220 11727 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Klaim_=2D_Jo=C3=ABl_Lamotte?= Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Value constraints (or contract programming in C++) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 15:09:42 +0200 Lines: 59 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <6da50966-e3d3-441d-8474-614a51b035df@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c20afaeb62d904fdc26bcd X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1404911395 16893 80.91.229.3 (9 Jul 2014 13:09:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 13:09:55 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBD3NR2WQQ4IBBF766SOQKGQEIYKSK5A@isocpp.org Wed Jul 09 15:09:49 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-ob0-f198.google.com ([209.85.214.198]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X4rd2-0002yl-SE for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 15:09:45 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-ob0-f198.google.com with SMTP id uy5sf40877635obc.1 for ; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 06:09:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=nn2CgZOgxnAS6tnYXLEsDFtHHa1jfX+d9QGMc0mIUaU=; b=CHNSq+DejsVfRYJF/v9bv/yT0tnoef9VBpG5iMXXK4SQKhBoY0BQ0hILz8vm+wqFY3 UVSAle2OsmM2o51LIaEJGxMTEr3YdRsIaRMGGrQP1z50oJvzfq5vm5oiNggvqE2XN4xv nmK6KIO6mEJzK5iMD5XHRXGmf7O3ObIkRMfmQbgMjTXaVeNZyBSqhAs/VWz4gRrA4c0t G5ylZ+TPoMfmnCKRxGqNhou0sOTG58PRkFBVr0l/+6p08hKI3HLfpdJMBbIqHvXwia3M +7szsca56KI1VgiMbgkDFI6PhTYgUrEVQrz2GcqA8hGyfragBaBHAGx+O1aLEF5kPS2l gKqg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmk+6IsCPNiJV6V3SFR25wxC2v4yUhcZm17fWVjxGKqgyIYNrFvWgOoq1r3jMv9iPAl+ZXb X-Received: by 10.182.33.106 with SMTP id q10mr20227905obi.8.1404911383931; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 06:09:43 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.182.66.137 with SMTP id f9ls1189224obt.48.gmail; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 06:09:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.98.194 with SMTP id ek2mr45767146obb.5.1404911383050; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 06:09:43 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-oa0-x22e.google.com (mail-oa0-x22e.google.com [2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22e]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id jt6si63474665oeb.36.2014.07.09.06.09.43 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Jul 2014 06:09:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mjklaim@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22e as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22e; Original-Received: by mail-oa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id m1so2154883oag.33 for ; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 06:09:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.213.34 with SMTP id np2mr23930989obc.74.1404911382910; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 06:09:42 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.76.19.20 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 06:09:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: mjklaim@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mjklaim@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22e as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mjklaim@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:11727 Archived-At: --001a11c20afaeb62d904fdc26bcd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Another=E2=80=8B point was raised few months ago on Boost mailing list, rel= ative to the Centralized error checking feature from the related papers: its often more useful to the user to be able to specify/change error handling (or not) behaviour for a specific library (or several) rather than for the whole application. I have no specific suggestion of how this could be made possible but I think it's an interesting point to maybe explore in future papers related to yours (but I guess it's too early to explore now). --=20 ---=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposa= ls/. --001a11c20afaeb62d904fdc26bcd Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Another=E2=80=8B point was raised few months ago on Boost = mailing list, relative to the Centralized error checking feature from the r= elated papers:
its often more useful to the user to be able to specify/= change error handling (or not) behaviour for a specific library (or several= ) rather than for the whole application.
I have no specific suggestion of how this could be made possible but I= think it's an interesting point to maybe=C2=A0
explore in fu= ture papers related to yours (but I guess it's too early to explore now= ).

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposa= ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
--001a11c20afaeb62d904fdc26bcd-- .