220 12523 <58746030-81C7-4A6D-8354-4FE4C4ABABCC@gmail.com> article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Krauss Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Placeholder literals Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 09:35:15 +0800 Lines: 18 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: <58746030-81C7-4A6D-8354-4FE4C4ABABCC@gmail.com> References: <570663A9-F617-442F-9B48-5B6E7311AE72@gmail.com> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1409016931 8008 80.91.229.3 (26 Aug 2014 01:35:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 01:35:31 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCW25A7E3QCRBW6I56PQKGQEUZMJCXA@isocpp.org Tue Aug 26 03:35:25 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-qg0-f71.google.com ([209.85.192.71]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XM5fQ-00005Y-SJ for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 03:35:25 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-qg0-f71.google.com with SMTP id f51sf43773535qge.10 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:35:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :message-id:references:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=+LRTtLj8zOnxd0g+n6cewJ7DGnu4E3jo8rHAd0dN+qY=; b=cQVaPGYGjml4CWwMrr8sRaeuivR7MjAx6sZLf3njRenLzdnOMuY8MbMM1PrGll2Gup Fev3gL4cm2tuLCYoVsCVwE0+j2ABRGahffKAFk7eNzyfSpq/bDK4DVF/Jmj/eOcAFchh Yq5XAbKELYJSsG12ZXVmXkd1e05kZKZeTpk6QPMKOBJKiylV7sAcjGNrCXZwvAB55lwh DPQxVywamqLSpr7hVN5ZvOezqqb32v7brJObTH/nDwllJAovaxBTGjIeOuNJY9H23WUe kk6hDGuG9dDyp4ZiU3MFRyAe6Gn025Xuk7/j5Xhd+VDYQS1KNihjrTH/CLRWciaz6kUQ d+hA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlgLpZvC0ACpSDe7TlpwOkAqbe6/sl4gNnSeOic2iIp5dXYb6wadIhBeWJCD0rdE18HDmId X-Received: by 10.236.118.37 with SMTP id k25mr3402044yhh.1.1409016924100; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:35:24 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.51.17.70 with SMTP id gc6ls1612168igd.29.canary; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:35:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.119.174 with SMTP id kv14mr33182444pab.52.1409016923298; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:35:23 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x231.google.com (mail-pa0-x231.google.com [2607:f8b0:400e:c03::231]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ol12si2146444pdb.55.2014.08.25.18.35.23 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:35:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of potswa@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::231 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400e:c03::231; Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id hz1so21934664pad.8 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:35:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.190.169 with SMTP id gr9mr8689085pac.3.1409016923004; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:35:23 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [172.20.10.2] ([121.54.54.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s8sm1868611pdj.54.2014.08.25.18.35.21 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:35:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Original-Sender: potswa@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of potswa@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::231 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=potswa@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:12523 Archived-At: On 2014-08-26, at 2:49 AM, Johannes Schaub wrote: > I think I have an excellent idea. Let us just reverse the order and > call it "1_". Then add 'operator "" _'. Reserve that "name". I think it's better to work within the existing reservations :/ . A single underscore is currently a valid suffix and it would be surprising if nobody uses it. This thread is a bit strange... -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. .