220 13382 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?QWd1c3TDrW4gSy1iYWxsbyBCZXJnw6k=?= Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: proposal: deprecate failure to return (without annotation) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 13:55:53 -0300 Lines: 31 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <2106187.KAVOBzdsgo@tjmaciei-mobl4> <7890243.H6e3ul2NkU@tjmaciei-mobl4> <6cc0543b-ce2b-4cf3-bc18-bf1a5be8a270@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1412096169 16938 80.91.229.3 (30 Sep 2014 16:56:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:56:09 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBD2JZ7PP7QERBHOBVOQQKGQE47O6HNI@isocpp.org Tue Sep 30 18:56:02 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f70.google.com ([209.85.220.70]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XZ0iV-00050Y-6e for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 18:55:59 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f70.google.com with SMTP id et14sf14905249pad.9 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:55:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=c4LTor1eeUKwTIqakPBZYC/HA+uBsqTHsZ/f6kTvjhw=; b=UPhLttx2uDaYP2oQ2HDD0CkP145M605k2U6IV8sv8Xl0h5ZJXqu4cjqZ0X/S6cLtfj 3DZs8lqNcBEXyz4jFCZsS6RfKDGaBBKrgQAKH9S5ByuMWMCBVIob7R+jA7WxDHUZoLuM 0HvWNnYZrfUKBgC3+is/MnSCxvKfMnwwbal5Q9xz9KUKNVjfPYUVbV7upytWygF8zj06 EJ9cr+qHS10/kyUiNPHmDfdXt9PaLTS2qBxSOasr2YkJSFh3oeyEGrSV+JhlzB1llga1 rdOSVsySlyowBE7jelaHFxa+h1+/xdMjIKj4shjMzL4NYCdTe0lFd0841aYPwvyQ6UPQ z+Q X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmBUW3jvWC3iNQUvdf2/096+OKTLJJ3sHryWiHGNDxzIDdTvnVEKZroLMZwG3hGO7TrJ25A X-Received: by 10.68.197.105 with SMTP id it9mr27115745pbc.5.1412096158132; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:55:58 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.140.84.209 with SMTP id l75ls155862qgd.19.gmail; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:55:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.224.80.10 with SMTP id r10mr41123021qak.24.1412096157345; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:55:57 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from BLU004-OMC1S5.hotmail.com (blu004-omc1s5.hotmail.com. [65.55.116.16]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g5si18914352qaf.123.2014.09.30.09.55.57 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:55:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of kaballo86@hotmail.com designates 65.55.116.16 as permitted sender) client-ip=65.55.116.16; Original-Received: from BLU436-SMTP236 ([65.55.116.9]) by BLU004-OMC1S5.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22724); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:55:56 -0700 X-TMN: [wQQeHsK9h1JMLnr6jxqycVP/bfCrRChB] X-Originating-Email: [kaballo86@hotmail.com] User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 In-Reply-To: <6cc0543b-ce2b-4cf3-bc18-bf1a5be8a270@isocpp.org> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Sep 2014 16:55:55.0021 (UTC) FILETIME=[6654D3D0:01CFDCCF] X-Original-Sender: kaballo86@hotmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of kaballo86@hotmail.com designates 65.55.116.16 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kaballo86@hotmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:13382 Archived-At: On 30/09/2014 06:07 a.m., Douglas Boffey wrote: > > Hmm. std::terminate injected into production code without being > explicity stated? I don=E2=80=99t think I=E2=80=99d like that=E2=80=94fo= r some production code, > premature termination is not an option. > Check out [except.terminate] for a list of scenarios where=20 `std::terminate` is injected. I believe this is not an exhaustive list. I don't have an opinion on the context in which this is proposed=20 (leaning towards against), but an injected call to terminate would make=20 sense there. Regards, --=20 Agust=C3=ADn K-ballo Berg=C3=A9.- http://talesofcpp.fusionfenix.com --=20 ---=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposa= ls/. .