220 12686 <235019326.vNoHBBe4MO@tjmaciei-mobl4> article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thiago Macieira Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: Possibilities for uniform type name declaration Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:31:45 -0700 Lines: 29 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: <235019326.vNoHBBe4MO@tjmaciei-mobl4> References: <83a1ebce-b43d-4d3f-86ea-83b1f85fd432@isocpp.org> <20140904170928.GA11632@bacon.lysator.liu.se> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1409869915 23539 80.91.229.3 (4 Sep 2014 22:31:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 22:31:55 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCB4TK757YBRBVGQUOQAKGQEXFE5W4Q@isocpp.org Fri Sep 05 00:31:51 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-wg0-f72.google.com ([74.125.82.72]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XPfZG-0006n2-SY for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 00:31:50 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-wg0-f72.google.com with SMTP id b13sf6591670wgh.3 for ; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:31:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=LDYPK0Dx4Ddelb12+wbTyYRo6AXGNT4p5cOnOVcT2Ww=; b=asF4CXXO/R2jpsirJnlP2ZmrypPXWfx0cSKngZ1caxdMoxc+TW8b6hBRt685YJ2ftT S++RVim5XCqjYi5/rKoJPU38aaIAW6yuV/geD5WI3yHl8z36RvOXd19P3U7RWaMVwUhd oGi68v266oxsSyR0BUP+UYyOlm2o0o73IUPnCRMtuwtdFCCClEUnYCRa4O9T4Iz9w4VN 5gDm+Ta98LBANa/j6y1OoGiGyqrBoljihSpSJFb4hhBBbzNdTmXdrgKTnj5FIffaJA0F ox5ZN9x7IlKC9XXeTnsXVGXkumqJ1O3iSDwdDd69bcslAu86ZtkWXnS/PV89dgUc3vAR 3bAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnH3SAECLDwV/pacgQKzqxMECqHKKkcqhhoPtlN154nVjTE0aL99cc+mWlC3ec39EjWUfbE X-Received: by 10.180.24.70 with SMTP id s6mr697257wif.3.1409869910366; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:31:50 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.152.120.38 with SMTP id kz6ls119030lab.104.gmail; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:31:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.50.52 with SMTP id z20mr6995821lbn.87.1409869908266; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:31:48 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from gondolin.macieira.info (gondolin.macieira.info. [2a01:4f8:d13:f81:21c:14ff:fe01:12a3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t14si377469laz.69.2014.09.04.15.31.48 for ; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:31:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of thiago@macieira.org designates 2a01:4f8:d13:f81:21c:14ff:fe01:12a3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a01:4f8:d13:f81:21c:14ff:fe01:12a3; Original-Received: from tjmaciei-mobl4.localnet (jfdmzpr03-ext.jf.intel.com [134.134.139.72]) by gondolin.macieira.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A946411B632 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:31:47 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: KMail/4.14 (Linux/3.11.10-21-desktop; KDE/4.14.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: thiago@macieira.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of thiago@macieira.org designates 2a01:4f8:d13:f81:21c:14ff:fe01:12a3 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=thiago@macieira.org Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:12686 Archived-At: On Thursday 04 September 2014 14:47:11 Sean Middleditch wrote: > You don't know that for forward declarations anyway. Yes, you do. There may be a problem with pointer to member functions if the class is only forward-declared, but that only happens in legacy environments (like Visual Studio without /vmg) and it technically disagrees with the standard. > This doesn't change > that. It just makes it so that you don't need to care whether a type is > defined via `struct` or `class` or `using` or a template instantiation when > making a forward declaration, just like you don't need to care in any other > context in the language. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint: E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358 -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. .