220 11446 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: corentin.schreiber@cea.fr Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Named function parameters using anonymous structs for C and C++ Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 14:43:57 -0700 (PDT) Lines: 110 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <72c49240-547b-4bf6-8b27-aff6a61c1272@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1258_31640951.1402955037469" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1402955048 7999 80.91.229.3 (16 Jun 2014 21:44:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 21:44:08 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCX4RQEPQAMBBHWK7WOAKGQEONYYBXA@isocpp.org Mon Jun 16 23:44:01 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-pd0-f200.google.com ([209.85.192.200]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wweh5-0000mP-S5 for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 23:44:00 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-pd0-f200.google.com with SMTP id v10sf16373488pde.11 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 14:43:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence :mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=ZOnfndzfipf9+DXca0e+vF+VMBK1cnTk0jUwfqI8TDY=; b=ZtRMgRa4PsnhzM/Vv5g9nsk9jZJ7xKPWFTeqouVFVjHU/iX9OFksViPmhhB2F+XxGw r5bymmRe3NbKzo4mZdWhCg6sQIL9TDKFYH3oO+/urHDqD3jtEqi3bQZuYnBGyxZ6kLWX OuTdFgN2sKAN3r2eKniG6DJ4e4zPldKUB5MLFn0ZcOJEAYwIpi0wgH1PBnLAW5CeVWoh yCnND3/k3dw2+SCg4IWO/CUP1NjkRS7VEOQrdymjlE2xveQVG4ljU2PxcBczvpNVH/ip i1Fr/lndkBhJ3CEuR8GcYlbCXfUseEC99/cfwSIUzhNBtmDUwEXB91r/lWty1odpXfmV WfJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkXwUk3ndA6tvpoxVv4WmOROpiWl5ZeAqlWPnh7mKzWAHzH1smJQuoAy58Lt1g97H+l8VUB X-Received: by 10.68.137.99 with SMTP id qh3mr288339pbb.2.1402955038780; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 14:43:58 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.140.89.104 with SMTP id u95ls4684984qgd.5.gmail; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 14:43:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.19.97 with SMTP id 88mr45194qgg.31.1402955038100; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 14:43:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: corentin.schreiber@cea.fr Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:11446 Archived-At: ------=_Part_1258_31640951.1402955037469 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le lundi 16 juin 2014 21:18:52 UTC+2, Matthew Fioravante a =C3=A9crit : > > That also implies adding support for C tagged structure initialization to= =20 > C++, which implies defining how it works with constructors. At first pass= ,=20 > I'd say only enable the syntax for POD structs. This would need to be=20 > studied very carefully. I wouldn't be surprised if this was already broug= ht=20 > up in the past, studied, and rejected for some reason. Does anyone have= =20 > insight on that? Google doesn't appear to be helpful. > A proposal has been written recently: https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/forum/#!msg/std-proposals/IgDFqKjKlR= s/CGARpDJy9JsJ=20 I do not know what is the current status of that proposal though. --=20 ---=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposa= ls/. ------=_Part_1258_31640951.1402955037469 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Le lundi 16 juin 2014 21:18:52 UTC+2, Matthew Fioravante a= =C3=A9crit :
That also implies adding support for C tagged structure initialization= to C++, which implies defining how it works with constructors. At first pa= ss, I'd say only enable the syntax for POD structs. This would need to be s= tudied very carefully. I wouldn't be surprised if this was already brought = up in the past, studied, and rejected for some reason. Does anyone have ins= ight on that? Google doesn't appear to be helpful.
<= br>A proposal has been written recently:
https://groups.google.com/a/iso= cpp.org/forum/#!msg/std-proposals/IgDFqKjKlRs/CGARpDJy9JsJ
I do not kno= w what is the current status of that proposal though.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposa= ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
------=_Part_1258_31640951.1402955037469-- .