220 12462 <53FA1679.7040205@gmx.de> article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Markus Mayer Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Cryptographic hash functions reloaded [was Interest in cryptographic functions within the standard library] Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 18:44:41 +0200 Lines: 24 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: <53FA1679.7040205@gmx.de> References: <53F8F620.3090701@gmx.de> <53F9AAF7.8030602@gmx.de> <2384156.HN4M5TaOfF@tjmaciei-mobl4> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1408898692 24308 80.91.229.3 (24 Aug 2014 16:44:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 16:44:52 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBDL3H4GM24GBB65M5CPQKGQEEJHEIOA@isocpp.org Sun Aug 24 18:44:45 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-la0-f72.google.com ([209.85.215.72]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XLauK-0006yZ-PW for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 18:44:44 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-la0-f72.google.com with SMTP id ty20sf7502082lab.11 for ; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 09:44:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=TGdHPeLWFB6IVusGUTSvB7SH4F+mOCM2wWW+8N25d10=; b=d8uzOG4FZbfnikeIjaAij/k/ouJ0OBSNwZD02fUpx3Kg4tF1Ge1gx4VrRynUF/0cnw Nk6eAchDxscnEhjTDNNqrKp5/gwIw8dEEBesM9OdaPo6YhTHI/To95nnNojAHQCe621B tobuBb8K7Yi5qBAnXtGhmI6LF+W2Gmx4YMz9EMLI1lf/7Q3o8rJCazcM7RAW7+ij44Lg dzKm52nRFSREJpEC/y8BNAxJhvdK/A5RTtFtu1YSyf4d4oREJZK9V9IWiRyZTPIYBn5/ c0u3xBE0QsSelp04563soeTUCJ78N9BQJXXNWF6SH4nsDa7sGbJJrNRTNC8koCNgHawM 7FiA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmn9pg5RbCR7WBlFgaSC5uQ74fXX9+97IVSxYXlgg9IF3Ty/OH9wt/mnEubZe6zV5fCoktA X-Received: by 10.112.168.230 with SMTP id zz6mr3149lbb.10.1408898684606; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 09:44:44 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.152.26.99 with SMTP id k3ls340478lag.70.gmail; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 09:44:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.120.226 with SMTP id lf2mr15538758lbb.14.1408898683203; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 09:44:43 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net. [212.227.15.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id db4si49231553lac.29.2014.08.24.09.44.43 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 24 Aug 2014 09:44:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lotharlutz@gmx.de designates 212.227.15.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.227.15.18; Original-Received: from [192.168.178.22] ([92.194.36.58]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LlV71-1WnM1F2GYR-00bH16 for ; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 18:44:42 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0 In-Reply-To: <2384156.HN4M5TaOfF@tjmaciei-mobl4> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:+wP1+0/R82thotctiXpt79RMO0qW1vB+ypR1KEZeGcKOMvUNTCV OELqFtqWaru3S2zEYI9uhawCl2GoWaDfiezkctI4xEnJiLSX3D7xLPZEcRA4v5roJIpntcX ZI4Gdrps04ivhnJ4kX0pt550pJyoZkejAxyKt6zwzz5BE/bc6xDqBhrOSojkx8TylRVgAUd 84hAmvs/21ekcIkHl6m8w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-Original-Sender: lotharlutz@gmx.de X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lotharlutz@gmx.de designates 212.227.15.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lotharlutz@gmx.de Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:12462 Archived-At: On 08/24/2014 05:32 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Sunday 24 August 2014 11:05:59 Markus Mayer wrote: >> //Default contructable >> //Copyable >> //Moveable > > Do you mean trivially for any of the above? > > I don't see how the types could be trivially constructible. And if you allow > the implementations to allocate heap for the state, they can't be trivially > copyable, movable or destructible either. > No, I don't mean trivially. Maybe they will be noexcept, which also forbids dynamic allocation. I'm not sure if the implementors need that much flexibility. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. .