220 12909 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Matheus Izvekov Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: unevaluated this Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:49:38 -0700 (PDT) Lines: 56 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <009e6218-1e2b-402d-ab1a-e8ebf29f8f77@isocpp.org> <1585029.X3zftQQog7@tjmaciei-mobl4> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2903_1262420846.1410828578449" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1410828588 30203 80.91.229.3 (16 Sep 2014 00:49:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:49:48 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCOKZ27XTMNRBI4S32QAKGQEC2Q3BJY@isocpp.org Tue Sep 16 02:49:42 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-qa0-f70.google.com ([209.85.216.70]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XTgxg-0004cs-Ko for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 02:49:40 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-qa0-f70.google.com with SMTP id s7sf12766637qap.1 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:49:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=/8ctZDAU83zbHdvT0YE9lq/gOetOoyzktRPoOdBxPjs=; b=XLHJW1l9dH1QB32QWKs5E/lgRglh4la4sxqeh7dUyz1OTV2sEwFkqFGTSQmepNL5Kt smUP7QzGn8Oh5zXWNRk6nvpv5ZjWzxBS6Q3LUi2WHsFxGKcz3yiZ4qTKyHNZD/de5E8D xhqWLoDU0Kg9VfKp3pzIo6KNUPqZylNGj7tobJAPp/0uOumFueK5QMCw7g1nPuehR4Wy koP7y/1YbcdTsvKMn+fxXGPGA+LD5zJ7H+PlhJ5lRIp5QyM1sQu48DYcDOKoZKCvEQtX wG1masNoYbz/ga9XeSdEew/vOlzEx9kta/uixdl9BFO51mLfDVGn0d75KKPOEJaAHUSd fPuA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence :mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=/8ctZDAU83zbHdvT0YE9lq/gOetOoyzktRPoOdBxPjs=; b=gIUH9o7v9GuwIIZnNEXkSFuoNnmBGpkyxH+aWURHfpUkp+Vz4xs26DBHeMl6+mGl2A AfMOmlBZsidex3qHhSNbj72NfH14+wnSPDh+/PyNTXQSbFEYh/5890m97B/hNe6Mi4IG 7BnP7ea1sY/RfvBjiF861IJCdwi07Y5fYHxZE5Nl0dtYxunEkpC5ag61SIlnvCP0frDl kdh4ykYEc9uG4wie0g2E1Of0HTrGCiNcyjyFDCE9bgvh8MwZ5yKlWaa98vuOt6Igr4JK E09znmStFJAG0kG+loKoH/ZqWgDUT1WW9xbibkz/xCyIZFRf6sUg7Znlf6zj9tf68c9e XQGw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk9EVa696fYzPDkaxUgbZzCbwm/+/1FYsR2ZanuM2qHEGY5VJCz817X7js2KlscBCm2d6kg X-Received: by 10.236.2.196 with SMTP id 44mr3439715yhf.51.1410828579846; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:49:39 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.140.17.70 with SMTP id 64ls661878qgc.37.gmail; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:49:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.102.38 with SMTP id v35mr110240qge.6.1410828579048; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:49:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1585029.X3zftQQog7@tjmaciei-mobl4> X-Original-Sender: mizvekov@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:12909 Archived-At: ------=_Part_2903_1262420846.1410828578449 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Monday, September 15, 2014 9:30:35 PM UTC-3, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > It doesn't have to be allowed in that position. decltype is a type, the > fact > that the identifier for a constructor or destructor is the same can be > considered a coincidence. > > Right. I was just wondering if that proposal would also tackle the problem of naming the constructors/destructors of anonymous classes/unions. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. ------=_Part_2903_1262420846.1410828578449 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Monday, September 15, 2014 9:30:35 PM UTC-3, Thiago Mac= ieira wrote:
It doesn't have to= be allowed in that position. decltype is a type, the fact=20
that the identifier for a constructor or destructor is the same can be= =20
considered a coincidence.


Right. I was just wondering if that proposal woul= d also tackle the problem of naming the constructors/destructors of anonymo= us classes/unions.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposa= ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
------=_Part_2903_1262420846.1410828578449-- .