220 11306 <CALQmNFjdRRLn5cko7u6puHN+=WeO5tX10etz-MWE=iLyVkPN2Q@mail.gmail.com> article
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Sean Middleditch <sean@middleditch.us>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals
Subject: Re: Re: Comments on n3976 (array_view)
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:56:46 -0700
Lines: 61
Approved: news@gmane.org
Message-ID: <CALQmNFjdRRLn5cko7u6puHN+=WeO5tX10etz-MWE=iLyVkPN2Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ef9f1714-0b21-4ff5-87f3-ba3f4c8d06f4@isocpp.org>
	<7177de96-50e1-4590-99dc-eda255203f26@isocpp.org>
	<5ff6c439-3147-4d5f-809a-8adf86c17dc4@isocpp.org>
Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1402703815 10823 80.91.229.3 (13 Jun 2014 23:56:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 23:56:55 +0000 (UTC)
To: std-proposals@isocpp.org
Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCDODCNR2QPRBPU752OAKGQEROEPNPI@isocpp.org Sat Jun 14 01:56:51 2014
Return-path: <std-proposals+bncBCDODCNR2QPRBPU752OAKGQEROEPNPI@isocpp.org>
Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mail-yh0-f70.google.com ([209.85.213.70])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <std-proposals+bncBCDODCNR2QPRBPU752OAKGQEROEPNPI@isocpp.org>)
	id 1WvbKy-0003YW-7W
	for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 01:56:48 +0200
Original-Received: by mail-yh0-f70.google.com with SMTP id a41sf14006018yho.5
        for <gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org>; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:56:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=/kYX5RuCPLdfsRkqsVKdBPOoMkDvLeI9pGCrOA5ZghY=;
        b=T9+v7h/+emOxwXuuiVuoeirMyh1HN5t4XcyPLmQmIvN1Zi+uGwgdqGmP3kORzrGzjc
         59+yhcZKY1ovtR8mTdNc7ZO1m3NUdaAvH9v+21aa8Zkgh3KGsChyednUFQbqNGuV7f+q
         ZLaUQNwY4vEWJcqlKKNQp4jO30AdqT/0hhET5LBiXyRjwhk/pWL5tjg/NpQraySKrcXS
         bWPT+pifVU6DOmJphjTmG/rlrQLm8rZxR/WJvgfhiLtvgcRodjJVImc6LntTamyzxB6t
         scTgK/ZqzjdNvxqg372rB6u6FBnU7YT6QpeCRcbuhXSSIwJx4dW4BKpsen1T1NS+qycB
         +4MA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkY114xVl03AVtJnzGHq4z54dCvIRVqjhrSCRD/PdMgrbJjmG74FHpFghwAWo5RBpmA5XU+
X-Received: by 10.236.216.5 with SMTP id f5mr914954yhp.10.1402703807422;
        Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:56:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org
Original-Received: by 10.140.34.196 with SMTP id l62ls3633940qgl.35.gmail; Fri, 13 Jun
 2014 16:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.58.122.138 with SMTP id ls10mr4091921veb.13.1402703806750;
        Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
Original-Received: from mail-vc0-x234.google.com (mail-vc0-x234.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c03::234])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ur5si1893598vec.61.2014.06.13.16.56.46
        for <std-proposals@isocpp.org>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sean.middleditch@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::234 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c03::234;
Original-Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id im17so2945315vcb.39
        for <std-proposals@isocpp.org>; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.52.185.72 with SMTP id fa8mr3399687vdc.12.1402703806421;
 Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
Original-Sender: sean.middleditch@gmail.com
Original-Received: by 10.58.99.102 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5ff6c439-3147-4d5f-809a-8adf86c17dc4@isocpp.org>
X-Original-Sender: sean@middleditch.us
X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;       spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of sean.middleditch@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::234 as
 permitted sender) smtp.mail=sean.middleditch@gmail.com;       dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org
List-ID: <std-proposals.isocpp.org>
X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/post>, <mailto:std-proposals@isocpp.org>
List-Help: <http://support.google.com/a/isocpp.org/bin/topic.py?topic=25838>, <mailto:std-proposals+help@isocpp.org>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/>
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/subscribe>,
 <mailto:std-proposals+subscribe@isocpp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/subscribe>,
 <mailto:googlegroups-manage+399137483710+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:11306
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals/11306>

Adding a bunch of cruft that is planned to be obsoleted with an update
right around the corner seems like a waste of time and needless bloat
to the library for no practical gain. It's not even clear that there's
any point in time we'd even need the interim solution: C++14 is done,
no new library additions are going to be made to it, all work going
forward is for C++17, and it's rather likely that the first version of
comprehensive ranges will either be in C++17 or a TS released around
the same time.

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
<jeremy@jeremyms.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, June 13, 2014 2:37:50 PM UTC-7, Sean Middleditch wrote:
>>
>> On Friday, June 13, 2014 12:17:40 PM UTC-7, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:
>>>
>>> C++ is sorely in need of a "vocabulary type" for representing pointer
>>> ranges.
>>
>>
>> There's already a Ranges sub group working on this problem, and looking at
>> even more general cases of ranges than just pairs of iterators/pointers.
>>
>> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/ranges
>
>
> Sure, but (pointer, size) ranges are an extremely common and important case,
> and devising a comprehensive range library that handles all cases is much
> harder than handling just the (pointer, size) case.  Also, in the worst
> case, a one-dimensional array_view type would become redundant after a range
> library is standardized, but it wouldn't cause any interoperability
> problems, since the types would surely be implicitly convertible.
>
> --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/d/topic/std-proposals/xzb1d5KUxMU/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
> To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
> Visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/.



-- 
Sean Middleditch
http://seanmiddleditch.com

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/.

.
