220 13416 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Matthew Fioravante Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: atof(string_view) and others Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:06:52 -0700 (PDT) Lines: 69 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <2118839.fukHYmiT6S@tjmaciei-mobl4> <77247918-fbe5-418d-ab30-8b4b852dace9@isocpp.org> <6449799.vbEiQqPBsP@tjmaciei-mobl4> <40810ee8-49fe-4dc7-94cc-e33969f2f90a@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2181_2020946045.1412132812802" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1412132822 11917 80.91.229.3 (1 Oct 2014 03:07:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 03:07:02 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBDELF54RTIGRBTO7VWQQKGQE7DUKKVA@isocpp.org Wed Oct 01 05:06:56 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-ob0-f200.google.com ([209.85.214.200]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XZAFj-0006xi-1l for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 05:06:55 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-ob0-f200.google.com with SMTP id wn1sf1635260obc.3 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:06:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=EAFDUox/uLiIW8TggVqQx7bpPRuNFSgLi52TmIeqah4=; b=rOjB1ISg8PAuzO6wvP2ygas9QBFy6ITC9XgIMsNI/oVSnJTuMmxjHYJplLd2JEzAtJ zBsJrI26xxVafpT4Vx/UTR4Uxoq106ZtHTgaA+qh3WYm13Chgk1MVBZxHQDG5HoSOkm8 sRIfy0ZQTfNweRoMomijPn8LVmPh277giOWxOu0g9/liMQpwmv3bWnBHk/WkmnIosASI ri3N4jSUp4EpeBPp8La1wklUKk/i7Yb+GRkkcpoBG4uP2wN5F5gzT9EqSPmfCXAEwX4i mSLfceEKu4Z43IPn3rcnBBhifLwLwuDK2FfhW0PSDvcGSPrAlYzqrzRdpy8CZp2rWMBx U5eA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence :mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=EAFDUox/uLiIW8TggVqQx7bpPRuNFSgLi52TmIeqah4=; b=FvNm4clNcyz8Xm9BNcg5Ss8h8hNteNaIIDYEA8qGkv8gzgI16PEI1uIvHKcXA1eUug kz5GiIpPqjpClQXQmYd/eimjuBqO3hVxz5BkV0RTKIDPTg4hLSG8P0adCpbX0Ijv323Y ghzwRBsHfzLMnO0BLdHqB2h7NS7urlsMXW1ad9VyaQ+SOLMLHdsZMlY2ckk62dfKegVy DjmS3RI1MZkqX6sEs96nuoxEIuGPf2se47wcUFK8pLUUSOZ0bAMS+06cC2QPh7ZnBkha 47JrpGHmGO5rAZDZnudX5k4ke198m41A2b068713gX4fzR0rhLAcIqES6mlCxp8plHLG nt2A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmCB7wsbq8QHaeeHwVSqMxPLaCSo5QSyXq+tlu5N4WNtpZWGBhoML/vp0iYfLdrpQDJme1C X-Received: by 10.182.246.195 with SMTP id xy3mr1434124obc.45.1412132814050; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:06:54 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.140.81.147 with SMTP id f19ls352433qgd.24.gmail; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:06:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.97.131 with SMTP id m3mr330qge.28.1412132813474; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:06:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <40810ee8-49fe-4dc7-94cc-e33969f2f90a@isocpp.org> X-Original-Sender: fmatthew5876@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:13416 Archived-At: ------=_Part_2181_2020946045.1412132812802 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 10:57:22 PM UTC-4, Matthew Fioravante wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 10:40:50 PM UTC-4, Thiago Macieira wrote: >> >> >> Forget it. Non-inline functions can't be constexpr and those functions >> shouldn't be inline. >> > > I agree about the floating point conversions. But does it really have to > be this way for integer conversions? Parsing ints is not that complex. > > One use case for constexpr is that it would enable these functions to be used for creating user defined literals. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. ------=_Part_2181_2020946045.1412132812802 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 10:57:22 PM UTC-4, = Matthew Fioravante wrote:


On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 10:40:50 PM UTC-4, Thiag= o Macieira wrote:

Forget it. Non-inline functions can't be constexpr and those functions= =20
shouldn't be inline.

I agree about the floating point conve= rsions. But does it really have to be this way for integer conversions? Par= sing ints is not that complex.
 

One use case for constexpr is that it would enable these f= unctions to be used for creating user defined literals. 

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposa= ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
------=_Part_2181_2020946045.1412132812802-- .