220 13497 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ville Voutilainen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: Generalizing the equivalence of auto and template type deduction Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 12:13:09 +0300 Lines: 20 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <0bf78c13-6ee2-4a9a-9de5-5ce2dc0e5a66@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1412241199 14622 80.91.229.3 (2 Oct 2014 09:13:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 09:13:19 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBC5JHI7A7ALRBJNOWSQQKGQEP2OOJTA@isocpp.org Thu Oct 02 11:13:13 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-ie0-f200.google.com ([209.85.223.200]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XZcRk-0007oh-4W for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 11:13:12 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-ie0-f200.google.com with SMTP id rl12sf8031372iec.11 for ; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 02:13:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=6Dza7F7cqXZD7fSihLOq6XHffBVwjf+2xwIVcLTv230=; b=mKI0IDaBA/qzLqzLByQn8LYLiExn1sIqgiz5EyfDo0+4RNRfPLggi+eF8pVraaJDw+ daNYUdQXfC48ARfnIqHAW3dut4/LUJqkXZv1LuZqZv4CSMx9W7BfTT3oF/fFqE7Ixnil MDvQvbCU0pPo67BIooS9aQoz0vlGOYRl/fWe+PmNy0xJx1JxGAcAZCrVNYp8B/wcYdB/ b5q5NZDWxV+1fXu/4ZIPBMD3+OpdtonUAGS5Dl7e+/KKybiaAZb0t8Jz82pp4pprdqah lxMXG3q7+gBBu8pfF2O1krMHqPUY5uXlXCvyz7JrZxpzbQ13CJu2jQTC02KvvOZM5o2N 0sGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnJxseIcWClI8JwStVzx9HUFntKPFjCHEIWhQZgoEljyFgziAcKlXOIjCKHST/AGe40QLUW X-Received: by 10.182.166.73 with SMTP id ze9mr50121596obb.4.1412241190273; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 02:13:10 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.182.176.39 with SMTP id cf7ls328042obc.89.gmail; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 02:13:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.209.101 with SMTP id ml5mr63579877obc.2.1412241189685; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 02:13:09 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x236.google.com (mail-oi0-x236.google.com [2607:f8b0:4003:c06::236]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ts9si6267959oeb.39.2014.10.02.02.13.09 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Oct 2014 02:13:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ville.voutilainen@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::236 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4003:c06::236; Original-Received: by mail-oi0-f54.google.com with SMTP id v63so1601885oia.27 for ; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 02:13:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.186.73 with SMTP id fi9mr64457697obc.0.1412241189541; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 02:13:09 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.76.24.198 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 02:13:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <0bf78c13-6ee2-4a9a-9de5-5ce2dc0e5a66@isocpp.org> X-Original-Sender: ville.voutilainen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ville.voutilainen@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ville.voutilainen@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:13497 Archived-At: On 2 October 2014 11:43, Tomasz wrote: > My proposal is that every use of placholder (today we have only auto, but > concept name would be a possible extension) would introduce separate > typename, so: > std::pair p = f(); > > Would use equivalent deduction as: > template > void foo(std::pair); That's already how it works. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. .