220 11846 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ville Voutilainen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: N4078: Rvalue reference overloads for value() method returns object by value Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 12:18:08 +0300 Lines: 20 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <4DA018C3-2327-4F55-B7F8-7988EC7B789A@gmail.com> <1a858a77-310b-4591-aaf5-960c40d9f5fc@isocpp.org> <66AF41C1-CB37-4311-98EA-D47DBC6068DC@gmail.com> <66c38b61-7a95-4ace-b34f-2346bb334fb9@isocpp.org> <6F4B3C72-9962-48DC-8527-0C89EA1B9710@gmail.com> <072cf8b4-4c74-438e-9999-0aab13bf3182@isocpp.org> <74CEDDAC-1B1B-4F06-9E58-2F025921FE55@gmail.com> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1405070297 25730 80.91.229.3 (11 Jul 2014 09:18:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:18:17 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBC5JHI7A7ALRBUGX72OQKGQEZ5AWJLQ@isocpp.org Fri Jul 11 11:18:11 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-ig0-f198.google.com ([209.85.213.198]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X5Wy2-0001WF-0F for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:18:10 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-ig0-f198.google.com with SMTP id h18sf2701603igc.1 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 02:18:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4Xe3QNGBNUHqmNcNU9XqbLPs6b+8wlapbqNmAKu/y5I=; b=LOBfajAA5rjWUmkPJKt23F/DzpbxzBeYfIKsaKn6CyAarAj++LozsNOQ0g++K8bORy nZkIMKgPsbPEDulfH+C0eO0o/spWvzsX8futRgoLlpf5cjqdDJdjOmhxH5QG+O5iqPVT hBaNZeCOlqueIXTVctvNrWAnOGNnQlECzztB/jyHZpsSTeBjDEkxGb6LEW9t3E8Vfix5 WW1gFeGMLGoJDD67opmJUdeAB4QmL5mkmx4gHYX04aeil1sb0eRaq4NVI1VqJduJD+FU AJ9gN8618L2HzJuox7CjMV0+NnkGhU1mkmz+HAZxv64NhlMIXNIaGqmRuyRpcYTszrwm q5SA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnLcjVxord+RcYhObYgpGO08JOmPwBLEP171zXMDm1N1pGTkTkRqp9LNMm1VIJnf1xHZRcK X-Received: by 10.42.37.71 with SMTP id x7mr1537898icd.4.1405070289069; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 02:18:09 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.140.93.101 with SMTP id c92ls325995qge.90.gmail; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 02:18:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.52.63.226 with SMTP id j2mr53341vds.43.1405070288369; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 02:18:08 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-vc0-x235.google.com (mail-vc0-x235.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c03::235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id zl10si1185647vdb.43.2014.07.11.02.18.08 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Jul 2014 02:18:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ville.voutilainen@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::235 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c03::235; Original-Received: by mail-vc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hu12so1499961vcb.12 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 02:18:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.52.117.209 with SMTP id kg17mr42486890vdb.28.1405070288260; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 02:18:08 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.220.188.73 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 02:18:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: ville.voutilainen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ville.voutilainen@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::235 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ville.voutilainen@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:11846 Archived-At: On 10 July 2014 14:12, David Krauss wrote: > Strange, I didn=E2=80=99t realize that const& is preferred over && for a = const > rvalue implicit argument, but so it is. GCC even fails to prefer const&& > over const&. Just FYI, this has been fixed in GCC recently. --=20 ---=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposa= ls/. .