220 11416 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: walter1234 Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Named function parameters using anonymous structs for C and C++ Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 14:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Lines: 46 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <72c49240-547b-4bf6-8b27-aff6a61c1272@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_617_10577749.1402866064613" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1402866074 31961 80.91.229.3 (15 Jun 2014 21:01:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 21:01:14 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBDO7FOW36ILRBEMT7COAKGQEWY5UQTI@isocpp.org Sun Jun 15 23:01:08 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-ob0-f200.google.com ([209.85.214.200]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WwHY3-0005JG-LX for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 23:01:07 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-ob0-f200.google.com with SMTP id wm4sf23220412obc.3 for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 14:01:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=ROdnusqEa0OnqRg3JBOJTZyf7qrQP2Tik25nbGoiV4c=; b=UxiRCp+iOigguArnBSrj6RsHmw2Ht8S469lXbJqtLBZy3W+2CCEtj9mN4bvCXjSff2 oz1MljfTd3xzMC0ih+TBeArH3xpjmV31ijL4kX1lUAQoVoA8XszMQPTXNQ+Vo8pFoa0u WNlNWSkk6EET0MceN7/sRgexUPLt5/L7Akk3enh9svhTSTKw1BjspVi+l3djlkwb/Ca/ rormB1ndM0JFvn/y0FuZVrQsaPGxXn4eI6XlxJU4vzYnpj+37iEDC0IOrwla0vyqbk13 QRwOyxBHBosBEH+qWWBh/mdWMsCiTYqI3qHOf/I7YqdMDg8aI+h8S3QxFfhkxwfZjyj0 1BMg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence :mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=ROdnusqEa0OnqRg3JBOJTZyf7qrQP2Tik25nbGoiV4c=; b=lL7U4szo/nKoAs5Mo9RTpuGMUpz5gCWrwexL9cVSoztyDefv3IJ/ml6ulWmk0jCTAA ylOlIKoVsE1esr40bBCBUY28VxzeB3FwPgpbnrmZTm3KhTtV1bfUulN6S8LPyd5b27Aj pyXmzG5X2yC1VUYFLo27CnFcVgi6mH9tG0FO4kkxM9fu4t3bdeQQibTLi3MDd7j9A+hs x8OEB0OPIDpov+Pdp6lDQC9GTgG+ObUBqq+lenBZPPzhAxZICstUxyisunu0xgU3Tt+t k/Ad+YdrEcjS5K/3n9UUl+UsgomthNDr9sqKNAbIE6wVEdN5bd4H94EjnI0kwRToHl/F G8zQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlxWmOTufJBdcXMnKx/PNJl4ABNpN+yRynHhpulHRnbJJRj1HgqUKIelR34N05ZdQakicBs X-Received: by 10.182.135.167 with SMTP id pt7mr3318853obb.14.1402866066614; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 14:01:06 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.182.40.168 with SMTP id y8ls1698987obk.39.gmail; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 14:01:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.96.133 with SMTP id ds5mr104obb.16.1402866065303; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 14:01:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <72c49240-547b-4bf6-8b27-aff6a61c1272@isocpp.org> X-Original-Sender: walter2bz@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:11416 Archived-At: ------=_Part_617_10577749.1402866064613 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I agree anonymous structs would be a great feature. Would there be less risk of ambiguous parses if the designated initialiser syntax of C was taken - and would that make it easier to retrofit into C? display(screen, { .yres=480, .xres=640}); -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. ------=_Part_617_10577749.1402866064613 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I agree anonymous structs would be a great feature.

Would there be less risk of ambiguous parses if the desi= gnated initialiser syntax of C was taken  - and would that make it eas= ier to retrofit into C?

display(screen, { .yres=3D4= 80, .xres=3D640});

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposa= ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
------=_Part_617_10577749.1402866064613-- .