220 12459 <53FA0D5B.9030806@gmx.de> article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Markus Mayer Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Cryptographic hash functions reloaded [was Interest in cryptographic functions within the standard library] Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 18:05:47 +0200 Lines: 18 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: <53FA0D5B.9030806@gmx.de> References: <53F8F620.3090701@gmx.de> <53F9AAF7.8030602@gmx.de> <53F9DB1E.1020803@gmx.net> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1408896363 27283 80.91.229.3 (24 Aug 2014 16:06:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 16:06:03 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBDL3H4GM24GBBXM25CPQKGQE6MSD67A@isocpp.org Sun Aug 24 18:05:52 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-wi0-f200.google.com ([209.85.212.200]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XLaIg-0002xo-Uh for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 18:05:50 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-wi0-f200.google.com with SMTP id d1sf766970wiv.11 for ; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 09:05:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=YBKgb/IIqNIFS+0gN+Eviy1aq16BLrGHXFH/CoPGBKE=; b=Nvj57jx4O4oA/6OInZlaFjAeDkrY4JMkTQeEAMi8Xvj0FQCKAWAQ7RWPOlgdraT7Ry G6eneTvRIRytft3/KSvKqE/DzfGTuJmjEg2/6vIu51bvC9Z3QwrBB6yqIwF19JsiEvQy YCN0aHDEwf0TTnCAtRNnt1MeSpBNm+GSCMc6tGn+dwnc9j1PW0BVIr59HuCf5kPxz9dt BHHW7QPvU/BCenGtSJX7JADarvkdzYagtdFuIcxODVhi3ZGuFVs5QqHwujMe/S3wPSS3 EqL2Ah/vZR/DjfN3Hm2pkJemyKBCKhZ8r5ytVDyxxLgHlbnDJgV8MA3ZxQcW6CGRlOqZ MNng== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn5ArC80j4/k6yudqkhYhaU04XGiA0HPkgF0ysTuYCNsVFnyZipfKefw2D7R001GAxWF11n X-Received: by 10.194.2.130 with SMTP id 2mr4184wju.5.1408896350467; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 09:05:50 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.152.44.226 with SMTP id h2ls344566lam.31.gmail; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 09:05:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.152.205.36 with SMTP id ld4mr14352362lac.40.1408896349049; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 09:05:49 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net. [212.227.15.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id mk6si49124370lbb.29.2014.08.24.09.05.48 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 24 Aug 2014 09:05:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lotharlutz@gmx.de designates 212.227.15.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.227.15.18; Original-Received: from [192.168.178.22] ([92.194.36.58]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LlESk-1Wn4Ys1PoE-00b6yo for ; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 18:05:48 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0 In-Reply-To: <53F9DB1E.1020803@gmx.net> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:hVh7lZJAyyvydSGPRThk2Dhekj3+xGhinivg5xC+fYvmCvUeS44 RtVGtt+f+9+kcopt6UrMosvB+do+NeNV+fwYIVIcTGmmouYLYv7cdCQODEemUDuBLiJ0Yie FGV62k+MRBp3uh2V3Fue3Hi3qvdMvTax5r03k3L62GjFMQs0iq6b2un32jm5MlXZGNK+bRq zs4/4xxvObhXZXUBz4dbw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-Original-Sender: lotharlutz@gmx.de X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lotharlutz@gmx.de designates 212.227.15.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lotharlutz@gmx.de Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:12459 Archived-At: On 08/24/2014 02:31 PM, Jens Maurer wrote: > On 08/24/2014 11:05 AM, Markus Mayer wrote: > > Are there any legal restrictions on secure hash functions somewhere? > There are definitely some for encryption algorithms in some places. > I have not found evidence that hash functions are export restricted, but this have to be checked by a layer eventually. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. .