct 2014 16:39:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 16:39:33 +0000 (UTC) To: "std-proposals@isocpp.org" Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCE35H5S6IDBBN7U3KQQKGQETNHZ3NA@isocpp.org Thu Oct 09 18:39:27 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-wi0-f197.google.com ([209.85.212.197]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XcGkK-0005m1-5t for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 18:39:20 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-wi0-f197.google.com with SMTP id n3sf1223975wiv.4 for ; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 09:39:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=cpmyNHI5VPqRxcqv6hmtRcKJojmEE/lpbi/nrSbU/sE=; b=WwqreLStXBhuFPYD/37qFTBkDhpILDv0AsRFcvTUUU/7UUOjpb8YPDB8vCXi+1aN9D hLndPwuH3umdYvCRCExjvSnMd0V5TNNBFw0ZzGBGh2BIQbi0/4uo5YpZRjePF3vGuX/d xfBYHX4+g/T2P+WbYEqdIuthVERTXHgMmOL6Y7pYpZS65+Nkg7eCRg2/rkYdVzx/o1Pe Mva4F10GbhADjkipBzsZNbMU7VdafTRujU26H7/+dBv/pNA2CMJfb4MYgBRCTaMufuOq +y1RAD3dELBO6nJJkvq2FWqE8viXopEv8lZ9KZQDBPIzrzFH87+IKN+MOmNGhg+102t1 uZ7g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk3+mXIwsfD6OdKvsl3+nI9oVZ0HNKTLFpZ7VpDEZMFNT2ZjLSuSA90jLqZBH46cPLqnXFU X-Received: by 10.180.39.38 with SMTP id m6mr1034158wik.7.1412872759833; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 09:39:19 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.181.13.45 with SMTP id ev13ls1085063wid.17.canary; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 09:39:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.71.229 with SMTP id y5mr5419285wju.129.1412872758776; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 09:39:18 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x232.google.com (mail-wi0-x232.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c05::232]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hl9si4559398wjc.81.2014.10.09.09.39.18 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Oct 2014 09:39:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nliber@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::232 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::232; Original-Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id cc10so2375383wib.5 for ; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 09:39:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.84.5 with SMTP id u5mr13894328wiy.17.1412872758374; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 09:39:18 -0700 (PDT) Original-Sender: nliber@gmail.com Original-Received: by 10.194.242.198 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 09:38:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: nevin@eviloverlord.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nliber@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::232 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nliber@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:13797 Archived-At: --f46d0444022ee036d2050500126b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 9 October 2014 09:28, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > I know, but what were there arguments in relation to boost's get_pointer? > I wasn't in Issaquah (or I would have voted against that). According to the LEWG wiki, it was Eric Niebler's suggestion, but there are no other notes on it, other than the vote (6 weakly in favor, 5 neutral). Anyway, I'll add Boost's get_pointer to the document, and bring it up during the discussion. -- Nevin ":-)" Liber (847) 691-1404 -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. --f46d0444022ee036d2050500126b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 9 October 2014 09:28, Olaf v= an der Spek <olafvdspek@gmail.com> wrote:
I know, but what were there arguments in rela= tion to boost's get_pointer?

I wasn't in Issaquah (or I woul= d have voted against that).=C2=A0 According to the LEWG wiki, it was Eric N= iebler's suggestion, but there are no other notes on it, other than the= vote (6 weakly in favor, 5 neutral).

Anyway, I&#= 39;ll add Boost's get_pointer to the document, and bring it up during t= he discussion.
--
=C2=A0Nevin ":-)" Liber=C2=A0 <mail= to:nevin@evilov= erlord.com>=C2=A0 (847) 691-1404

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposa= ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
--f46d0444022ee036d2050500126b-- .