220 11088 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ville Voutilainen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: Core Issue: deleted templates Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 15:31:33 +0300 Lines: 30 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <9f5782b9-8ba4-4be6-a874-326df936ff24@isocpp.org> <600874ab-714d-46c8-8bce-e1fb5c18f6e0@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1401971502 18498 80.91.229.3 (5 Jun 2014 12:31:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 12:31:42 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBC5JHI7A7ALRBJOGYGOAKGQE7IKV3LI@isocpp.org Thu Jun 05 14:31:35 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-ie0-f197.google.com ([209.85.223.197]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WsWpT-0006p5-CO for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 14:31:35 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-ie0-f197.google.com with SMTP id rd18sf4292086iec.8 for ; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 05:31:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=zG8xbceaF08Zo+r64vOrxD8Omd/WwkygGLqHdD09sz0=; b=mYyaChRSCrVxAyZtiziOOMfWAoXBBfA+VGmUCFglU0O88dAKaajIouAqfySZojG0v6 pRjOpZFJpbpg0I+AL/vT9qJaQA+2iShXUh6WhyusjV+bmusxK3sNG4BgbZ1MNnGsQvmj pE7gNm6VSRQ2YADasQ4TYc0v3Z39cXYFecgf4LzFqm2DrgcyCSqOKKfDLzsw9G3xq7GE RGZ9AlxV64U2rGF65vPmTW5XnmcJQ2qIK7o96tzm4dAS/cTLvxOmqbKxEJdR4HGGFlVi CF2Ape9nBVQ+K8b7npPkoR2CzvFdljG60Ljfwz2HDSv0iotnodQuJJQ5j89Wi0BojwHa JV0w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnsX86SnTbH3EC891M3AQCvDIY+9KHIyjao4gkOMfiXXj1gX1YOjfH1vSt/qpx/JcGgO8sI X-Received: by 10.182.137.233 with SMTP id ql9mr13619529obb.46.1401971494311; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 05:31:34 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.140.50.16 with SMTP id r16ls101519qga.71.gmail; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 05:31:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.224.25.133 with SMTP id z5mr17212036qab.97.1401971493615; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 05:31:33 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-qg0-x235.google.com (mail-qg0-x235.google.com [2607:f8b0:400d:c04::235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i19si7986978qaq.118.2014.06.05.05.31.33 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Jun 2014 05:31:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ville.voutilainen@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c04::235 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c04::235; Original-Received: by mail-qg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id f51so1446781qge.12 for ; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 05:31:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.96.51 with SMTP id j48mr76483309qge.24.1401971493503; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 05:31:33 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.224.181.5 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 05:31:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <600874ab-714d-46c8-8bce-e1fb5c18f6e0@isocpp.org> X-Original-Sender: ville.voutilainen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ville.voutilainen@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c04::235 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ville.voutilainen@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:11088 Archived-At: On 5 June 2014 15:08, wrote: > Oh right, forget that... I mixed up multiple inclusion of the same header > and ODR. > > Sorry for the noise ;) No worries. I think deleting a class means that it can't have another definition, so you can't do // in header class thisandthat = delete; // in another file class thisandthat {/*whatever*/}; and regarding the earlier question about pointers and references, I think we should do what we do with deleted functions, aka make uses of such deleted things ill-formed. That means you can't use thisandthat* or thisandthat& either. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. .